Posted on 05/21/2021 3:30:55 AM PDT by USA Conservative
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument
Patriots are reminded that he only power that the states have expressly constitutionally delegated to the feds to deal with sex-related discrimination is limited to voting rights issues, evidenced by the 19th Amendment.
"19th Amendment:
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation [emphasis added]."
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
The judge’s decision is another example of a post-17th Amendment ratification, institutionally indoctrinated judge unconstitutionally expanding the already unconstitutionally big federal government’s powers, the very corrupt, Democratic-controlled Congress wrongly remaining silent on the judge’s overreach imo.
Also, consider that the states have never expressly constitutionally given the misguided feds the specific power to dictate policy for INTRAstate schooling purposes, the judge wrongly dictating policy from the bench in this example.
Patriots need to primary federal and state lawmakers who don’t promise to help remove activist judges from the bench.
It’s either a Christian College or it’s not.
I could well be wrong but I think resistance to the whole idea of men in women’s bathroom idea is not going to go away no matter what laws Congress passes, what E.O.s Biden enacts or what rulings Federal judges make. Half of the population is female—genuine female and I don’t think they’re on board with this idea at all.
Easy solution:
Female sees person with penis in females showers. Female that does not approve reports said male to other males on campus.
Males then decide to have private ‘interaction’ with said subject, while adhering to CDC mask guidelines for the ‘unvaccinated’; either convincing subject to not repeat such action, or making the subject unable to repeat such action.
Such male responses should also server as a deterrent against future perversions to be attempted by others.
just my $0.02
jimjohn - OUT
p
Judge Roseann Ketchmark.
Oh How this male, Candor7, wants to shower with her.
In the shower, I will play with her assets so badly that she will want to reverse her decision.
Obviously she is a lefty activist ideologue judge, completely disconnected with the People.
Looks like it what she is hoping for.
This is right up there with 'defund the police', close our pipelines, long gas lines, inflation, commie thugs, Hunter's corruption...
... a true wealth of things to run on...
Could be. 8>)
First, a Christian college must refuse to comply with such an ignorant anti-Christian dictate.
Second, this horrible judge should be taken to the town square and bound in stocks, even dunked twice a day. Someday she will meet the Just Judge of the universe; in her present moral state her eternity looks awful dark!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.