The WISCONSIN Supreme Court Just Gave Its Legislature Cover To Investigate Illegal Votes

https://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com ^ | 12.15.2020 | LD

[rxsid]

THE WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT JUST GAVE ITS LEGISLATURE COVER TO INVESTIGATE ILLEGAL VOTES

Yesterday, the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled that the election for presidential electors was illegally handled by Wisconsin Election Officials, and the Court indicated that all votes by persons claiming to be “indefinitely confined”, must be determined on a case by case basis:.

“¶40 Accordingly, we conclude that the Respondents’ interpretation of Wisconsin’s election laws is erroneous. Additionally, we conclude that Emergency Order #12 did not render all Wisconsin electors ‘indefinitely confined,’ thereby obviating the requirement of a valid photo identification to obtain an absentee ballot.”

Wisconsin has no statutory process dealing with this rare scenario, while the Wisconsin Legislature has plenary authority to investigate all of the suspect votes. If the Democrat Governor, and/or Executive Branch and local election officials in Wisconsin refuse to comply with the Legislature’s investigative authority, the Legislature may – according to the long held SCOTUS precedent of McPherson v. Blacker – “resume the power at any time” to choose electors.

The Wisconsin Legislature has a very fair and impartial process available to them: those voters who were given false information by Wisconsin Clerks should be able to prove that they are indefinitely confined, according to the strict definition laid out yesterday by the Wisconsin Supreme Court. If they are so confined, their votes should count.

And those voters – who relied upon the illegal information given by Wisconsin Clerks – who were not truly indefinitely confined according to the Supreme Court’s strict definition, should be able to cure their votes by providing valid photo identification as required under Wisconsin law, previously enacted by the Legislature. If those voters fail to comply with the Legislature’s prior enactments, as interpreted by the Wisconsin Supreme Court, then those votes should not be counted by the Legislature.

I will remind the Wisconsin Legislature that you have plenary power, according to Article II, § 1, of the Constitution, to determine the manner of choosing electors. If any State officials deny your power, such usurpation must be met with the threat of using the nuclear option, meaning that you must be ready to appoint electors on your own, if they try to stop you from conducting the free and fair review, which is now necessary, after your Supreme Court has held that State officials conducted an illegal election as to indefinitely confined voters.

Taking action now, after the Wisconsin Supreme Court has given affirmative guidance, cannot, in any sense, be described as putting your fingers on the scale of justice. It’s the opposite. Your Supreme Court has determined that the scale of justice was tampered with by Wisconsin election officials, and it is your sworn duty to correct the illegal instructions and cure the illegal votes cast thereby.

[rxsid]

FWIW.

[glimmerman70]

So they recount or audit those votes. How many need to be taken away or flipped.

[taxcontrol]

Too little, too late.

The only real course of correcting this steal is for one senator and on representative object to the counting of the states electors.

[rxsid]

Perhaps too little too late.

However: "The only real course of correcting this steal is for one senator and on representative object to the counting of the states electors."

That would only trigger the 2 hour debate process.

In order for biden to have EC votes tossed at the fed congress, is for BOTH Senate AND House to agree to reject certain elector votes.

At this point, the Pelosi House will never agree to reject a single biden vote, and with McConnel now having congratulated biden on the "win", the Senate wouldn't either.

There is a zero percent chance the fed congress votes to toss biden votes.

Perhaps various states legislatures can rescind their elector votes, but everything left at this point is the longest of long shots.

[stanne]

?? It’s all pops and whistles from here

[taxcontrol]

My comment was regards to title 3 section 15 which reads in part:

...Upon such reading of any such certificate or paper, the President of the Senate shall call for objections, if any. Every objection shall be made in writing, and shall state clearly and concisely, and without argument, the ground thereof, and shall be signed by at least one Senator and one Member of the House of Representatives before the same shall be received. ...

By law, that is a required step because if there are no objections, then the election is over.

[rxsid]

The republican controlled state legislatures in the disputed states have failed not only their constituents, but have failed our country.

At a minimum, any vote counted after "election day", November 3rd, is an illegal vote and should have been tossed. The unanimous Supreme Court stated as much:

SCOTUS 9-0: Election Day Is One Single Day. Listen to oral argument from Foster v. Love (1997)
https://freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3914566/posts

The republican controlled state legislatures failed to use their Article II, § 1 constitutional authority and as a result, we will all pay a very...very heavy price and it will matter not one bit if you live in the deepest of red states because there is nothing a red state can do to stop it.

[rxsid]

Of course, there can be objections.

Great, get a Senator to object. So what? Since Pelosi' House will never take biden elector votes away, it's all just political theater.

The real chance to stop the steal was with the contested state legislatures. They had the Article II Constitutional authority to send no elector votes (for example) to the feds if they chose, but they failed to use their authority.

[Spirochete]

Go ahead, close that barn door. Never too late to do the right thing.

[OrioleFan]

With all of the election analysis on various channels, I feel like I’m listening to these football and basketball analysts trying to explain the rules of the game while the referees have their heads under the hoods watching the video to see if someone stepped on someone else’s toe and how many seconds to put back on to the clock.

[Keb]

The votes would be counted by Vice-President Pence, as President of the Senate. When there are two sets of electors for a state, he would initially decide which one to count. I think the rule about both houses concurring, would be to overrule his decision. (If someone has more information, please share it.)

For the states which have submitted two electoral packets, if he chooses the one that represents the voters, instead of the one that represents the cheaters, it would take both houses to change those votes to Biden. The House would surely do it. The Senate might jump either way. Much of the Republican establishment hates President Trump, but they would realize that if they go along with the steal, they are saying that the Democrats can now change any votes they want—which would be suicide.