you'll own nothing, and you'll be happy...
Posted on 05/25/2021 12:26:47 PM PDT by Red Badger
Doctor Zhivago
lol yeah, Ol’ Doc Zhivago had too big a house and the revolutionaries decided to take it but they were nice and let them still live in the master bedroom upstairs.. until they decided they needed that room too.
sounds like an invitation to all criminals. Come one come all, bring your personal effects, pick a house, go right on in, stay a while, eat the food, take what you want, kick the existing people out the door.
The pushing on good law abiding Americans continues without much of a fight. When will that change?
We are going to have to start hanging thieves.
There are too many of them and they aren’t afraid of you or of having to go to jail.
Doesnt everyone have an ATM in their garage?
When dead people start showing up on the doorsteps..............
Now extrapolate this to the entire country as millions of foreigners squat on the land asserting that they own it.
The problem becomes apparent.
you'll own nothing, and you'll be happy...
A blog posted as news.
Totally credible.
Yuri Zhivago said “Welcome” to the occupiers. “It is not for you to welcome us” replied Comrade Kaprugina. “There was room for thirteen families in this house”.
Seems like someone with a multimillion $ house could hire a lawyer to hire some private security to provide the squatters with a one-way boat ride.
I don’t see how the 15,000 fentanyl tabs and what sure sounds like massive amounts of stolen goods including firearms did not merit more government attention. Homeowner should report that the squatters were overheard complaining about voting fraud, saying Trump was really President, Viva January 6th, etc.
For a real jaw-dropper, look up “Moorish-Americans”.
… (T)he theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property.The rotten fruits are already at work in states like Washington.
We Communists have been reproached with the desire of abolishing the right of personally acquiring property as the fruit of a man’s own labor, which property is alleged to be the groundwork of all personal freedom, activity and independence.
Hard-won, self-acquired, self-earned property! Do you mean the property of petty artisan and of the small peasant, a form of property that preceded the bourgeois form? There is no need to abolish that; the development of industry has to a great extent already destroyed it, and is still destroying it daily.
Or do you mean the modern bourgeois private property?
But does wage-labor create any property for the laborer? Not a bit. It creates capital, i.e., that kind of property which exploits wage-labor, and which cannot increase except upon condition of begetting a new supply of wage-labor for fresh exploitation. Property, in its present form, is based on the antagonism of capital and wage labor.
Let us examine both sides of this antagonism.
To be a capitalist is to have not only a purely personal but a social status in production. Capital is a collective product, and only by the united action of many members—nay, in the last resort, only by the united action of all members of society—can it be set in motion.
Capital is therefore not only personal; it is a social power.
When, therefore, capital is converted into common property, into the property of all members of society, personal property is not thereby transformed into social property. It is only the social character of the property that is changed. It loses its class character. […]
In bourgeois society, therefore, the past dominates the present; in Communist society, the present dominates the past. In bourgeois society, capital is independent and has individuality while the living person is dependent and has no individuality.
And the abolition of this state of things is called, by the bourgeois, abolition of individuality and freedom! And rightly so. The abolition of bourgeois individuality, bourgeois independence, and bourgeois freedom is undoubtedly aimed at. …
— Communist Manifesto, Chapter 2
Even during the WuFlu all properties were kept rented and the renters kept up with their rent. A few late pays but no refusals to pay.
But in the past month four of the six have decided to sell.
It as become very clear that the law, never very friendly, is going to be tilted so radically against us that there is no reason to keep up our business.
“Nothing was your own except the few cubic centimetres inside your skull. ”
― George Orwell, 1984
The article does not make it clear who allowed the squatters to do what they were doing. Was there a court order? From what judge, and what was the pretext for allowing the occupation and the theft? Did the State Patrol intervene? Who authorized all of this nonsense?
Squatters have been pulling this crap all around the country for a long time, way before this particular residence in Sammamish made the news.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.