China's Strength Should Be Evaluated Without Emotion

Advancing Time ^ | 03/17/2021 | Bruce Wilds

[SeekAndFind]

China's strength must be questioned by people without an agenda if we truly wish to understand the world. In the same way, the strength of the Soviet Union was overestimated before its fall in December of 1991 or the Japanese economy from 1986 to 1991, today people tend to exaggerate the strength of China. When Japan's massive bubble burst in early 1992, its real estate and stock market prices crashed causing the "lost decades" and the problems that still haunt them today. It seems Americans tend to supersize anything they can conjure up as a challenge to their supremacy. This is evident in the number of confidence crushing-articles being published with titles such as "The US Keeps Losing In Every Simulated War-Game Against China." 

  “in the night, imagining some fear, How easy is a bush supposed a bear!” ― William Shakespeare, A Midsummer Night's …

The world's economy has many moving parts, it exists in a fog which makes it difficult to evaluate what is unfolding. Intertwined with the economy is the financial system, which is vast and complex, and broken political systems. This makes it difficult to get a handle on how strong various parts of these systems are, to make matters worse, these systems are held hostage by propaganda machines operating on political agendas that are constantly changing. Much of this is operated by people lurking in the shadows. When all is said and done it would be wise not to believe much of what you read, hear and even see. A few years back, many people marked China's economy as surpassing that of America, but oddly enough, America is still rated as number one.

China Has Created A Record Amount Of New Loans

China has long been strategically positioning itself to fight what could be viewed as a war to displace America as the world's leading nation. Deeply rooted in its efforts are a number of individuals that stand to profit in the short-term.  For this reason, it would be fair to consider China as a far greater threat to America than Russia, however, China does have some major problems.

While China continues to tell the world that it is taking steps to deleverage its indebted financial system, in January, China created a staggering, record 3.58 trillion in new yuan loans. This surpasses the previous record of 3.340 trillion set just before the Chinese economy shut down due to covid-19. It could be argued that only gargantuan credit injections have prevented a total economic collapse in the world's second-largest economy and only ever greater credit injections are keeping China alive. This underlines the fact that size should never be interpreted as strength.

Guo Shuqing, chairman of the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission and central bank party secretary, has pointed out that bubbles in U.S. and European markets could burst because their rallies are heading in the opposite direction of their underlying economies. This could have been said to divert eyes from China's own massive financial bubble. By all indications, China's financial system stands at more than twice the size of that in the U.S. This could be why the CBIRC recently capped bank lending to the property market, slashed shadow banking activities, and unwound a wild expansion in peer-to-peer lending.

Money Continues To Be Injected Into Its System

Of course, it isn't  just China's new loans we should be looking at. The broadest Chinese credit aggregate, "Total Social Financing" which includes new loans as well as shadow debt creation and bond issuance has also exploded. Not long ago, a monstrous 5.170 trillion yuan or roughly $800 billion was injected into China's economy in just one month. 

Weeks ago, Economist, Daniel Lacalle noted in a video that much of the bullish talk about 2021 is linked to a recovery in China which is supported by very optimistic estimates of growth in services and exports. Lacalle then goes on to point out the details in the official February Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) show a different picture. The data coming out, especially in services and exports, is inconsistent with the 6% GDP growth most analysts expect for 2021.

One of the takeaways from the recent annual National People’s Congress in Beijing is a conservative growth goal, with tighter fiscal-deficit targets and restrained monetary settings. That’s a big contrast with Washington, where President Joe Biden is already preparing another major fiscal package after just signing into law his giant $1.9 trillion relief package. The Chinese and all export geared nations are most likely giddy at the prospect of American consumers about to buy the products they manufacture and the boost it will bring to their economy.

Other issues cloud this complicated picture, these include such things as the strength of a country's political structure, institutions, money flows, the quality of its underlying assets. Also, how dependent its economy is upon other nations. These feed into the idea of resilience when put under pressure. Money flows have become massively important in our modern where huge amounts of wealth can flow across porous borders and flee a country in the blink of an eye. This is where corruption, a free press, and a strong legal system show how important they are in our lives. 

It is difficult to ignore that both China and Japan for years have been busy supporting zombie companies and not allowing them to fail in an effort to convince the world all is well. These countries are strongly linked and both very big players in the global economy, their unsustainable path forward, means if either falters, the other will be pressured. A case could be made that artificially low-interest rates in Europe and America are also allowing companies in those regions to remain standing long after they should cease to exist. China also is rapidly losing its edge as a low-cost producer. 

Many foreign companies that once relied on China’s cheap labor to produce their goods have moved their factories to Southeast Asian countries such as Vietnam, Bangladesh, and India, where operating costs are lower. While claims that higher U.S. productivity and rising operating costs in China will close the cost gap between manufacturing in China versus the United States the idea American firms will bring jobs back to America are far too optimistic. Even if major multinationals like Nike Inc., Adidas AG, Nikon Corp., and Microsoft Corp. have closed down their Chinese factories due to rising costs, America is not where these factories and jobs are going. Many are slated to move to countries linked to China by its OROB.

In an effort to keep this article from growing too lengthy, I will immediately address a few other key points. One is about how rapidly expanding credit in China is spilling over into the global market and driving up the price of assets and commodities. Another has to do with human rights and how for decades China has been pushing its people towards a more "homogeneous way of thinking."This includes totalitarian efforts to make its people march in line. The ruling Communist Party in China has built "re-education camps" in an attempt to bring these people into the “modern, civilized” world promote what the government calls “ethnic unity.” 

In simpler terms, the apparent goal is to force detainees to embrace the Chinese communist party and an effort to fully control the hearts and minds of its population. Whether what could be called "group think" strengthens or weakens a country is up for debate. Understanding the core nature of China is important to comprehend the lack of flexibility ingrained in their system. This comes in the ideology that directs its actions. China is still very much a communist country, and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) controls everything. From indoctrinating children with Party slogans to requiring companies with more than 50 employees to have Party liaisons, the military and other areas of the country have similar programs.

China Is Building A Slew Of Cutting-Edge Weaponry

We should not forget, China is our rival. China's state-run economy is based on a business model that is geared to expand by crushing the competition. The One Road One Belt initiative is rapidly expanding its footprint in undeveloped nations and expanding the use of its currency while China builds a powerful military. China's unflexible path forward guarantees conflict and this is one of several reasons they represent more of a threat to America than Russia. All of the above gives credence to the idea that at some point China and America are headed towards serious conflict.

China has no intention of being locked into producing low-end manufacturing of basic goods but is determined to move into high-tech products. China's plan centers around both state-owned and private firms investing in and acquiring foreign companies to steal their technological innovations. Subsidizing those companies working within its system in a multitude of ways helps China achieve this goal. Countries that export goods at slightly below cost in exchange for manufacturing jobs are not stupid they are predatory and America and the rest of the world are their prey.

Footnote;  The articles below also explore modern China.

https://brucewilds.blogspot.com/2020/09/chinas-rapidly-expanding-credit-affects.html 
https://brucewilds.blogspot.com/2020/11/china-has-plan-and-we-are-not-in-it.html    
https://brucewilds.blogspot.com/2020/01/chinas-cultural-group-think-is-worth.html

[TigersEye]

China's Strength Should Be Evaluated Without Emotion

That sounds like good advice for all foreign policy. Domestic policies too for that matter.

But I don't think the Manson Family currently occupying the White House can do anything without emotion.

[Brian Griffin]

“In the same way, the strength of the Soviet Union was overestimated before its fall in December of 1991 or the Japanese economy from 1986 to 1991, today people tend to exaggerate the strength of China.”

I might have owned a few postage stamps and books printed in Russia back in 1991.

China fills the shelves of Wal-Mart except the food and personal care sections and parts of the gardening and automotive sections.

[Brian Griffin]

The US economy is run on scams like the PPACA that can have you pays millions of dollars for drugs for a single person in just one year.

I was just looking at the Florida Building Code about two hours ago. It’s enough to make your head spin.

[SeekAndFind]

The main difference between the USSR and China are these:

1) The USSR was NOT capitalistic, in was pure socialism. China uses capitalism under the control of the Communist regime.

2) China has 4 times America’s population. The USSR’s population was MUCH LESS than the USA.

3) We did not have anything manufactured in the Soviet Union. Today, we have practically MOST THINGS that we buy made in China ( including key technological components and medicines ).

4) The Soviet Union did not own America’s debt. China owns a huge chunk of our debt.

[Brian Griffin]

We have a stupid President that just promised the equivalent of running half the houses and motor vehicles on renewable/nuclear energy in about eight and a half years.

We can’t build a nuclear plant that fast.

Solar cells are made in China and there is no guarantee that they will sell us the ~10 billion high-output solar panels needed to meet Joe’s pledge, never mind the rare earth metals needed for ~100 million high-horsepower electric car motors.

[central_va]

I feel like a traitor every time I am forced to buy a made in China product because there is not one made in the USA . I hate that. I hate globalism.

[RoosterRedux]

Bkmk

[SeekAndFind]

Then you should be supporting the business of MyPillow’s Mike Lindell.

He was approached by Chinese businessman sometime back to have his pillows manufactured in China but he refused, preferring to make them in America and create jobs here.

[Brian Griffin]

“both China and Japan for years have been busy supporting zombie companies”

Their zombie companies mainly pay their own way.

Our welfare recipients are generally near total leeches.

[central_va]

I support across the board import tariffs NOW!!!

[Brian Griffin]

I bought some pillows recently.

The outers were weaved and sewn in China.

The outers were then stuffed in the USA, sewn shut and placed in plastic bags.

[Brian Griffin]

I believe the majority of imports from China are tariffed at substantial percentages like ~25%.

[rlmorel]

I’m with you on that.

[Brian Griffin]

When I left to go to college in the 1970’s the New Jersey Turnpike was lined with chemical factories for dozens of miles.

They’re pretty much gone.

[Brian Griffin]

“built ‘re-education camps’ in an attempt to bring these people into the “modern, civilized” world promote what the government calls ‘ethnic unity.’”

The Chinese government has become more heavy-handed.

There is an old Western saying: “Let sleeping dogs lie.”

[familyop]

"It seems Americans tend to supersize anything they can conjure up as a challenge to their supremacy."

LOL!

[Starcitizen]

Then you should be supporting the business of MyPillow’s Mike Lindell.
——————
Great if I need pillows and bedding. Not much else out there from non-woke, non-communist Chinese companies

(LG and Samsung are two companies that pulled all manufacturing out of China)

[MadMax, the Grinning Reaper]

If the Red Chinese were to launch a war anywhere in Asia or even against the US, they won’t give a damn about their casualties (which they can afford in both a non-nuclear war and a nuclear war). The same for economic “debt” etc.

They’ve got enough people to rebuild while we’re still burying our dead and putting whole islands/cities off limits due to the destruction and nuclear radiation.

They have only 3 years to make their move while ComSymp Biden/Harris/Kerry and their surrender monkeys are in power. Less time if the Republicans retake the House in 2022.

Only time will tell.

[central_va]

I believe the majority of imports from China are tariffed at substantial percentages like ~25%.

No. Let me explain.

They are part of the $250 billion worth of Chinese goods that the U.S. hit with tariffs last year. It was not immediately clear how large a portion of the overall tariffs is covered by the exclusions. The exemptions stem from more than 1,100 exclusion requests made by companies and other entities in the United States, according to the documents.

Let me interpret this for you. We import over $500B/yr form China. So half comes in duty free. The other half tariff'ed at I think around 8%. So the revenue generated is around 20-25B with an effective tariff rate of < 4%.