Bkm
so the glaciers are moving back to where they were back then
Only back to 300 AD?
“remains of snowmobiles” ???
What does that Otto guy have to say about that?
Interesting. Would seem to imply that in 300AD there were no glaciers in this area. Must’ve been the result of early manmade global warming from all those Viking fire pits.
Interesting. Would seem to imply that in 300AD there were no glaciers in this area. Must’ve been the result of early manmade global warming from all those Viking fire pits.
They had SUV’s before 300AD??
I understand it’s frightening about things being revealed in the ice now being exposed. But what is equally frightening to me is, what happened that suddenly large portions of the globe were suddenly covered in ice?
PinGGG!........................
They should be happy about global warming! They would never have found these articles with out it! ungrateful
Do I really need the sarcasm tag?
Just because we see glaciers there at this time doesn’t mean that there were glaciers back them.
You can’t use what we see now to then hypothesize it was the same in the past.
It shows that in 300 AD there were no socialists trying to gain control over the means of production.
Think about this for a second. GLACIAL MELT exposed artifacts. Which means at one point in time the glacier WAS EXPOSED!! So why the big deal that the glacier is now at a point it once was a long time ago?
So what is the anomaly? The warm world of the 20th and 21st centuries, or the cold one from which we are emerging.
It appears the ancients enjoyed these ice free passages.
So, the ice patch was already melting in 1974. Wasn’t that about when the earth was globally cooling leading to our collective deaths?
ping for follow up to see if my comment on the website was actually posted
Maybe I’m reading it wrong, if I am then I apologize. 300 A.D. was not the Viking age, that wouldn’t start until almost 500 years later. I question a study that doesn’t have a basic fact like that correct.
bookmark