Posted on 03/26/2021 3:59:05 PM PDT by White Lives Matter
Laura Ingraham sometimes is off base – last night was one of those times.
.... Snip....
She gave up on President Trump as soon as the 2020 election was stolen by the Biden gang. She either didn’t have the courage to stand up to FOX Executives or she didn’t have the wits to see what was happening. But within hours Laura was already moving on with the corrupt Biden gang. Because of this, her viewership is half what it was.
In her interview with the President last night, she rudely cut off the President of the United States when he tried to share the facts about the election being stolen.
President Trump shared the following:
And what they did was absolutely disgraceful and if you look at the numbers, the numbers were vastly in favor of us in the Presidential election. It was disgraceful that they were able to get away with it and the Supreme Court didn’t have the courage to do what they had to do.
To which Laura rudely interrupts and says:
Yeah, well speaking as a, speaking as a lawyer, we’re not going to relitigate the past tonight. But speaking as a lawyer I think that going forward, I think any candidate running for office has to have a heck of a legal strategy in place before, like long before the election takes place.
That was it. What an absolute outrage. Ingraham sides with FOX News executives. She blames the President for the Democrats stealing the election. She ignores and shuts down the President. She claims a better legal strategy will prevent massive Democrat fraud – when the courts refuse to hear the President’s cases.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
You don’t think a press conference clearly showing the evidence would not have been effective??
Weren’t there many instances of the evidence being put out there?
I see your point.
But I feel that President Trump was trying to let it play out by the rules. Something he did throughout his Presidency on a range of issues.
Some of his lawyers identified something like 42,000 people that voted twice in Nevada. That was common knowledge. The courts in Nevada and elsewhere ignored that and refused to hear the real evidence.
A guy in Georgia hacked a voting machine while he was testifying about voter fraud and hacking the machines, they said couldn’t be hacked. And they still allowed the machines to be used.
He shared with me some info that was pretty detailed in format about events that were supposed to happen the first week in January of this year.
I told him if ANY of those events transpired I'd buy him lunch.
I still have my lunch money.
I will say I wish I didn't though.
In either case the scenario would make for a great book.
Thanks Sapwolf.
That is an excellent summation by Right_in_Virginia. The best that I’ve seen.
Your post made me remember to bookmark it
Thank you!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.