Skip to comments.
Russell Ramsland: "I think there will be huge evidence coming forward in the next couple of days that will drastically change the playing field. The question is will anyone report on it." at minute 6:00 in the video link.
Populist Press/Newsmax ^
| 12-18-2020
| NewsMax
Posted on 12/19/2020 6:57:25 AM PST by PK1991
Russell Ramsland: "I think there will be huge evidence coming forward in the next couple of days that will drastically change the playing field. The question is will anyone report on it." at minute 6:00 in the video link.
Ramsland: The courts aren't going to help us. All the case dismissals are not related to evidence. Not one court has looked at any evidence yet.
Ramsland also talks about his forensic examination of the Antrim county voting machines report.
Ramsland responds to Dominion CEO's denial that the system can flip votes or uses fractional voting. "He needs to go back and look at his own machines and read paragraph 11.0 of his own user manual."
Ramsland: In his report the Michigan Secretary of State after asking that the whole report not be released asked that the computer logs that were part of the report be redacted. The Judge ordered the computer logs redacted form the report. Then after it is released they say there is no evidence in the report.
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 4thegullibles; dominion; election; fraud; freebeertomorrow; ramsdell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-197 last
To: kiryandil
Sure, George Soros has paid me to troll Free Republic for the last 13 years.
To: The Pack Knight
I notice that you pop up and down as the occasion demands.
Nothing to do with George Soros at all...
182
posted on
12/19/2020 8:56:47 PM PST
by
kiryandil
(Chris Wallace: Because someone has to drive the Clown Car)
To: kiryandil
Agreed. M. Scott Peck wrote a book about the type: People of The Lie.
183
posted on
12/19/2020 9:03:45 PM PST
by
MHGinTN
(A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
To: MIDad23
I believe that Marshall Law is Eminem’s real name.Ya got the first name right...
Eminem's real name is Marshall Bruce Mathers III.
The name rolls off the tongue like his initials - "M-and-M".
184
posted on
12/20/2020 4:39:35 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: crz
So; what if Santa DOES deliver us a nice present and Trump DOES get sworn in again on January 20th?
He will DEFINITELY be gone in 2024!!
What we do THEN??
The Libs will STILL run the schools, media, inner cities, 'entertainment'...
...right?
185
posted on
12/20/2020 4:45:05 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: DEPcom
Your point above in bold is why this must go to trial. The American people need to know. Let it be heard!
My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge:
Hosea 4:6 KJV
Where there is no vision, the people perish: but he that keepeth the law, happy is he
Proverbs 29:18
186
posted on
12/20/2020 4:51:17 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: Elsie
Godlessness has been creeping over the land for decades. We are at the saturation level in this country where people’s morals and thinking are so corrupted (think: Rom. 1:18-32) that, apart from widespread repentance in our land, America, as originally constituted will have all but ceased to exist by then.
Repentance is what it will take, and God is in the business of transforming the repentant into a new creature (with the mind of Christ). Apart from that, our country goes the way of Gomorrah.
187
posted on
12/20/2020 4:51:52 AM PST
by
MarDav
To: kiryandil
...while attending (snort!) the Free College and talking on your Free Obama phone!
188
posted on
12/20/2020 4:53:47 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: MHGinTN
I read that; but I saw no ‘proof’ of it; so it goes goes right along with the title of this thread; I guess.
189
posted on
12/20/2020 4:55:54 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: kiryandil
A Michigan secretary of state official tells volunteer recounters to ignore the fact that many ballots have the same signature......and the 'volunteer's didn't stand up on their hind legs and yell; in unison:
WTF????
190
posted on
12/20/2020 4:59:01 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: Senormechanico
191
posted on
12/20/2020 5:02:27 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: evangmlw; Jan_Sobieski; teppe; wita; MAAG
Declare Martial Law and seize the media outlets.That's what Lincoln did.
Similar to what Joseph Smith did earlier...
192
posted on
12/20/2020 5:08:41 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: The Pack Knight
193
posted on
12/20/2020 5:14:37 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: MarDav
194
posted on
12/20/2020 5:16:37 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: Elsie
...and both of them got killed later.
195
posted on
12/20/2020 5:18:31 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: NELSON111
Sidney Powells’ lawsuits are replete with fraud. Her cases are docketed at the Supreme Court.
196
posted on
12/20/2020 10:38:21 AM PST
by
PK1991
( )
To: Fester Chugabrew; crz
So your sworn affidavits is not evidence at all if you submit one in court?
Elsewhere a certain FReeper brought up the technical definition of evidence, namely that it not evidence until it is admitted in a court of law. Most people do not operate with that definition. Understandably so.
I dunno if it was the same guy or not, but someone I was talking to a week or two ago (forget their username, too lazy to search my post history that far back) mentioned the same. He also said that even signed affidavits are NOT evidence, they are considered hearsay. Unless such witness is available and provides a deposition where both parties can cross-examine, then and signed statements are NOT admissible as any kind of evidence.
I thought that was rather odd, but I don't know much into details of actual court methods and processes.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-197 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson