Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: GA JUDGE ALLOWS FURTHER SCAN OF MAIL-IN BALLOT INSPECTION IN FULTON COUNTY…GROUND ZERO OF ELECTION FRAUD…CASE COULD FLIP PRESIDENTIAL CERTIFICATION
CD Media ^ | May 21, 20 | CD Media Staff

Posted on 05/21/2021 9:37:45 AM PDT by Dr. Franklin

UPDATE 1115 EST – Judge orders ballots unsealed. Parties to appear at ballot storage location 10am May 28th. Ballots will be scanned at 600 dpi or higher. Protocol to be determined.

—————————–

In an ongoing hearing, Henry County, GA judge, the Honorable Brian J. Amero may give access to the plaintiffs (VoterGA.org, Garland Favorito, and another plaintiff) to the physical mail-in ballots in Fulton County, which could show massive election fraud in GA during the 2020 presidential election cycle, and the follow-on runoff that decided control of the U.S. Senate for the Democrat Party, leading to full control of the American government.

In the hearing, lawyers for VoterGA.org described large discrepancies (21%) between the number of ballot batches reported by the GA Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger who certified the election, and the number of ballot batches actually provided by court-ordered access in the previous April hearing in the case.

(Excerpt) Read more at creativedestructionmedia.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: audit; discovery; elections; elections2020; freebeertomorrow; fulton; fultoncounty; ga; georgia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-184 next last
To: Leaning Right

The severity, in military terms, of the November 3rd event is unprecedented. Don’t miss this point.

The response will overwhelm the two items on your list.


161 posted on 05/21/2021 2:24:14 PM PDT by reasonisfaith (What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
The Constitution doesn't use the term "legitimate" either.

I'm pretty sure that when Constitution uses the word "president", that it means the legitimate president, and not an impostor.

162 posted on 05/21/2021 2:24:29 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: HandyDandy

I don’t think they can stop what’s coming.


163 posted on 05/21/2021 2:24:46 PM PDT by reasonisfaith (What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: WashingtonSource

Technically they’re separate since Constitutionally they’re separate offices and voted (I should say rubber stamped !)for by the electors separately. If a miracle happened it would be two separate impeachments and two separate trials in the Senate.


164 posted on 05/21/2021 2:43:47 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: HandyDandy
"What do you think Americans will do when we “expose the fraud”?"

Demand that the vulnerabilities which allowed it be fixed and future elections be more transparent to ensure they're free and fair. And I think Joe Biden will be hamstrung politically to the point where he can't do anything that's the least bit controversial, which pulls him hard to the center until we can have a fair election with the new protections in place.

165 posted on 05/21/2021 2:47:58 PM PDT by 2aProtectsTheRest (The media is banging the fear drum enough. Don't help them do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: heavy metal

look for a new moniker touting the same leftist, government control bs. we’ll know them.

that 2A guy is a total bottom dweller.


166 posted on 05/21/2021 2:54:11 PM PDT by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: 2aProtectsTheRest

you spend almost 24 hours a day posting on these threads...


167 posted on 05/21/2021 2:58:29 PM PDT by heavy metal (smiling improves your face value as well as making people wonder what the hell you're up to... 😁)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie2001

there’s a couple more on my radar... 😁


168 posted on 05/21/2021 3:00:25 PM PDT by heavy metal (smiling improves your face value as well as making people wonder what the hell you're up to... 😁)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew
Again I ask, how do we “remove” a President who is by definition not the President? The fraud precedes and deligitimizes everything subsequent. We are currently operating without a President, because the office is preeminently defined by the authority invested by those who elect him, and that authority simply does not exist. It never has. He a pretender. No need to act or think otherwise.

And again, I answer Article II Section 4.

The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.

Perpetrating voter fraud is a High Crime.

Congress had the opportunity to challenge the Electoral votes cast by the individual states. The Republicans were on their way to delaying the count by challenging the Electoral votes from all of these contested states, and were going to do force a joint Congressional investigation into voting irregularities when the Capitol was breached. After they reconvened, the Republicans lost their nerve.

Congress voted to accept the Electoral Votes, declared Biden and Harris the winners, and Biden and Harris were sworn in. All as the Constitution stipulates.

Once the oath has been administered, that person IS the President. Any fraud discovered afterwards does not nullify Congress' actions. It provides grounds for Congress to undo their mistake via Impeachment and removal from office.

I'm sorry you don't like how our founding fathers wrote the Constitution, but that doesn't change the facts.

Biden may not be the President in your eyes, and he certainly isn't the President in my eyes, but in the eyes of the Constitution, he is the President.

169 posted on 05/21/2021 3:19:09 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

The Constitution does not wax philosophical in regard to frauds in the highest office. Biden is simply not President. To appeal to the Constitution in terms of removal is to bark up the wrong tree. You cannot remove something that is not present in the first place.


170 posted on 05/21/2021 3:44:53 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew (No audit. No peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie2001

By their words shall we know them.


171 posted on 05/21/2021 4:39:21 PM PDT by HandyDandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

It would still fall to the VP...


Depends on sequence. You’d make the VP leave first if you have sense, then install a new VP, then make the President leave.


172 posted on 05/21/2021 7:26:23 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: lepton

You’d make the VP leave first if you have sense, then install a new VP, then make the President leave.

Good way to do it

But what if they put Stacy Abrams in as VP?

I prefer Kamala


173 posted on 05/21/2021 8:22:46 PM PDT by Syncro (Facts is Facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
If Biden didn't win, then Biden has to step down.

* * *

Bingo! I'm not a Constitutional lawyer, but what you just said puts a ton of moral weight on the country. Whether we can oust Biden or not, we surely MUST TRY OUR BEST to do so!

If Biden didn't win, then Biden has to step down.

That sentence will put a strangle hold on Democrat legislation!

174 posted on 05/21/2021 9:33:44 PM PDT by poconopundit (Hard oak fist in an Irish velvet glove: Kayleigh the Shillelagh we salute your work!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: poconopundit

We have to de-Biden the White (?) House, and thoroughly fumigate the place, before the Trumps rightfully move back in and take over.

175 posted on 05/21/2021 9:41:11 PM PDT by Songcraft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: poconopundit

It’s as if democrats were saying a bank robber get to keep the ‘loot’ if he isn’t caught within 3 months .

It’s insane.

There’s nothing in the Constitution that says if you steal an election you get to stay in office - - (as long as you’re not caught by ‘swearing in’ day...)


176 posted on 05/22/2021 9:11:57 AM PDT by GOPJ (Liz Cheney: There was NO VOTER FRAUD Winston. YOU agree Winston? How many fingers Winston...?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

There is no constitutional option because the constitution was written for a moral people. At this point we need other options. If the courts won’t settle this...than what’s left?


177 posted on 05/22/2021 4:34:07 PM PDT by lula (Shine the light of truth Lord, confound the deceiver I pray...AMEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

This is disingenuous. It’s not because we know. It’s not because we want to toss the President.
It will be because we have proved in an overwhelming fashion that there was fraud.
No one from the right, the left or Independent can be allowed to steal an election. Anytime there is overwhelming fraud, that election should be decertified. When it’s just opinion the results stand.


178 posted on 05/23/2021 10:31:18 PM PDT by JayGalt (The dogs bark but the caravan moves on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: 2aProtectsTheRest

You rely so heavily on precedent that you state that the Nation cannot move without one. You seem to have forgotten the chicken & the egg.
How did we get precedents? Cases were brought, argued & decided and those decisions became precedent. There have always been cases decided without precedent and actions by Congress without precedent. Precedents are respected but are not binding. They are overturned when flawed.
There is no rule that says common sense needs to be ignored & criminals need to be allowed to profit from crimes because no one has been caught committing that crime before & we have no precedent.


179 posted on 05/23/2021 10:41:37 PM PDT by JayGalt (The dogs bark but the caravan moves on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: deport

The order of succession does not come into play if the election was fraudulent & set aside. We either have a new election of based on the amount of fraud established the true winner of te election is seated.


180 posted on 05/23/2021 10:46:09 PM PDT by JayGalt (The dogs bark but the caravan moves on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-184 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson