The auditors are pullling a play out of the same playbook the Dems used to run the clock out on President Trump's efforts to stop the steal.
The legal system has a pace and that pace is difficult to accelerate and easy to stall.
No doubt the presiding judge would love to torpedo the audit and it's. certain he will do what he can in his power to shut down and sabotage the audit.
That will take several weeks to work it's way through the courts and by that the ballots will be totaled, the results will be in and the initial results released to the public.
The best the judge can do at that point is try to seal the results and shut down any follow up analysis or investigation .
Then it will be a fight in the court of pubic opinion and the judges orders will not be very significant.
The Dems are fully aware of this and you can see them shifting their effort from trying to win in legal court to trying to set the narrative, shape the message and win the battle in court of public opinion
Problem is, regardless of what they say or admit, at this point the vast majority of people are pretty sure the election was stolen, they just don't have outright proof or know all the details of how the steal was done.
It just comes down to whether you support the stolen election, you oppose it or you are sitting on the fence. The audit's purpose is to convince the fence sitters and motivate them to oppose the steal. .
What I don’t get is that this is only a portion of the entire state. Will the senate then have any rationale to extrapolate those results to the rest of the state, or will a full state forensic audit then be necessary for any action to be taken?
I really do not follow your argument, at all.
If turnabout is fair play, Then those voting machines should be retained by the auditing Authority for time unspecified and indefinite. I am only speaking about the single topic of the machines. If there is a counting or tabulating anomaly in those machines, and they are returned to an Authority whom we probably believe, both of us, is corrupt at worst, but certainly interested in maintaining their “the election was legit” opinion and having it ratified by the audit, the ability to demonstrate that counting anomaly in a court of law, or on a live video feed will probably disappear. Additionally, there are unquestionably other machines , and if it can be shown that the single machine now in possession of the auditing Authority behaves differently then those other machines, this would cast a heavy suspicion on the Integrity of those machines. If the (mis)behavior of those machines is considered evidence, evidence in a legal trial is generally not returned to the owner of same until well after the trial occurs and appeals have been exhausted or settled.
I have no particular opinion as to whether those machines were deliberately programmed to accentuate or over count Democrat votes. I believe that most if not all of the fraud in the election occurred due to the submission of fraudulent absentee ballots. But I do not know that, it is only my opinion.
...........................
Most people are too stupid to do their own research. They have to be spoon fed. Those who can spoon feed them are never allowed access to media that can get the job done.
If they dont have the info than they can blame FNC,Hannity,talk radio,all those that should have had many of those who are risking it all to get the right info.
How many times have we seen Juan O Savin,Kerry Cassidy,Charlie Ward, or Simon Parkes on TV? I don't remember seeing any of them ever and they are the ones who have the intel know the skinny can tell the world what is going on yet we never see them now why not?!!