You don’t think a press conference clearly showing the evidence would not have been effective??
Weren’t there many instances of the evidence being put out there?
I see your point.
But I feel that President Trump was trying to let it play out by the rules. Something he did throughout his Presidency on a range of issues.
Some of his lawyers identified something like 42,000 people that voted twice in Nevada. That was common knowledge. The courts in Nevada and elsewhere ignored that and refused to hear the real evidence.
A guy in Georgia hacked a voting machine while he was testifying about voter fraud and hacking the machines, they said couldn’t be hacked. And they still allowed the machines to be used.