Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HG Wells: The Open Conspiracy: Rebellion against God on earth
Biblical News Christians Jews ^ | 03/24/2021 | The Editor

Posted on 03/24/2021 3:22:15 PM PDT by inpajamas

In 1928, HG Wells penned a book entitled, The Open Conspiracy: Blue Print for World Revolution. The similarities between what we find contained in Wells's book which was written almost 100 years ago, to what has transpired since, and to that which we can observe unfolding before us today, are uncanny. The conclusion of his ideas is the call for the overthrow of the present world order, and the creation of a world-state, which, we can observe playing out in our world today.  Not only so, but Wells laid out a very specific plan to bring about the destruction of the current institutions and replace them with a global system of world rule..Indeed! For Wells's writings from more than ninety years past in many ways create a more precise picture of society today and of where things are heading, than you will find exposed by mainstream media outlets, which actually are following his plan. 

“Thy kingdom come, Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven”. - Matthew 6:10-13

Whereas false religions and gods are substitutes devised to supplant God, the modern so called “progressive” movement seeks to become God. First, by eliminating the true knowledge of God; and secondly, by destroying the evidence of the past, they propose to create a future wherein they sit in a seat of authority in God's stead in denial of His Power and Authority. This is the spirit of anti-Christ.

Global Socialism, Population and Birth Control [Comments appear in brackets]

Wells states: “. . . Now the most comprehensive conception of this new world is of one politically, socially, and economically unified. Within that frame fall all the other ideas of our progressive ambition. . . ” - [Wells defined himself as a “Liberal Fascist”. He worked for decades to promote and plan a global socialist order subject to "progressive" ideology with no room for any other.

Wells: “….we are writing for the modern-minded, and for them it is impossible to think of the world as secure and satisfactory until there exists a single world commonweal, preventing war and controlling those moral, biological, and economic forces and wastages that would otherwise lead to wars. - [George Soros, has called for the same, "We must mobilize civil society in favor of international law and international institutions." (Soros is the founder of the Open Society Institute).  certainly, there are many more voices now calling for the same and becoming increasingly louder]

Wells continues: “. . .The security of creative progress and creative activity implies a competent regulation of the economic life in the collective interest. There must be food, shelter and leisure for all. The fundamental needs of the animal life must be assured before human life can have free play.” - [Totally the socialist agenda today, sometimes referred to as a “Great Reset”—a social-welfare world-state supported by global taxation and redistribution. By necessity such requires a totalitarian system of management. Where do you find the "angels" who can be trusted with such vast powers to preside over all of humanity in righteousness?]

Wells: “. . .Nature ensures a pressure of population through passions and instincts that, given sufficient knowledge, intelligence, and freedom on the part of women, can be satisfactorily gratified and tranquilized, if need be, without the production of numerous children. Very slight adjustments in social and economic arrangements will, in a world of clear available knowledge and straightforward practice in these matters, supply sufficient inducement or discouragement to affect the general birth rate or the birth rate of specific types as the directive sense of the community may consider desirable” - [Right out of Margaret Sanger's playbook: Planned Parenthood, abortion centers, eugenics, and social engineering, to produce, "specific types" of children deemed, "desirable".  Both a very "Hitlerian" and “progressive” concept.]

Wells: “. . .Intelligent control of population is a possibility which puts man outside competitive processes that have hitherto ruled the modification of species, and he can be released from these processes in no other way. There is a clear hope that, later, directed breeding will come within his scope……..the world community of our desires, the organized world community conducting and ensuring its own progress, requires a deliberate collective control of population as a primary condition.” - [Bill Gates is onboard with that, along with The United Nations, and a multitude of "progressive" NGOs, and other high profile individuals, and many politicians, who vigorously support this agenda allowing for selective genocide of the unborn and other unfits. Wells would have been proud.]

Wells continues: “. . .The reasonable desire of all of us is that we should have the collective affairs of the world managed by suitably equipped groups of the most interested, intelligent, and devoted people.” - [An authoritarian world state ruled by an oligarchy of elitist described by Plato as, "philosopher kings" – think, NWO, Great Reset]

Comments

When envisioning a world such as the one Wells imagined, one might do well to consider others who in the past imagined their vision to be good and who held similar philosophies and ambitions: 

 ". . . [W]e shall create an unprecedented centralization which will unite all powers in the hands of the government we shall create a hierarchical constitution, which will mechanically govern all movements of individuals." - Point #25 from the Nazi Party's 25 Point Constitution.

Such are the ideas of the Corporate-Industrial Complex complex exerting control today.  The only real difference between fascism today and then is the color; yesterday's fascism came in red and black today it comes in pink.

A New Godless Religion

When reading the chapters in The Open Conspiracy which relate to religion, it is easier to grasp Wells's conceptions if one understands his background as a student of evolutionary biology under the man known as "Darwin's Bulldog", T. H. Huxley.

Wells's perceptions of religion are based on evolution, and refers to a modern religion which is a Godless one. He acknowledges mankind’s spiritual impulses, nevertheless, he saw traditional religions and belief in God as inventions through which these impulses express themselves in a primitive manner.

Wells does not, however, advocate for the abolishment of established religions at once, but rather, in time, to slowly convert society over to a modern atheistic religion of enlightenment. Wells saw spiritual impulses as useful, if the underlying inspirational forces could be harnessed to build a secular world state. Wells realized that trying to abolish religion as it was at the time as a futile attempt, nevertheless, he believed that through a natural process of education and enlightenment (propaganda), secular ideology would gradually supersede present religious faiths.

It was Wells's belief that as man evolved to the next level of awareness, he would shed the mythical and superstitious beliefs which were merely crude symbols of an undeveloped spirituality. As this gradual awakening continued, traditional religions would become outdated myths and slowly fade out of existence. All of the energy, devotion, and hope that in the past found expression through religion would then be directed to the betterment of a secular society.

Wells failed, however, to acknowledge the intrinsic flaw of his modern secular religion—in a godless state, amorality rests solely upon the inherent goodness and judgment of mankind, and more specifically, as a vice to those principalities and powers who have the rule. All concepts of morality that are lacking an Absolute Eternal Authority, are subject to change and destine to become arbitrary.

Rejection of God to embrace supremacy of mankind

Wells: “. . . There was no Creation in the past, we begin to realize, but eternally there is creation; there was no Fall to account for the conflict of good and evil, but a stormy ascent. Life as we know it is a mere beginning.“ [Wells sees no God, merely physical, social, intellectual evolution -- The fool has said in his heart, "There is no God." -- Psalm 14:1]

“We have still barely emerged from among the animals in their struggle for existence. We live only in the early dawn of human self-consciousness and in the first awakening of the spirit of mastery.” [An imagined godless spiritual evolution a, "New Age enlightenment".]

Wells: “. . . It seems unavoidable that if religion is to develop unifying and directive power in the present confusion of human affairs it must adapt itself to this forward-looking, individuality-analyzing turn of mind; it must divest itself of its sacred histories, its gross preoccupations, its posthumous prolongation of personal ends. The desire for service, for subordination, for permanent effect, for an escape from the distressful pettiness and mortality of the individual life, is the undying element in every religious system.” - [Wells is forced to acknowledge religious impulses are intrinsic, and potentially constructive; however, he sees these impulses as being still in their primitive stages and being held in bondage to the myths they created, which myths pervert them. In Wells's mind, man is a god unto himself, but he has yet to fully evolve]

Wells: “. . . Religion is the antagonist of self” - [Mankind needs an inner, "antagonist" (conscience), to refrain from absolute selfishness, belief in God provides conviction of self.] 

Wells:  “. . . The time has come to strip religion right down to that, to strip it for greater tasks than it has ever faced before. The histories and symbols that served our fathers encumber and divide us. Sacraments and rituals harbor disputes and waste our scanty emotions…The first sentence in the modern creed must be, not “I believe,” but “I give myself.” - [Bottom line: Abolish God and embrace an atheistic religious devotion of self sacrifice to secular humanism and evolutionary advancement.  Problem: In a selfish narcissistic society, good luck with the, self sacrifice, part of that idea.]

Wells: “. . . As our eyes are opened to these things, we see ourselves as beings greater or less than the definitive self. Man's soul is no longer his own. It is, he discovers, part of a greater being which lived before he was born and will survive him. The idea of a survival of the definite individual with all the accidents and idiosyncrasies of his temporal nature upon him dissolves to nothing in this new view of immortality” - [Viewing all of mankind together as one collective immortal body, each person is but a cell which dies, but new cells are born to take their place and the body continues on—humanity is to become a modern New Age secular god, ever evolving and ascending, but whose existence in regards to the individual, is futile and vain.]

Conclusion

The so called progressive movement today is the movement Wells anticipated, wrote extensively about, and worked towards facilitating its future ascent. He stated it would come with, or without his work, for as he said, the mindset itself was the nature of the way things were going.

It is impossible to know the impact of Wells's personal efforts on today's society, however, much of what has taken place over the decades since Wells's time was calculated by Wells, but not just by Wells alone. Many others who were to follow after Wells have shared the same ideas; not necessarily because they knew Wells, or read his work, but because they shared the same spirit which lead them to the same conclusions about the world.

Fellow Englishman, John Lennon, who culturally would have little in common with Wells, represents one example of the diversity of character within the progressive movement. Yet, even with substantial differences with Wells, Lennon along with others were revolutionary in and propelling The Open Conspiracy forward, knowingly, or unknowingly.  This is precisely what Wells predicted and hoped for. Lennon put the essence of the movement in the lyrics of his song Imagine:​

             "Imagine there's no countries               It isn't hard to do               Nothing to kill or die for              And no religion too              Imagine all the people              Living life in peace. . .              . . . Imagine all the people              Sharing all the world...              You may say I'm a dreamer              But I'm not the only one              I hope someday you'll join us              And the world will live as one"

The Open Conspiracy is a global spiritual movement speaking a spiritual language, a spirit of anti-Christ. There is not merely one single cabal in a cigar-smoke filled room in Rome, Amsterdam, or Paris secretly scheming to take over the world. There are multitudes of cabals, some competing, some working together in association, in networks, or independently; many of whom are disconnected and have no idea they are a cabal. They are merely doing their jobs, or promoting agendas and ideas they believe in, or just out to make as much money as they can. There are others involved also, commoners who have no personal desire for positions of power, other than to empower others who see the world in such as they themselves would imagine it being. ​

However, it is those who are at the top who are obsessed with power and obsessed with controlling society. They are perfectly aware of what they are doing, and every move is calculated with specific designs. This is not a monolithic movement, but there is one thing which they all share in common: they all are delusional and are deceived into believing in a universal system of international law and government.

What HG Wells, and all others of this persuasion fail to realize is the divisions between men are not lines drawn on the globe by some surveyor, they are divisions drawn by principles and ideologies inside of men, some of which are irreconcilable between them. The only possible way to maintain any freedom or peace at all in the world is to draw lines of division, create boundaries and protect the freedoms and liberties that lie within those borders. You cannot spread freedom by capitulation to tyranny or surrendering sovereignty to international law or opinion. And why would anyone imagine that a united world would necessarily mean it would be a better world? Indeed, for a united world would still forever be a divided world of self interests, a world standing upon feet of clay mingle with iron, which, can only crumble under its own weight bringing all into conflict and ruin.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics; Religion
KEYWORDS: conspiracy; globalist; greatreset; hgwells; newworldorder; progressive

1 posted on 03/24/2021 3:22:15 PM PDT by inpajamas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: inpajamas
Open Conspiracy: Part I

Open Conspiracy: Part II

Open Conspiracy: Part III

2 posted on 03/24/2021 3:34:20 PM PDT by inpajamas ( https://christiansjewsbiblicalnews.com )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: inpajamas

BKMK

Interesting posts and I’m off tomorrow!


3 posted on 03/24/2021 4:16:15 PM PDT by lizma2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: inpajamas
Gonna watch this related video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgronEMt6qo

Also recommend “Pawns in the Game” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hCx1rOmJfk

4 posted on 03/24/2021 6:55:37 PM PDT by conservativeimage (I’d rather die a free spirit than enter into heaven without a soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson