HUGE: Arizona GOP Leader Kelli Ward Sounds the Alarm – Dem Secretary of State Hobbs Is Sneaking Dem Operatives from Biased Org’s into Maricopa County Audit

Gateway Pundit ^ | May 2, 2021 | Joe Hoft

[Dr. Franklin]

She said a group of “experts”, (The Brennan Center and The Protect Democracy Group) wrote a letter asking the DOJ to send Federal monitors to “observe” the Arizona audit. She describes them as “aggressive, dirty, back-room players” who work with BLM and Marxist groups intent on destroying our nation.

Ward said that through a court-pushed agreement between the parties, “Arizona Secretary of State (SoS), Democrat Hack Katie Hobbs” gained access to the audit floor for three representatives. But now we have learned those “observers” monitoring the audit are not even from the SoS’s office. One is an “election consultant” with Protect Democracy, and the other is an attorney with The Brennan Center. Not coincidental, it happens to be the same Washington groups who urged the Feds to “monitor” the audit.

The move undermines Arizona sovereignty to oversee and administer their own elections and sets a dangerous precedent by injecting the Fed-connected groups.

During the last hearing, the court ordered the parties to work together and come to an agreement about providing the SoS access to monitor the audit, which they did. Now it looks as though the SoS took advantage of an agreement that was seemingly made in good faith, by pulling a “bait and switch”. Last week The Gateway Pundit posted the following statement regarding the audits:

[Dr. Franklin]

So, the courts refused to allow monitors to witness the acceptance of mail-in ballots and counting those ballors. Now, a corrupt Dem judge has ordered that the corrupt SoS must be permitted to have monitors of the audit long after the election was certified. If ever a court action was moot, this is it. Yet, that was ordered. They know what the auditors will find, and they also know that it is evidence for a petition for writ of quo warranto that the election returns are fraudulent.

[Gay State Conservative]

And this is surprising because...?

[joe fonebone]

This is so easy even a caveman can do it...
If they are not on the official role, or are not official state reps, throw them out.
make them sue.
Go to the discovery phase and find out who and what they are.
Publish said information, so everyone in the state knows who and what the sos is...

[Pollard]

The auditors also plan to triple their speed by hiring temp agency workers. I just shook my head when I heard that. Leftists will be flooding the temp agencies looking for work.

[Third Wheel]

The term “corrupt Dem judge” suggests there is such a thing as an honest Dem judge.

[rigelkentaurus]

Do what the Rats do every election cycle, eject them immediately and don’t let them back in.

[Blue Highway]

The GOP will lay cave on this BS and do nothing.

[Dr. Franklin]

The auditors also plan to triple their speed by hiring temp agency workers. I just shook my head when I heard that. Leftists will be flooding the temp agencies looking for work.

My understanding is that these people are just scanning the ballots and putting them under the UV light to check for watermarks or printers marks. I think the scanning is done three times per ballot. Otherwise, the actual fraud checking is done by Pultizer's software. I think it would be hard, but not impossible, to obstruct the scanning operation. More concerning is that these people are there to spy, and make frivolous claims in court, and to gather information for the next states in line for an audit.

[depressed in 06]

Anyone under Sniffer and the Ho are corrupt.

[Flick Lives]

This is so easy even a caveman can do it...
If they are not on the official role, or are not official state reps, throw them out.

—

Funny. I recall a video during the 2020 election counting where even after a court order to *allow* Republican observers in, the corrupt cops would not let them near to counting.

[DIRTYSECRET]

I’ll say it again. She’s a fighter. Run for Gov. Kelli. Senate is not winnable and Az. is no longer red enough for you. The next Governors race is a 50-50 proposition no matter who runs.

[ptsal]

NOT A GAME WINNING IDEA.

Know your neighbor at work.

[Revel]

That is how the dark side operates. Infiltration of everything. Been that way since the communist manifesto. The plan has been in place for many decades.

[tflabo]

It’s Sunday so some Scriptural references here on the topic of cheating measures.

Proverbs 20:10
Differing weights and differing measures,
Both of them are abominable to the Lord

Proverbs 20:23
Differing weights are an abomination to the Lord,
And a false scale is not good

Micah 6:11
“Can I justify wicked scales
And a bag of deceptive weights?

[Pollard]

AZ ballots didn’t have watermarks according to the audit guy in an interview. I think their looking for just something different with the UV lights. It probably highlights the grain of the paper.

They’re visually inspecting for printed bubbles as opposed to hand filled.

They’re looking for mail in ballots with no fold marks in them.

Don’t know if UV light would help with that.

But yeah, tripling the staff with temp workers? Doesn’t seem safe. Dems could get in there and just ignore any discrepancies.

And as you say, gain intel.

[Dave W]

They are being hand counted and not scanned.

[fidelis]

” My understanding is that these people are just scanning the ballots and putting them under the UV light to check for watermarks or printers marks. I think the scanning is done three times per ballot. Otherwise, the actual fraud checking is done by Pultizer's software. I think it would be hard, but not impossible, to obstruct the scanning operation. More concerning is that these people are there to spy, and make frivolous claims in court, and to gather information for the next states in line for an audit.”

Exactly. Given the safeguards in place, there’s little danger that these “operatives” can substantially affect the outcome of the audit, but there is no reason to allow blatantly hostile spies in to gather intel to try and undermine to process in the public and legal arenas.

[Dr. Franklin]

AZ ballots didn’t have watermarks according to the audit guy in an interview. I think their looking for just something different with the UV lights. It probably highlights the grain of the paper.

I suspect they are looking for fluorescence from the UV light. That could be for different things. One thing they are checking for is printer's marks on the ballots which may have been used for aligning the scan fields for the bubbles. If the bubbles weren't in the right places the machines couldn't read them. Thus, they would have been sent for "adjudication". The hand recounts will show how honestly those adjudications were done.

[Dr. Franklin]

They are being hand counted and not scanned.

I believe they are being hand counted, checked with UV light, AND scanned.

[vigilante2]

Make them stay in the lobby and board up the windows