Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lockheed Martin’s SR-72 Darkstar: A Mach 6 Bomber?
19FortyFive ^ | 1/28/2021 | Peter Suicu

Posted on 01/29/2021 8:21:14 AM PST by Onthebrink

Much debate remains on whether the Lockheed Martin SR-72, affectionately known as the “Son of the Blackbird,” is actually real. It reportedly could be making an appearance in the upcoming film Top Gun: Maverick, the sequel to the 1986 film Top Gun, starring Tom Cruise.

While there is no doubt that the aircraft may be in the production stage, whether it is ready to take to the skies is the other question. Another question is what its actual role could be in the U.S. military, but more on that in a moment.

(Excerpt) Read more at 19fortyfive.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; History; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: blogpimp; goaway; military; moviesarentreal; spamspamblogsandspam; sr72; technology; usmilitary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 01/29/2021 8:21:14 AM PST by Onthebrink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Onthebrink

2 posted on 01/29/2021 8:23:23 AM PST by Red Badger (TREASON is the REASON for the SLEAZIN'.................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Now that is awesome bird...
Makes it probable that it will be scuttled by our new masters...


3 posted on 01/29/2021 8:25:57 AM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is Joe McCarthy now that we desperately need him sober?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Onthebrink
Been hearing about it for years.
No idea if its real.
With satellites being so powerful these days, do we even need a mach 6 reconnaissance plane these days?
Mind you, there used to be an armed version of the SR 71 as well, no?
4 posted on 01/29/2021 8:26:59 AM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SuperLuminal

China copying is as we speak.....................


5 posted on 01/29/2021 8:28:04 AM PST by Red Badger (TREASON is the REASON for the SLEAZIN'.................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Onthebrink

Great to know that Kamala Harris is now in control of one of the world’s most capable bombers.

When does she attack Phoenix?

Oh Wait...Maricopa County is supposedly Democrat now.

Never mind.


6 posted on 01/29/2021 8:28:07 AM PST by Regulator (It's Fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

“...Mind you, there used to be an armed version of the SR 71 as well, no?....”

I don’t think there ever was an armed version. I think that was a cover story.


7 posted on 01/29/2021 8:30:33 AM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Onthebrink
SR-72 would be Air Force. 'Maverick' is Navy. I doubt he would make a lateral move at this point in his career.

Unless, of course, he was forced to.

This is a bunch of fantasy crap. That thing will never fly, and it wouldn't be a bomber if it did.

8 posted on 01/29/2021 8:32:22 AM PST by real saxophonist (Yeah, well, you know that's just like, uh... your opinion, man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

Recon aircraft are more flexible, are harder for adversaries to predict and counter, and can get better images because they operate closer to targets than satellites.


9 posted on 01/29/2021 8:32:23 AM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“Let’s have some music in here, boiler.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTa2vXL7FI8


10 posted on 01/29/2021 8:32:48 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reily
SR = Strategic Reconnaissance. No reason to be armed when it could outrun anything shot at it.

We have satellites that do that job now. Which is why the SR-72 will never fly, as anything but experimental.

11 posted on 01/29/2021 8:37:29 AM PST by real saxophonist (Yeah, well, you know that's just like, uh... your opinion, man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Onthebrink

Doesn’t the “SR” designation indicate that the aircraft is Reconnaissance?


12 posted on 01/29/2021 8:37:44 AM PST by Little Pig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

China Joe just gave them the plans, may take a while for them to copy.


13 posted on 01/29/2021 8:37:59 AM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizens Are Born Here of Citizen Parents)(Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

OK.
I bow to your superior knowledge on the matter.


14 posted on 01/29/2021 8:39:10 AM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The engines would never be on the bottom.


15 posted on 01/29/2021 8:58:55 AM PST by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist

Original design of the SR-71 was a 1 seater called the A-12. Pilot had to fly the plane and work all the recon gear. It was discovered that made for a way too busy pilot. Redeisigned as a two seater with pilot & recon operator. The original cover story for the A-12 was to be a long range fighter to escort the B-70. I had the model when I was a kid, it’s purpose was the first paragrph in t he model instructions. It was either a guess or a cover story.


16 posted on 01/29/2021 9:01:32 AM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jewbacca

If it’s doing Mach 6, it doesn’t matter where they are...................


17 posted on 01/29/2021 9:04:24 AM PST by Red Badger (TREASON is the REASON for the SLEAZIN'.................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Reily

There were three prototype YF12s built, designed to be interceptors. There were missile test firings, but none of these achieved operational status.


18 posted on 01/29/2021 9:04:51 AM PST by allblues (God is neither a Republican nor a Democrat but Satan is definitely a Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe
Mind you, there used to be an armed version of the SR 71 as well, no?

There was, and it was called the YF-12. It was never put into production.


19 posted on 01/29/2021 9:10:42 AM PST by Yo-Yo (is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Onthebrink

If they’re just starting to talk about it now we’ve had it for at least 10 years.

CC


20 posted on 01/29/2021 9:12:30 AM PST by Celtic Conservative (My cats are more amusing than 200 channels worth of TV.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson