Posted on 02/06/2021 8:03:08 PM PST by bitt
We warned on November 2, 2020, the day before the 2020 Election, that the nightmare scenario created by the Democrats starring Sleepy Joe Biden was about to begin. We reported on the ‘Color Revolution’ earlier in the 2020 Presidential campaign – In September Tucker Carlson discussed the ‘color revolution’ and Norm Eisen, ironically Obama’s Ethics Czar, was reportedly behind the resistance and the efforts to remove President Trump from office. Like other Democrat lies, the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) didn’t make health care more affordable and Norm Eisen was not someone who cared about ethics.
Below is a video from Tucker Carlson’s show regarding this topic – at the time we didn’t know much about Norm Eisen:
VIDEO
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
P
^
This was an orchestrated coup with numerous conspirators. Plain and simple.
The Big Steal was BIPARTISAN!
I wish our side was that ruthless.
So this communist is responsible for not one but TWO of the most destructive things to happen in the United States in our lifetimes, if not ever.
Obamacare and the outright theft of an election and possible beginning of a civil war.
It’s hard to be as ruthless as someone who is protecting his crimes.
No you don’t.
When You dance with the Devil, the Devil don’t change. The Devil changes you.
Barak ran the BLM and coordinated many of the attacks on Trump. He is the definition of insurrection.
Obama was never eligible, his usurpation was bipartisan as well.
They are, they teamed up with Democrats to cheat out Trump.
Here’s Norm’s “democracy playbook”
All the lunacy we’ve been seeing from the DNC for the past 2 years is all right here -
BLM and AntiFa
“Bunce and Wolchik outline the “electoral model,” a set of electoral strategies for opposition campaigns against authoritarians.68 To implement the model, pro-democracy political
opposition must practice long-term planning, as well as pay close attention to detail, coordination, and lessons learned from past failures. Perhaps most importantly, pro-democracy
parties must pursue an overarching process through which they form transnational networks
between civil society groups, other opposition groups, local electoral activists, international
organizations, and nations striving to promote democracy”
Removal of winner take all elections to “partial votes” because that helps “democracy coalition groups”
“Of course, coalition formation can be excruciatingly difficult, especially in contexts where illiberal
leaders have engineered or exploited divisions. Voters also face difficulties with this approach,
as strategic voting may point them toward candidates whose views they find unpalatable. As
Jan-Werner Müller argues, one way out of this political dilemma is the use of referenda.72 With
their binary yes-or-no structure and potential to craft pointed questions that reflect unity among
opposition parties, referenda offer an opportunity to citizens to decisively communicate their
aversion to a populist government. While not possible in all contexts, such exercises of direct
democracy could serve as alternatives to coalition formation when the latter is beyond reach. “
To corporate collusion
“Corporations should also avoid providing a veneer of legitimacy to illiberal leaders, and instead
ensure that investment decisions are informed, principled, and sensitive to the country context. For example, Hungary’s Orbán has encouraged the continued investment of the German
car companies such as Audi and Daimler in the country, granting them tax reductions, subsidies, and access to decisionmakers.196 In return, he has used their support to legitimize his
economic policies, which contributes to his continued grip on power. Such companies should,
as Thorsten Benner has argued, disinvest from the Hungarian economy, and demonstrate
their support for the liberal democratic institutions that Orbán is working to dismantle.
Companies can act in support of the elements of democratic systems by engaging in corporate social responsibility (CSR). As defined by the UN Industrial Development Organization,
CSR is “a management concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations and interactions with their stakeholders.”197 The principles of
CSR can help promote transparency, corporate accountability, and sustainable development,
and help businesses keep in mind the long-term democratic health of their society.198 CSR can
include donations, employee volunteering, and pro bono work for civil society organizations.199
Within the framework of CSR, companies can also work to defend established standards and
regulations that can counter democratic backsliding, and can themselves propose their own
policies that promote and protect democratic values, even when the state itself rolls back
such protections.”
Our side = Trump supporters.
I thought you meant Republicans, sorry.
Remember Joe calling Trump supporters, CHUMPS? Well, it appears the blacks who fell in line with this farce are the real CHUMPS,
They are, when they want their guy to win.
In 2000, the Democrats attempted a similar election steal in Florida and were confronted with determined and bellicose GOP operatives that beat in doors and shoved people around, because they wanted their globalist chickenshit in office.
Nobody got shoved around nor did anything get damaged and chickenshit or not, the alternative was worse.
Norm Eisen goes hand in hand with American Oversight’s and CREW’s Melanie Sloan, a former staffer of Biden and Schumer.
Speaking of the crooked Norm Eisen:
Former Obama lawyer admits deceiving Congress
washington examiner ^
Posted on 12/10/2011, 10:09:07 AM by Perdogg
Remember the Gerald Walpin affair? Republican Sen. Charles Grassley does.
Walpin was the inspector general of the Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS), the organization that runs the AmeriCorps service program. In June 2009, Walpin received a call from Norman Eisen, who was then the Special Counsel to the President for Ethics and Government Reform. Eisen told Walpin he had an hour to either resign or be fired.
Eisen’s call appeared to violate the 2008 Inspectors General Reform Act, which is designed to protect inspectors general from political interference. The Act requires the president to give Congress 30 days’ notice, plus an explanation of cause, before firing an inspector general. In Walpin’s case, the White House did neither
(Excerpt) Read more at campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.