In Michigan, Federal Judge Linda Parker won’t let victims of voter fraud testify in court. Fraudsters used absentee ballots to vote under these people’s names. Why is Judge Parker afraid to let the public hear their testimony?

wordpress ^ | December 7, 2020 | Dan from Squirrel Hill

[grundle]

In Michigan, Federal Judge Linda Parker won’t let victims of voter fraud testify in court. Fraudsters used absentee ballots to vote under these people’s names. Why is Judge Parker afraid to let the public hear their testimony?

In Michigan, Federal Judge Linda Parker has rejected an election lawsuit filed by Matt Braynard.

This video shows some of the claims that Braynard would have made if Judge Parker had allowed the lawsuit to proceed.

Braynard claims that his team spoke with 926 people whose names and address had been used to cast absentee ballots.

He claims that 12.6% of those people said they never requested an absentee ballot.

He plays audio from some of those people.

Why is Judge Parker afraid to let the public hear their testimony?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8ukz9SDIdk

[GreyFriar]

hopefully her decision will be appealed to a higher court

[beethovenfan]

Our government is utterly corrupt. Both parties share the blame. The country cannot survive long with this level of evil. As the old saying goes, “the fish rots from the head”.

[Jyotishi]

“fraudulators(?)”

Fraudomites?

[enumerated]

“Why is Judge Parker afraid to let the public hear their testimony?“

It’s not that they are afraid - they are in on the fix.

Why would local judges in Democrat strongholds be interested in exposing their own crimes?

[BigEdLB]

Judge getting China $

[gov_bean_ counter]

Nope, just getting even.

You know “the community” has been denied equal Justice under the law for so long, now it’s time to turn the tables...

[MortMan]

Was there a rationale from the judge? Or is the pot simply rousing the rabble?

*IF* the judge rejected the lawsuit for valid procedural or legal grounds, then the post is rabble rousing.

If the judge just decided that the public didn’t need to see tha result, then the judge should be removed from the bench.

Can you elucidate?

[MarvinStinson]

Bumblegummer’s act is getting old.

[WellyP]

JUST another OBAMA “JUDGE”

[MarvinStinson]

Nominated by Barack Obama

[TigerLikesRoosterNew]

She is a malevolent zealot.

[beef]

If my vote was stolen, I would file a police report. Every one of these people should file a police report.

[TheConservativeTejano]

Because the judge is as corrupt as the fraudsters (fraudulators(?)).

Partner, the state of Michigan overwhelmingly voted for President Trump instead of that Crazy Fraudster Joe Biden.

The States of Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Nevada and Arizona all voted for President Trump.

The DemonRat party will lose big time.

We already know that Journalism is dead in this country.

We are getting too close to CW2.

[antidemoncrat]

The Democrats have so overwhelmed the election system with fraud there was no way Biden was going to lose. That is probably why he didn’t need to campaign.

[Soul of the South]

“Nominated by Barack Obama”

Confirmed by a bipartisan majority in the Senate. She did receive GOP votes. Vote was 60-37. Three did not vote, including Marco Rubio.

[joshua c]

That was pretty mild actually. Maybe he is in a good mood tonite.

[Impy]

What we should be posting is her address.

[fieldmarshaldj]

Silly foo. Only Republicans are allowed to be doxxed.

[ought-six]

Ah, another Obama appointee; and a rabid leftist black woman, to boot.

[DOC44]

This is the quickest way to bring about a lawless society. If there is no justice applied to those committing crimes and victims are silenced from testifying, at that point law abiding citizens will administer justice themselves... evolving into a lawless society.... you know like out there in Portland, Chicago, New York City and Seattle. Get prepared ... it looks like it is coming.