Skip to comments.HUGE ARIZONA UPDATE: Desired Data Collected from the Voting Machines for Forensic Audit – Machines Are Ready for Handover Back to Maricopa County
Posted on 04/30/2021 7:57:33 PM PDT by bitt
The machines selected for review in the 2020 Election audit in Maricopa County are being packed up for a handover back to the County. Reporter Brahm Resnik in Phoenix reported this afternoon that the voting machines obtained for the audit were being packed up for transport. He insinuated that it must be due to the Democrat Secretary of State’s observer being onsite yesterday.
NOW Maricopa County’s ballot-counting machines & related computers & servers are being packed up at Senate Republicans’ audit site for return to county, per county elections spox. No reason given. Comes day after SoS observer for machines showed up. pic.twitter.com/e4lZEzx2uh
— Brahm Resnik (@brahmresnik) April 30, 2021
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
BREAKING: Arizona Officials Increase the Number of Tables at Veterans Memorial Coliseum to Speed Up Forensic Audit… Update: FROM 20 to 46 Overnight!
What’s the hurry?
If a counting/tabulating fault can be demonstrated it will need to be demonstrated multiple times and nobodys testimony will ever be believed.
So you can be pulled over by a police officer for reasonable cause, but this audit can’t be carried out for the same reasons
Just a reminder - there is no statute of limitations on voter fraud.
The reason why they are being sent back is for chain of custody. They have probably already cloned the drives and will be doing the analysis bon those. There is no need to keep the original machines.
The hurry is they had only counted 100,000 ballots as of the 29th. They have ~2 million more to count by May 15th when the ballots are released back to the county.
That is a refreshing thought
Just like Uncle Joes votes!
The auditors are pullling a play out of the same playbook the Dems used to run the clock out on President Trump's efforts to stop the steal.
The legal system has a pace and that pace is difficult to accelerate and easy to stall.
No doubt the presiding judge would love to torpedo the audit and it's. certain he will do what he can in his power to shut down and sabotage the audit.
That will take several weeks to work it's way through the courts and by that the ballots will be totaled, the results will be in and the initial results released to the public.
The best the judge can do at that point is try to seal the results and shut down any follow up analysis or investigation .
Then it will be a fight in the court of pubic opinion and the judges orders will not be very significant.
The Dems are fully aware of this and you can see them shifting their effort from trying to win in legal court to trying to set the narrative, shape the message and win the battle in court of public opinion
Problem is, regardless of what they say or admit, at this point the vast majority of people are pretty sure the election was stolen, they just don't have outright proof or know all the details of how the steal was done.
It just comes down to whether you support the stolen election, you oppose it or you are sitting on the fence. The audit's purpose is to convince the fence sitters and motivate them to oppose the steal. .
It would be nice though to rerun the machine tabulation AFTER they have a verified hand count of all the ballots. We might be able to watch any shenanigans live.
Are there personnel to staff those tables?
What I don’t get is that this is only a portion of the entire state. Will the senate then have any rationale to extrapolate those results to the rest of the state, or will a full state forensic audit then be necessary for any action to be taken?
OK, that is not at all what I have been watching... there are still pallets of boxes full that have not been cracked open yet.
Shared earlier this morning, live feed from the counting site.
In the story there’s a tweet suggesting that the machines will require recertification. If the machines cannot be hacked why would they ever need to be recertified?
This audit won’t change the resukt, it is too look at a significant popylation, and test the accuracy and legality.
This audit won’t change the result, it is to look at a significant population, and test the accuracy and legality.
I really do not follow your argument, at all.
If turnabout is fair play, Then those voting machines should be retained by the auditing Authority for time unspecified and indefinite. I am only speaking about the single topic of the machines. If there is a counting or tabulating anomaly in those machines, and they are returned to an Authority whom we probably believe, both of us, is corrupt at worst, but certainly interested in maintaining their “the election was legit” opinion and having it ratified by the audit, the ability to demonstrate that counting anomaly in a court of law, or on a live video feed will probably disappear. Additionally, there are unquestionably other machines , and if it can be shown that the single machine now in possession of the auditing Authority behaves differently then those other machines, this would cast a heavy suspicion on the Integrity of those machines. If the (mis)behavior of those machines is considered evidence, evidence in a legal trial is generally not returned to the owner of same until well after the trial occurs and appeals have been exhausted or settled.
I have no particular opinion as to whether those machines were deliberately programmed to accentuate or over count Democrat votes. I believe that most if not all of the fraud in the election occurred due to the submission of fraudulent absentee ballots. But I do not know that, it is only my opinion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.