Why Trump Failed to Drain the Swamp

YouTube ^ | 4/1/21 | Patrick Rooney

[rebuildus]

Patrick Rooney, Founder of Old School™ (Natural Health / Success / Freedom) discusses the real reason President Trump failed to "drain the swamp," and thus safeguard America. Your comments are welcome.

Old School https://oldschoolus.com​

Dr. Fauci's Promotion of Gain of Function Research May Have Contributed to COVID-19 Pandemic

https://nationalsecurity.news/2020-06-29-faucis-promotion-of-gain-of-function-research-contributed-to-pandemic.html

Trump Torches "self-promoters" Fauci, Birx Over Coronavirus Response

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/mar/29/donald-trump-torches-anthony-fauci-deborah-birx-ov/

[Kevmo]

No I will not read Qanonsense posts on this subject because q=Bullshiite.

You qpee dolls were PROVEN wrong on Biden’s inauguration day and what did you jerks do? You opened a Qanonsense bugzapper thread.

Buzz off. You guys are unhealthy for FR and for conservatism.

[Auslander154]

How can we blame Trump when even we were fooled and taken in?

We thought Barr and Durham were the real deal; at least I did.
I trusted Cotton too.

Trump couldn’t have drained the Swamp, but he could have saved himself a world of hurt by not firing Michael Flynn and not hiring Sessions. I liked Sessions too, but didn’t realize he would be so weak and fold the way he did.

A president needs to start off with an Attorney General that is his wing man.
Would the Senate have approved Corey Lewandowski ?
Or Peter Navarro, a faithful Trumper ?
Or Stephen Miller? Or Joe DiGenova?
Mark Levin would never have made it through the Senate.
I would have loved to see Devin Nunes as his Attorney General, but then I never heard of him until Russia Gate reared its head.
How about Victor Davis Hanson? Would he have taken the job?

Who would have been the most loyal Trump appointee that would have cleared the Senate? Trump felt he owed Sessions a favor, and most thought he would be loyal too.
The Deep State is so deep that even Freepers like me were taken in by men I thought were honorable.

[bagster]

No I will not read Qanonsense posts on this subject because q=Bullshiite.

Then be resigned to saying stupid crap like is posted on this threa for all eternity.

You people have no clue about what Trump did or what is going on behind the scenes.

Your babbling is child-like in its innocence, yet you somehow think you know things and are so very wise.

If you close your eyes to the truth, your open mouth will spew forth ignorance and lies.

So it has been written, so it is known.

p.s. Dangerous? Your collective ignorance and blockading of the Q op is what is dangerous for FR and America.

p.p.s. If Q is 'bullshite' as you say, how is it that I know with perfect assurance how full of 'shite' 98% of the posts on this thread are hey?

[going hot]

That’s because you have strong sense-fu and a functioning brain with actual cells that transmit and receive impulses, with which you then create original thought.

[Captain Peter Blood]

I don’t think Reagan would have done anything. He was never as Conservative as thought.

[Kevmo]

I am NOT “you people”. I habe my own views and ran my own President Trump Channel on DISQUS from 2015 until we were deplatformed.

You qpee dolls are simply jerks.

[Kevmo]

All you qpee dolls ever do is argue from silence, a classic fallacy.

You were PROVEN wrong on inauguration day so suck it up, buttercup.

[bagster]

I am NOT “you people”.

Yea, you kinda are.

I habe (sic) my own views and ran my own President Trump Channel on DISQUS from 2015 until we were deplatformed.

So? How is that relevant to the conversation?

You qpee dolls are simply jerks.

We may be, but we didn't work against Trump's attempt to take down the derp state, like you 'non-jerks' did and still do and then come on FR and badmouth his efforts after helping to derail them.

[bagster]

All you qpee dolls ever do is argue from silence, a classic fallacy.

Oh, is that all we ever do? I was unaware. ThankQ.

You were PROVEN wrong on inauguration day...

I'm afraid not.

...so suck it up, buttercup.

If 'sucking it up' entails having to listen to you people set the narrative that Trump was a 'lovable but incompetent loser' when you people are partially responsible for his so-called 'demise', then no. There will be no 'sucking it up' over here. I will resist.

I will always and forever blame you people for the shameful thing you did and are STILL doing.

Suck THAT up.

[bagster]

That’s because you have strong sense-fu and a functioning brain with actual cells that transmit and receive impulses, with which you then create original thought.

Holla.

[Kevmo]

STFU with this ‘you people’ bullshiite. If I didn’t say it and you’re arguing against it, then it’s a straw argument.

You should just go back to your precious protected Q threads because your shiite don’t fly on normal threads where we get a clean shot at you.

[Kevmo]

No I kinda am not. How many other Trumplicans are you limpwristedly arguing against who had a President Trump Channel with 275k followers? NONE.

But you are less than uniQue as a Qrap-thrower.

[jy8z]

[Kevmo]

When on this thread did I badmouth Trump? Here’s a hint: I didn’t, buttQraQ.

But I am badmouthing you QraQheads.

[Kevmo]

Trump should have “promoted” Sessions to DHS the moment he recused himself. I said so at the time.

DHS is a bigger department anyways and probably more suited to his good ole boy approach.

For attorney General you need a fighter like Jay Sekulow. Even tootufruityrudy woulda done better than Sessions.

[bagster]

STFU with this ‘you people’ bullshiite.

I'm not known for S'ingTFU. Ask around.

When I say 'you people', I'm referring to you people who have no knowledge of Trump's Q efforts and then are arrogant enough to form opinions without having that knowledge.

You are one of those.

Therefore, 'you people'. Own it.

[bagster]

You should just go back to your precious protected Q threads because your shiite don’t fly on normal threads where we get a clean shot at you.

I go where I please. I bring my enlightenment to you peoples' 'normal threads' as a service to mankind. Rather than spit on me, you should thank me. And maybe give me money.

#DontHateAppreciate

[bagster]

No I kinda am not. How many other Trumplicans are you limpwristedly arguing against who had a President Trump Channel with 275k followers? NONE.

So, this makes you special in some way? A man can have a President Trump channel with 275k (or a million) followers and still not have an understanding of things as they are. You join the ranks of 'you people' when you have a large hole in your knowledge, like you do with your ignorance of Trump's Q operation.

See, it colors your perspective on EVERYTHING.

Now, do I expect you to understand and agree with that? Of course not. How could you if you can't accept the Q op as reality?

You will be 'you people' for as long as you have an incomplete picture, no matter how many followers you have.

[bagster]

Below average memeage.

[bagster]

When on this thread did I badmouth Trump? Here’s a hint: I didn’t, buttQraQ.

You hear what you want to hear. This is what I said to you:

Then be resigned to saying stupid crap like is posted on this threa for all eternity.

That is not me saying you PERSONALLY DIRECTLY badmouthed Trump. But lemme break it down for you.

You are among the ranks of those on this thread who are badmouthing Trump without the knowledge of his true efforts (Q). Your particular sin is in badmouthing Q, which, as we all know, was and is a Trump authorized, alt-comm, psyop.

So, if we use mathematical logic, to badmouth Q is to badmouth Trump.

Ya folla?

But I am badmouthing you QraQheads.

It is known.

(see above)