Posted on 12/07/2020 10:22:00 AM PST by grundle
The Gateway Pundit wrote:
“In Georgia President Trump was up by as much as a 57% to Biden’s 42% and with 50% of the votes counted Trump was still way ahead. Then Biden was allocated batches of votes for hours, some with negative Trump votes and then with 89% of the votes in, Biden took the lead. From that point on for the next 53 batches of votes counted, for EVERY SINGLE vote batch the batches had exactly a 50.05% to 49.95% victory margin for Biden and Trump cementing Biden’s lead.”
Their claim about the ratio being the exact same for 53 consecutive batches is something that can be checked to see if it’s true of false.
If it is true, then it’s definite proof of fraud.
This video, which is also from the Gateway Pundit, says that similar things also happened in Michigan, Virginia, and Pennsylvania:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_P3-Z2MV5I
And again, if these claims are true, then they are also definite proof of fraud.
Therefore, I’m asking the Washington Post to investigate these claims, to see if they are true or false.
If the Post checks it out and finds it to be fraud, they simply won’t report it.
Every MSM news organization is repeating “no evidence of fraud” through the echo chamber. We listen to Conservative Talk Shows, the news comes on and says the opposite of what we just listened to. Who do we believe? The MSM news has been wrong a big percentage of the time.
Guy With Blog Demands Investigation of Claims Made by Other Guy With Blog
This was on war room about two weeks ago.
Dan, the author, doesn’t understand there is no incentive for WaPo to do anything for Dan...
Kinda funny to watch.
“Conservativemind throws down the gauntlet to MSNBC to back up its assertions that Biden won!”
Yeah, I didn't think so. Dan is the old man yelling at a cloud.
Nobody ever asks the “no fraud, no proof” crowd just what might constitute proof in their minds. They won’t accept the sworn statements of over 800 affiants.... so if an election worker said “yes, I committed fraud and I did it in this way...”, that obviously would not do it. They don’t think Barr is an honest attorney general, so even if he asserted that some workers had committed fraud, that wouldn’t do it. They cannot Define what circumstances would lead them to conclude that any fraud was committed. It is the perfect liberal conundrum.
But they were spot-on in predicting the 2016 election. Oh, wait ...
Why ask the Washington Post, as if they’re some kind of model for neutrality?
Seems like everyone is in a hurry to certify. Hurry, Hurry, the heck with what everyone with a brain seems to see. What a cover-up. They steal the election and next they will steal Christmas.
“I’m publicly asking the Washington Post to investigate the Gateway Pundit’s claim that Georgia had 53 consecutive batches”
The Gateway Pundit needs to give the evidence behind the claim. The “Gateway Pundit” is not important. The “evidence” is what will carry the day.
Get over yourself.
You’re just some wanker with a cheesy blog.
(I know...its not you asking!)
It’s prima facie evidence, not definitive proof.
Judges and lawyers know the difference.
The claim —all else aside—seems to claim 1/2 of 1 percent was diverted, which equals 1/2 of 1 vote per thousand. Two thousand votes to switch 1 full vote . Cheating aside, its insignificant.
Do I understand this properly ?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.