Skip to comments.
DeKalb County, Georgia is illegally refusing to honor an Open Records Request to show the documents for the chain of custody for the absentee ballots that were submitted in drop boxes. I’m going to interpret this as proof that they cheated.
wordpress ^
| December 5, 2020
| Dan from Squirrel Hill
Posted on 12/05/2020 7:20:07 AM PST by grundle
DeKalb County, Georgia is illegally refusing to honor an Open Records Request to show the documents for the chain of custody for the absentee ballots that were submitted in drop boxes. I’m going to interpret this as proof that they cheated.
Well here we’ve got a really good one. In Georgia, there’s an Open Records Request law that requires showing the forms that keep track of the chain of custody for ballot drop boxes.
DeKalb County is refusing to show these documents.
I’m going to interpret this as proof that they cheated.
Why else would they hide the documents?
This is why Democrats love drop boxes. Anyone can put any number of ballots into them. The boxes aren’t supervised. It’s a great way to commit fraud.
TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: electionfraud; stopthesteal; voterfraud
1
posted on
12/05/2020 7:20:07 AM PST
by
grundle
To: grundle
It isn’t proof, but it’s certainly very suspicious.
Did they give a reason for refusing the request?
2
posted on
12/05/2020 7:25:29 AM PST
by
SaxxonWoods
(Ghislaine Maxwell lives and Joe Biden is losing.)
To: grundle
Part of The Steal is to run out the clock, to use every delaying tactic imaginable to gum up the works - to use our very legal system as a means of ensuring its own destruction.
I find myself understanding the complete animosity that Americans felt in 1860-61 toward the other side, more and more each day. This IS a conspiracy to destroy our nation that was plotted and mapped out for at least the last 2-3 years, and I am quickly coming to the conclusion that this is going to result in a great deal of violence before the year is out. 2020 has been such a complete schiff show, and it is becoming more clear everyday that most of what we’ve gone through was planned out very carefully and deliberately.
3
posted on
12/05/2020 7:27:41 AM PST
by
Ancesthntr
("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. )
To: grundle
Common silly, there aint no chain of custody documents for fraud boxes....
Democrats never take 1 for the team. They take 1 from the team....
4
posted on
12/05/2020 7:28:13 AM PST
by
jmclemore
(Hey! Mr. President, Lock them the FugUp)
To: grundle
of course the request is being refused..because the records do not exist!!
5
posted on
12/05/2020 7:28:23 AM PST
by
SGCOS
To: grundle
6
posted on
12/05/2020 7:37:20 AM PST
by
rainee
(Release the Kraken!)
To: Ancesthntr
Yep. Delay and count on the cowardice of the GOP legislatures in the states.
7
posted on
12/05/2020 7:48:20 AM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(If the meanings in the Constitution can change, why did they bother writing it down?)
To: SGCOS
8
posted on
12/05/2020 7:49:36 AM PST
by
BrexitBen
To: grundle
There is so much evidence that the democrats cheated that there is no question anymore. Some left-leaning judges and democratic governors in the five questionable states can deny hearings on the issue but the populace now knows for sure that they cheated. Biden and Harris will be viewed as illegal heads of state for 4 years and will insure a Republican win in 2024.
To: SaxxonWoods
Did they give a reason for refusing the request?
Yes, they haven’t finished fabricating them yet.
10
posted on
12/05/2020 7:51:38 AM PST
by
doragsda
To: Ancesthntr
Part of The Steal is to run out the clock, to use every delaying tactic imaginable to gum up the works
The “clock” is somewhat imaginary. while there are dates out there, they can be extended by court order. If a new president isn’t decided by January 20, then Pelosi becomes prez for the interim until it is decided. While this isn’t a dream scenario, I’d rather have Pelosi for president for two months than have Biden for 4 years.
11
posted on
12/05/2020 7:53:48 AM PST
by
doragsda
To: grundle
Truly, the devil did go down to Georgia. Must have been in the form of huge cash transfers from China and Soros.
The question is did they sell their souls for petty cash, or was it for a substantial sum?
Line from A Man for all Seasons: “Why Richard, it profits a man nothing to give his soul for the whole world...but for Wales.”
Substitute their paltry amount for Wales.
12
posted on
12/05/2020 8:07:31 AM PST
by
odawg
To: doragsda
While I agree with you that the specific dates everyone speaks of (December 14 and January 6) as carved in stone are NOT, in fact, carved in stone (they are just federal law, and the Constitution trumps it every time), they are perceived as such and their approach will cause (or give an excuse for) many supposedly on our side to simply give up and allow the electoral coup to succeed.
13
posted on
12/05/2020 8:18:52 AM PST
by
Ancesthntr
("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. )
To: SaxxonWoods
Very suspicious? Irrelevant.
It’s a lawful request that compels them to honor it! They have not choice. The law serves the people... NOT THEM! Hand it over! There is no other reason to refuse the request but to hide direct/complicit/incriminating evidence of FRAUD. They refuse to allow access to the rabbit hole... guilt in a hundred ways is the ONLY reasoning behind their refusal.
This is NOT A GAME. But the Dems think it is.
14
posted on
12/05/2020 8:28:52 AM PST
by
Bellagio
To: grundle
By definition, there can’t be ANY proof of the chain of custody, since anyone could have placed the ballots in the drop box.
The drop box scheme is also part of the originally hidden and still illegal agreement made by phony Secretary of State Rattensburger and Stacy Abrams.
15
posted on
12/05/2020 8:35:12 AM PST
by
Golden Eagle
(Born Free, as free as the wind blows..... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jg9558phUwg)
To: doragsda
If there’s an upside she has to resign as speaker and would have to run in a special election to get her seat back. I’m not sure anymore if we did special elections in California for vacated seats.
16
posted on
12/05/2020 8:40:17 AM PST
by
newzjunkey
(Purdue in GA for the Senate - Vote Giant Meteor in 2020)
To: maxwellsmart_agent
There is so much evidence that the democrats cheated that there is no question anymore. Some left-leaning judges and democratic governors in the five questionable states can deny hearings on the issue but the populace now knows for sure that they cheated. Biden and Harris will be viewed as illegal heads of state for 4 years and will insure a Republican win in 2024. As if there will be an honest election ever again.
Maybe Xi won't even bother with elections anymore.
He'll have a hundred million emigrants here by then.
17
posted on
12/05/2020 9:13:29 AM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(You are in far more danger from an authoritarian government than you are from a seasonal virus.)
To: Bellagio
No... Safe harbor(an element of FEDERAL statute)is to shield the EC votes from allowing additional challenges to be introduced that HAVE NOT ALREADY had a legal remedy applied. That includes assertions, challenges, claims etc... where no such court filings have been made or litigation initiated that has yet to be acted upon.
Remand back to the court for rules on a Federal statute that is subjugated UNDER the supreme law of the Constitution where no such such stopping points(deadlines mandated) are found was a blatant judicial overstep.
Article II Clause 4:
The Congress may determine the Time of chusing [sic] the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States.
The constitution has no remedy(is silent) for missing a Federal statutory mandated deadline because the constitution does not subvert itself under US Statute... nor is a the 72 year old Federal statute that describes December 8 and 14th deadlines for EC delegates, meeting of delegates, tallying of their votes, have ANY constitutional basis whatsoever!
It is the states responsibility to remedy the failure to appoint delegates as per federal statute.
3 USC §2. Failure to make choice on prescribed day
Whenever any State has held an election for the purpose of choosing electors, and has failed to make a choice on the day prescribed by law, the electors may be appointed on a subsequent day in such a manner as the legislature of such State may direct.
So where is the URGENCY to beat a deadline?
The constitution only allows for a federal Statute that will determine a date and be uniform throughout the several states for when the EC delegate votes are cast, transmission to the US House and then when the joint session of congress shall count the votes to declare a POTUS elect. Inauguration day is also set by federal statute! There is no constitutional deadline!
The constitution mandates ONLY rules/process, not dates.
The 2000 SCOTUS was WRONG. Their is no constitutional deadline... only a Federal statutory stop date for allowing submission. A state misses it, then the EC Delegates that didn't make the transmittal date to the US House by Federal statutory deadline are simply not included. But they can still submit before Jan 6 (another Federal statutory date) for the joint session counting of 'Ascertainment Certificates.'
18
posted on
12/05/2020 9:52:51 AM PST
by
Bellagio
To: BrexitBen
Paging William Barr !
..................................
He’s unable to respond at this time because his forked tongue is stuck in his bagpipe!
19
posted on
12/05/2020 10:03:31 AM PST
by
fortes fortuna juvat
(Hate becomes a virtue when the threat is existential.)
To: grundle
Laws can only be applied to Republicans and not Democrats. How else can you explain so much that has happened in the past couple of decades.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson