Posted on 03/22/2021 2:31:36 PM PDT by inpajamas
"Blue Print For World Revolution":
From the beginning I realized it too voluminous a work to cite all the evidence contained in H.G. Wells's book 'The Open Conspiracy' which supported a thesis that today we are living the latter stages of it. However, what follows is a sufficient citation of evidence to support that conclusion.
Never before in the history of the world has mankind possessed such great troves of knowledge. And although this vast and ever increasing encyclopedia of knowledge has brought with it immense benefits and manifold hopes, it has also brought along many and great perils. The advent of this astounding collection and consolidation of knowledge, and the possible repercussions, were perceived more than a century ago by such visionaries as Jules Verne and others whose conceptions were expressed through science-fiction novels.
Other pioneers of modern science-fiction soon followed, among whom was H.G. Wells. Although Wells wrote his highly acclaimed novels before the First World War, this catastrophic event had such a profound affect upon Wells, he spent virtually the rest of his life in an effort to change the prevailing mentality of civilization in hopes of saving it. It was Wells's belief that the civilizations of the world would either unite and become one, while continuing to evolve and advance to higher levels of being, or face global annihilation in the future.
Even before the First World War, Wells had already grasped the concept of nuclear energy and the power of an atomic bomb writing in detail about it in his book The World Set Free. In this book, published in 1914, Wells depicts a scenario in which world capitals, major cities, and governments are devastated by nuclear war. The result is total global chaos and anarchy causing a majority of those who survive to come together to form a global socialist society: a world-state. In this newly formed world-order, the nation-state ceases to exist as a sovereign entity. All nations become the subjects of international law and supposedly as a result, war between nations becomes superannuated.
From this point on, all of the world’s forces, powers, and resources, are consolidated and managed by a government of the nations for the benefit and advancement of a cosmopolitan society, albeit, under the authoritarian rule of intellectual elites: "Philosopher Kings". This same theme, in which the world is brought to the brink of total destruction, and is then redeemed by the institution of a one world order, repeats itself throughout many of Wells's writings.
To Wells, this scenario was not science fiction. Realizing the speed at which civilization was modernizing, and perceiving world governments incapable of keeping up with, or controlling technological advancements, it was his belief that the only hope for mankind was in the creation of a "New World Order", and in 1939 he wrote a book by that very title. This book followed another written a decade earlier wherein Wells laid out, not only a concept of a world order, but a plan to facilitate its creation.
The earlier book was entitled "The Open Conspiracy: Blue Prints For A World Revolution". As implied by the title, the book contained a strategy for the convergence of all sympathetic parties into a movement of cultural revolt. The objective of this cultural revolution would be to overthrow traditional moral values and laws, systems, principles, and establishments, with the goal of supplanting them. The book is in effect the blue print for the cultural Marxism we see today. Over time this Marxist movement has radically change world views, giving stage to a new world order. Getting down to the essence of the ideology, it is the overthrow of God’s laws in guiding mankind and supplanting them with high-minded totalitarian ideas.
The Open Conspiracy Today
By understanding Wells's Open Conspiracy, we can begin to comprehend our current society, its cultures and subcultures, their origins and how they have evolved into a somewhat disconnected popular mass movement. Even more importantly, we can know where we stand currently, and as well, comprehend the repercussions and ultimate consequences which will follow as a result of these social changes.
One must keep in mind when reading 'The Open Conspiracy' that although this progressive movement materialized, it did not do so in the name of 'The Open Conspiracy', and most adherents of the movement are completely unfamiliar with the term. Wells himself realized this would be the case, and stated that he was not creating anything, but rather, participating in an existing ideological movement which he hoped to help organize and promote:
“Hundreds of thousands of people everywhere are now thinking upon the lines foreshadowed by my Open Conspiracy, not because they had ever heard of the book or phrase, but because that was the way thought was going.” - HG Wells
Decades ago, Wells forecasted a movement consisting of many diverse entities, which would unite in an organized effort to overthrow traditional values, cultures and laws, to replace them with a modern Progressive worldview. It is a spiritual movement consisting of some who are aware of it, but many more who are not, but joined in the same spirit. It is the spirit of anti-Christ.
What exactly is the Open Conspiracy?
What follows, is the first of a three part installment: The Open Conspiracy for a world revolution, in Wells's own words, [comments in brackets].
1928- Excerpts from The Open Conspiracy in the words of H.G. Wells:
Wells wrote,
“In this book we are not starting something; we are describing and participating in something which has started. It arises naturally and necessarily from the present increase of knowledge” - [Wells is referencing a movement of progressive ideas which are forming and taking hold, especially in intellectual circles during his time. His book is a "blueprint" with which he hopes to unite and organize these forces by defining what the movement must, and must not consist of, its objectives, and means of execution]
Wells: “Fundamentally the Open Conspiracy must be an intellectual rebirth.” - [As Wells expounds upon this, it becomes clear, "rebirth” involves a war against traditions, moral values, religion, and institutions and laws---the old must be razed in order to lay the foundations for birth of a “Great-Reset” of global order]
Wells: “The Open Conspiracy is not to be thought of as a single organization; it is a conception of life out of which efforts, organizations, and new orientations will arise.” - [It is not a conspiracy per se in the traditional sense, because it incorporates a spiritual aspect which connects members who are not necessarily personally connected. It has a spiritual appeal to character types and ideologies. It is a cultural mass movement promoting radical progressive agendas, aggressive by nature, acting openly, and weaving into the fabric of society to take it over: a cultural revolution. Think Globalists, Antifa, BLM, Climate alarmists, etc...]
Wells: ". . . the Open Conspiracy must be heterogeneous in origin. Its initial groupings and associations will be of no uniform pattern.” - [It is a conglomeration organizations, societies, orientations, special interest, NGOs and other divers groups, who, for the same or for different reasons, all share sympathies for, and cooperate together towards the implementation of a socialist society]
Wells: “. . . The League of Nations movement [U.N. predecessor], the Birth Control movement, and most radical and socialist societies, are fields into which Open Conspirators may go to find adherents more than half prepared for their wider outlook. The Open Conspiracy is a fuller and ampler movement into which these incomplete activities must necessarily merge. . .” - [Merge forces, yet, remain separate entities; under one name they are one target, but their political power consists as a movement of innumerable agendas working together as a collective force]
Wells: “. . . The Open Conspiracy itself can never be imprisoned and fixed in the form of an organization. . .” - [It is not a single entity, it is a cultural mass movement driven by progressive philosophies integrated within society through a confederation of education, media, entertainment, pop-culture, and others. It is cultural Marxism]
Wells: “. . . There should be many types of groups. Collective action had better for a time—perhaps for a long time—be undertaken not through the merging of groups but through the formation of ad hoc associations for definitely specialized ends, all making for the new world civilization . . . we must insist that the idea of the Open Conspiracy ever becoming a single organization must be dismissed from the mind. It is a movement, yes, a system of purposes, but its end is a free and living, if unified, world.”
Wells: “It is that there already exist in the world [in 1928] a considerable number of movements in industry, in political life, in social matters, in education, which point in the same direction as the Open Conspiracy and are inspired by the same spirit.” [Wells's recognition of the extent of the socialist infestation already existing at the time.]
Wells: “The Open Conspiracy, the world movement for the super-session or enlargement or fusion of existing political, economic, and social institutions must necessarily, as it grows, draw closer and closer to questions of practical control. It is likely in its growth to incorporate many active public servants and many industrial and financial leaders and directors. It may assimilate great masses of intelligent workers.” - [Politicians and activist judges, in concert with corporations and financial institutions, consolidating and merging power to impose totalitarian rule]
Wells: “While the Open Conspiracy is no more than a discussion [in 1928] it may spread unopposed because it is disregarded. As a mainly passive resistance to militarism it may still be tolerable. But as its knowledge and experience accumulate and its organization become more effective and aggressive, as it begins to lay hands upon education, upon social habits, upon business developments, as it proceeds to take over the organization of the community, it will marshal not only its own forces but its enemies.” - [a forecast of great polarization, a culture war which goes largely disregarded until it seizes power and is irreversible.]
Wells: “…..the movement we contemplate must from the outset be diversified in its traditions and elements and various in its methods. It must fight upon several fronts and with many sorts of equipment. It will have a common spirit, but it is quite conceivable that between many of its contributory factors there may be very wide gaps in understanding and sympathy. It is no sort of simple organization.” - [Wells is describing the embrace of multi-culturalism, diversity, alternative sexual lifestyles, and other agenda driven activists. - These many fragmented and odd groups of diverse types for various reasons come together as "strange-bed-fellows" and collectively create the support base of the radical left.]
Wells: “……it must be necessarily not a class development, but a convergence of many different sorts of people upon a common idea.” - [Not just economic Marxism of class warfare, but also cultural Marxism. All socialist sympathizers are welcome.]
Wells: “Free Trade nationalism in power is better than high tariff nationalism, and pacifist party liberalism better than aggressive party patriotism.”
Wells: “The Open Conspiracy is the natural inheritor of socialist and communist enthusiasms; it may be in control of Moscow before it is in control of New York.”
Wells: “The Open Conspiracy rests upon a disrespect for nationality, and there is no reason why it should tolerate noxious or obstructive governments because they hold their own in this or that patch of human territory.” - [International Supremacy over nations, eg: UN, World Court, deference to international treaties and laws over national sovereignty]
Wells: “All the weight of the Open Conspiracy will be on the side of the world order and against that sort of local independence which holds back its subject people from the citizenship of he world.” - [Effectively, international mob rule of nations over sovereign states]
Wells: “To avoid the positive evils of war and to attain the new levels of prosperity and power that now come into view, an effective world control, not merely of armed force, but of the production and main movements of staple commodities and the drift and expansion of population is required. It is absurd to dream of peace and world-wide progress without that much control.”
Wells: “The Open Conspiracy is a creative, organizing movement and not an anarchistic one. It does not want to destroy existing controls and forms of human association, but either to supersede or amalgamate them into a common world directorate. If constitutions, parliaments, and kings can be dealt with as provisional institutions, trustees for the coming of age of the world commonweal, and in so far as they are conducted in that spirit, the Open Conspiracy makes no attack upon them.” [Treaties of surrender of national sovereignty to the world commonweal; nations exist conditionally as global states in a World Federation where membership or submission is mandatory. It will destroy existing controls and forms of human association if it must.]
Comments
Wells's Open Conspiracy is an envisioned cultural mass movement. This movement would include individuals, groups, organizations, and various other entities within both public and private sectors. Together they unite to establish a socialist system. This is accomplished by means of engaging in a cultural revolution to gradually supplant traditions, values, culture, and laws. The first objective is to promote a socialist worldview which eventually gains enough adherents to gradually become a governing power exerting total control over all individuals and institutions.
Is this not the agenda of the innumerable NGOs and PVOs such as George Soros‘s Open Society, moveon.org, and countless other progressive organizations, as well as major media outlets and the entertainment industry?
Joining in this effort to re-engineer society are mastodonic charitable foundations such as the Ford, Rockefeller, Carnegie, Tides, Open Society, Gates, and other billionaire philanthropist organizations and foundations. These work in conjunction with, the United Nations, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Club of Rome, and other global think tanks and institutions. And, if that is not enough, they also have political power and influence through the UN, a multitude of national politicos, and NGOs whom they support and control. These so called humanitarian groups are all funded by Billionaires and huge international ever merging corporations whose financial interest and loyalties lie within a globalist agenda.
End Part I
https://christiansjewsbiblicalnews.com/open-conspiracy-part-i
Bookmark
Bkmrk
So H. G. Wells was a socialist. Back then socialism was in its infancy and he hadn’t had the benefit of seeing that they always fail miserably. Besides that though he also seems to have overlooked the major problems of placing control in so few hands, and the temptations that power wold bring in the form of corruption. Bright man, but he obviously did not think things trough on a reality level, in all directions imaginable.
Henry Ford was a socialist too, and much to my dismay, he was also anti-Jew. I didn’t know this till recently.
I was raised in Detroit, and even born at the Henry Ford Hospital. He’s still a Hero there.
So if a particular Christian sect was able to successfully preach the Good News to every person on the Earth and have them all repent of their sins and join the one true faith then that would be a good thing.
So globalization is not necessarily the problem. Neither is nationalism necessarily a good thing, especially if a group of people hold out on joining the one true faith just on account of their nationality.
The problem really is that materialistic humanism is not fit for human consumption. It is materialism, which fails to take into account the spiritual nature of man, that is the main problem with most forms of socialism.
There are supposedly Christian forms of socialism, but they tend to be held by progressive Christians who are Christian in name only.
We should oppose globalism, not because it is global, but because nations currently have major disagreements on many issues which can't be papered over by a false communitarianism. Even the EU can't create a union of relatively similar European nations because of major differences on economic and social issues. We should also oppose globalism because of the people who are advocating for it, i.e. materialists.
The normal rejoinder to socialism is capitalism, but capitalism is one of the means by which humans degenerated into atomistic consuming/producing materialists. So saying "Socialism Bad. Free Markets Good," is no real answer. Something like Distributism might be a better fit for material/spiritual beings like us.
According to the bible, where did nationalism come from? It came when the world was globalist and God divided the nations. All people were were of one tongue and they united in rebellion against God. God divided the nations and scattered the people to breakup Satan’s monopoly on power. A hypothetical situation where everyone serves God and we all live in unity will not happen on earth until the wicked are removed. Every attempt at a the consolidation of all people under one power in history has been inspired by a force of evil and in time ended in failure. It didn’t work in Heaven either when the angels were all one under God. Lucifer and his angels rebelled. The reality is that globalism will always be a bad thing as long as the wicked exist.
If you search to see how many US corporations and elitist supported the Nazis it is incredible. Some went through Argentina, which was neutral, during the war to sell to as a broker. They would in turn transfer the goods to Germany; such as Standard Oil of New York. Bayer who sells you aspirin today, was a subsidiary of IG Farbin which made the gas to exterminate Jews. It’s not unlike what is happening today with “woke elitist” corporations. They are traitors.
Even our own English language has undergone major changes since the time of Chaucer; a long time after the Tower of Babel fell.
Even Fanta Soda pop has a ‘tainted’ history.
It was created in Germany in 1940 by the German Coca Cola bottling company. Because of WW2, there was no shipping between Nazi Germany and USA. Therefore, this German bottling plant could no longer get Coca Cola syrup.
The name Fanta comes from the German word Fantastisch, meaning ‘fantastic’.
These details do not effect me in the present, so I simply deal with what is now available to everybody.
Yet another ‘inconvenient’ truth.
The problem that Wells did not see (or, at least, did not write about) is that no matter what set of laws and governance is set up, human nature will remain. Without the idea of God and an overarching, immutable, set of laws set up by Him, human nature will inevitably (and more often, well before one would imagine that “inevitably” would come about) lead to a dictatorship in which a very few would effectively enslave the vast majority of humanity. But for the active cooperation of garbage newspapers like the NY Slimes with the Soviet leadership, the world would have known in the 1930s about just how flawed the ideas and the reality behind Socialism (which is economic) and its twin Communism (which is political) really were and are - and that is because of human nature.
To his credit, Wells was a great sci-fi writer. As a political theorist, he was at best incredibly naive; more likely, he was just another ideological idiot, the likes of which have afflicted Western Civilization for at least several hundred year (and more so now than ever before).
In about 15 min. I am posting part III
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.