Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

In a nutshell, this judge ruled that Plaintiff Favorito can sue members of the election board, but he has no right to subpoena the ballots as evidence. So, without the ballots, the case will be difficult to prove. I assume Favorito will now appeal that order if possible, or bring a petition for a writ of mandamus. The trial judge has dragged these proceeding out in a manner inconsistent with the importance of the matter. The judge is complicit in the steal conspiracy, even if after the fact. We call it a democratic republic, but citizens can't see the ballots from the election!?
1 posted on 06/24/2021 6:20:36 PM PDT by Dr. Franklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: Dr. Franklin

What more proof of fraud is needed than this ruling.

Trying to hide evidence is proof of crime.


2 posted on 06/24/2021 6:24:54 PM PDT by ifinnegan ( Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Franklin

“It’s not he who votes that counts, but he who counts the votes” - Joseph Stalin


5 posted on 06/24/2021 6:30:15 PM PDT by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Franklin

Crooked judge.


8 posted on 06/24/2021 6:35:05 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (“Unlimited power in the hands of limited people always leads to cruelty.” ― Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Franklin

Get ready for election workers in other swing states claim Sovereign Immunity.


10 posted on 06/24/2021 6:41:18 PM PDT by White Lives Matter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Franklin

“ The judge obviously agreed and essentially ruled that the state cannot be compelled to show independent parties that ballots cast in an election were valid.”

Why the hell not?!


11 posted on 06/24/2021 6:45:38 PM PDT by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Franklin

Well somebody is wrong.

‘Huge victory’: Judge names members of Fulton election board in lawsuit; ballot audit will proceed

https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/huge-victory-judge-names-members-fulton-election-board-lawsuit-ballot-audit


13 posted on 06/24/2021 6:48:34 PM PDT by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Franklin
We call it a democratic republic, but citizens can't see the ballots from the election!?

That's what a republic is vs. a democracy.

In a democratic republic we trust our elected representatives to manage and audit our elections.

14 posted on 06/24/2021 6:50:01 PM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Franklin

Good God!


16 posted on 06/24/2021 6:52:37 PM PDT by Williams (Stop Tolerating The Intolerant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Franklin

Apparatchiks protect other Apparatchiks...

The only good communist is a dead communist...


19 posted on 06/24/2021 6:59:45 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another Sam Adams now that we desperately need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Franklin
You are misreading. That is not what the Judge is finding.

The ballot inspection will continue.


22 posted on 06/24/2021 7:04:47 PM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Franklin
The lawyers also claimed sovereign immunity to keep the ballots from being subpoenaed for discovery. The judge obviously agreed and essentially ruled that the state cannot be compelled to show independent parties that ballots cast in an election were valid.

This makes no sense to me. I'm not saying that the law has to make sense (although it should), but the judge has ruled that the ballots cannot be audited by "independent parties" Is that correct?
Does that mean it can only be "audited" by people with a vested interest in not revealing their errors (intentional, or otherwise)? That is absurd.
An audit only works if it is performed by independent parties. That is basic Quality Control.
Seems like we are in a bizzare-o world, and hopefully this decision will be quickly appealed and overturned.

23 posted on 06/24/2021 7:07:01 PM PDT by El Cid (Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Franklin

How can ballots have sovereign immunity?


24 posted on 06/24/2021 7:07:39 PM PDT by Fido969 ( Sc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Franklin

What’s to stop the GA state Senate from ordering an audit like the AZ Senate did?


26 posted on 06/24/2021 7:09:22 PM PDT by HandBasketHell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Franklin

This totally contradicts an article that was posted shortly before yours.

Judge allows Georgia ballot review case to move forward
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3970733/posts

Just what is this Becker news?


27 posted on 06/24/2021 7:09:52 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Franklin

Is it legal, or should it be legal for a judge to hide the evidence of a crime? Can the judge be prosecuted?


28 posted on 06/24/2021 7:10:21 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (Political Correctness kills!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Franklin

in the name of transparency


29 posted on 06/24/2021 7:11:04 PM PDT by joshua c (Dump the LEFT. Cable tv, Big tech, national name brands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Franklin
We call it a democratic republic,

Not sure to whom you’re referring as “we,” but I and any self respecting American call it a representative republic

33 posted on 06/24/2021 7:24:12 PM PDT by Ahithophel (Communication is an art form susceptible to sudden technical failure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Franklin

A judge does not have the discipline to put politics aside and rule with wisdom. It is fashionable now days, to rule the way you want to make policy.. if you are a dem, then rule for the dems..

Some justice!!!!


34 posted on 06/24/2021 7:30:36 PM PDT by frnewsjunkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Franklin

Democratic republic? Like North Korea (DPRK - Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea).

Wrong. A democratic republic is communism.

The USA is Constitutional Republic.


39 posted on 06/24/2021 8:17:59 PM PDT by Qui is (Biden spews and Harris swallows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Franklin
We call it a democratic republic,

Not sure to whom you’re referring as “we,” but I and any self respecting American call it a representative republic

41 posted on 06/24/2021 8:26:26 PM PDT by Ahithophel (Communication is an art form susceptible to sudden technical failure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson