Sounds like the definition of fear, to me.
But whadda I know?
Posted on 05/08/2021 4:27:30 PM PDT by A.M. Smith
A group of 57 leading scientists, doctors and policy experts has released a report calling in to question the safety and efficacy of the current COVID-19 vaccines and are now calling for an immediate end to all vaccine programs. We urge you to read and share this damning report.
There are two certainties regarding the global distribution of Covid-19 vaccines. The first is that governments and the vast majority of the mainstream media are pushing with all their might to get these experimental drugs into as many people as possible. The second is that those who are willing to face the scorn that comes with asking serious questions about vaccines are critical players in our ongoing effort to spread the truth.
You can read an advanced copy of this manuscript in preprint below. It has been prepared by nearly five dozen highly respected doctors, scientists, and public policy experts from across the globe to be urgently sent to world leaders as well as all who are associated with the production and distribution of the various Covid-19 vaccines in circulation today.
(Excerpt) Read more at en-volve.com ...
Still using my “I’m not wearing any underwear, either” reply.
People just shut up.
:D
Anthony Fauci *FUNDED* the development at Wuhan after the trials under Dr. Ralph Baric at UNC were discontinued / made to quit; this was IIRC back in 2014-2015 or so.
Fauci also *reportedly* (I've been told but haven't looked it up) owns a number of related patents, and stock in companies like Moderna.
The CDC patented the SARS virus back ages ago, IIRC 2007 or so? (this was from patents.google.com, and one of the pro-VAX trolls called it a "left wing conspiracy site" to discredit it before I identified the source to him).
Moderna in their SEC filing with Wall Street last year, admitted their jab was an experimental gene therapy and that they were $1.74 billion in debt.
Pfizer just came out and said that mRNA injections would be a significant source of revenue going forward, even as they tried to extend the age for those receiving the boosters down to age 12 (for whom the fatality rate from the COOF is << 0.1%)
And Johns Hopkins School of public health war-gamed a new SARS virus including "right-wing opposition" to public health measures and new treatments, back in 2017. (Compare the recent editorial in Nature by an MD from Baylor who links "anti-vaxxers" to "right wing supremacists who spread disinformation about the 2020 election".)
There's something worse than a conspiracy theorist.
That something is a coincidence theorist.
Sounds like the definition of fear, to me.
But whadda I know?
Prove me wrong.
I guess the doctor is not in.
“I giggle when I think of someone trembling in fear about vaccine dangers who then gets behind the wheel of the car. LOL”
I giggle when the public accepts the word of the pharma companies and Fauci at face value.
This drug is still experimental, the mRNA version has never been used on this scale. It was developed in months, not years like most, and for a virus that has a .03% chance of killing you.
I don’t buy the first of anything. There are always unknowns yet to be discovered. I’ve been in the software business for 40 years and I know the first version of anything is full of bugs. Just ask Bill Gates (about window).
Listen to this professor describe his concerns along with a host of other professors who wrote a public letter about their vaccine concerns. https://bit.ly/2Q0MMqO
A perfect example of an unknown is that the drug was never tested on those who have immune deficiencies. I am in that group along with millions of others. Four months after all of my doctors said to “take the vax” it was announced that it does not work for those who are immunosuppressed. Now, why wasn’t that explained when this was announced? What else do we not know?
What else have we not been told and what other unknowns await us in the months and years ahead?
It will be a cold day in hell before I fall prey to this crazy hype.
Excellent post.
“Read up on thalidomide.”
Thalidomide came out in 1957. It took four years for the full horror to come out. Babies born with flippers for arms, no arms, malformed legs, no limbs at all, malformed heads...and those are the ones that lived.
I’ve seen some thalidomide babies, what was done to them and their mothers was criminal.
I ain’t taking any vaccination that isn’t fully tested before release. I refuse to be a test case.
CDC reports that 3.1 million children 0-17 got the CV. 282 died. In the same time frame, 42,429 died from other causes.
Calm down, old woman.
You made the analogy that taking the vax was the same thing as driving, when you said this:
I giggle when I think of someone trembling in fear about vaccine dangers who then gets behind the wheel of the car. LOL
Now you want to upgrade your analogy to include drunk/drugged driving, which STILL isn't the same as purposefully injecting poison that can kill you all on its own and/or alter your genetic make-up and effect the future of an entire nation and the world.
Stop moving the goalposts and postulating ridiculous analogies.
You’re just full of yourself and your egotistical agenda.
What's an 'egotistical agenda'? An agenda that's 'all about me'?
Explain that one, por favor. What about my position on the fake covid vax is 'all about me'?
Or maybe you're just having trouble with your words today.
#DontHateParticipate
282/3,100,000=0.000091 or 0.009%.
The odds of dying from the vaccine for the general population of all ages is 0.003%.
I don't think very many people under the age of 17 have received the vaccine. But I'm guessing it will be lower than the 0.003% for all ages. And thus also lower than the 0.009% if someone under 17 gets covid..
😂 Spot on.
What does any of that have to do with the actual science behind the vaccines, and the many honest researchers who developed it?
If we never try anything new and perhaps sometimes risky, we will never progress. (When Ben Franklin wanted his own family inoculated through this very new science, it was pretty controversial then, too.)
I asked a question some weeks ago to which I don’t believe I ever received a response:
We’ve often seen complaints that the whole FDA approval process is too expensive, takes too long, and is just another example of excessive bureaucracy and government control; and that it adds drastically to the costs of R&D and the ultimate costs - financial and otherwise - to the consumer.
What would you, or anyone else here who fears the ‘experimental’ nature of the vaccine, suggest as an appropriate protocol/time period before a drug or vaccine can be considered no longer ‘experimental’?
Wait. Three men in white jackets told me seatbelts are the same as the rona vax, or they aren't the same.
I'm confused.
Maybe you have a link for this 'three men in white jackets' convo?
TIA.
No bagster. Said the critical care doctor.
I didn’t say the ‘I Giggle’ thing. That was someone else.
And I also don’t see where your evidence is that taking the vaccine is the same as ‘purposely injecting poison’.
Maybe you’ve had too much of your personal ‘poison’ tonight....
No, it’s common sense, not fear. I get a flu shot every year too. I had shingles this year. I’m going to get the shingles vaccine too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.