-PJ
Posted on 05/22/2021 9:37:18 PM PDT by Texas Fossil
The people on the ground in Windham, New Hampshire, are doing an excellent job holding the election officials and auditors accountable to the people during this forensic ballot audit. The audit started because the tabulating machines (Dominion hardware and software) did not accurately count the votes from the physical ballots.
During the first small audit (recount) it was discovered that Republican votes were undercounted and Democrat candidates were overcounted. This anomaly was discovered during a hand recount of the ballots as compared to the electronic tabulation results. After the first set of tabulation results were discovered to be inaccurate the state authorized a full forensic audit. The full audit is ongoing, here’s the update:
Yesterday it was reported the second hand recount matched the first, which means the machine tabulation of those ballots was wrong. The auditors wondered if folded ballots generated the problem. The test of folded -vs- unfolded ballots (counted by same machine) showed a high number of errors. That would mean the tabulation machines across all of New Hampshire may have this problem.
(Many photo's at the link)
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
Hand count repeats same numbers.
Errors in favor of democrats?
How can we find out if this is true?
The dems carefully constructed house of cards is beginning to crumble. Wonder what will happen if it turns out President Trump did, in fact, get more legitimate votes than BuckFiden?
Sundance owns The Conservative Treehouse.
His track record is very very good.
That is enough for me.
Yes
But yeah, funny the errors always lean in favor of the pinkos.
No, it is not funny. It is a crime and they know it.
-PJ
So much for the imbeciles who keep claiming you only need to look at copies of the static disk images to do an audit.
really, they all of a sudden “wondered” about folding ballots? why they wonder that? and why would folding a ballot cause the machines to flip rep votes to dems? and since all the ballots are folded (right?) why does it only do the flip part of the time. machines are deterministic. is it because some folds are different from others?
what i would do: why didn’t they just run the machine on a debugger and see what the code was doing as it read a ballot wrong and flipped a vote. there is an if statement and a jump the machine is doing, and it better not be a jump to code that only gets executed when the machine is about to “cheat.”
sorry nh, this doesn’t make sense. sounds bogus. my bs meter is pegging. man, i hope we have some honest observers on this audit.
The crease in the paper is scanned and the resultant output triggers a sub-routine which reverses the outcome.
Do I have to explain everything to you? :-)
Regards,
yeah, well, i’d sure like to see that code.
These machines are adjusted to the exact ballot configuration. The line the fields up to fit the printed ballot.
It is possible to miss align the pages intentionally. The fold issue was only done by a machine for the mail in ballots. The others may be folded to get in the ballot box, but they are not creased as cleanly as the machine folded ones.
I know about elections, non-automated. Have run elections for many years.
“How can we find out if this is true?”
Call CNN.
So what? They counted on this coming to light eventually but knew that once the die of the inauguration was cast, and enough water of this scaministration went under the bridge, there was no way the election would be corrected even if absolutely irrefutable evidence were adjudicated to show it.
It’s similar to the Chauvin show trial. The jurors know that to come to any other conclusion than the “correct” one will result in uncontainable violence.
Nothing will be done.
Let me guess the party the “mistakes” favored...
A lot of fraud seems to be in the adjudication process. Adjudication rates SKYROCKETED from past normal sub 1% levels to in some cases double digits for GOP/TRUMP ballets.
The ADJUDICATOR is the person who determines what the voter selected. From what I read, very MURKY.
Reports of GOP ballots intentionally misprinted to make the scan fail and force them into that process. Fold them wrong intentionally and bam, some corrupt partisan is deciding what the voter really intended. Even read where the original ballet was then reprinted so audit scans show everything on the up and up.
The precincts with 130% voter turnout and dead voters always seem to favor democrats too. I wonder how that is always the case.
We will be in uncharted territory. And the question becomes what happens with other races, like for the House & Senate, will the audits overturn those races as well?
No matter what the MSM say or the elites say, this is a very serious matter. Especially as we’ve seen the Democrat agenda unfolding here in the first half of the year.
Are folded ballots that were miscounted, intent? Not necessarily unless election officials realized the error was occurring and failed to correct the count.
Now, I am going to say this because I am an older person. But...I thought it was fairly common knowledge that tabulators/scanners cannot accurately read paper with folds, creases, tears, etc. This factoid should have invalidated the process of “mail-in” ballots. Is it possible the democrat leadership knew this and that it would fall in their favor?
We know if the election is overturned they are not going to give-up the power without a fight. For the good of the nation we cannot allow them to stay in total power.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.