Posted on 11/27/2020 9:26:11 PM PST by bitt
Yes... Sorry Biden/Harris/Marxists, you thought Trump would accept the fraud, but he has a spine... Thank you PDJT!! We love you..!!
This is very interesting.
I have read the original Nov 9 complaint by the Trump Team
https://cdn.donaldjtrump.com/public-files/press_assets/2020-11-09-complaint-as-filed.pdf
In the Nov 9 Trump Team complaint, they argue that the PA Secretary of State overstepped her bounds by illegally violating ACT 77 in the guidance given for the 2020 election.
Now, these new complaints argue that ACT 77 is unconstitutional because the Legislature violated the PA Constitution when they enacted ACT 77 in 2019.
Bravo to the lawyers who are digging into the procedural violations.
:) And there you go.
The Nov 9 Trump Team Complaint focused on procedural issues. Namely, their complaint pointed out the times that the PA Secretary of State issued guidelines for the Nov 2020 election that were contrary to the Act 77 law passed in 2019.
It is much easier to prove procedural violations that would invalidate an election than to prove fraud. How many people could you find who would admit to committing a crime?
Now, this latest complaint argued that the Act 77 law is unconstitutional.
Hope this helps.
From your link to Legal Insurrection:
“”””The Judge expressed grave concern as to what a remedy would be if she were to rule the mail-in balloting unconstitutional,””””
I would think the remedy is this:
PA Legislature becomes the party to determine whether Trump or Biden electors go to the Electoral College.
PA does a revote on all other offices.
I would suggest you post the Legal Insurrection articles.
“””Exactly wrong. The whole point of the 3rd circuit ruling is that the acts of the legislature DON’T MATTER... if those charged with following and enforcing the laws they pass refuse to be limited by the laws.
The 3rd circuit ruled that elections don’t have to be conducted according to the law... that following the law is optional... and that an unlawful election is not unfair.
Can’t wait to see what Clarence Thomas has to say about that.”””
You are exactly right. And I am of the mind that the 3rd Circuit Opinion saying that following the law is optional was done of purpose so the case could go immediately to the US Supreme Court.
And I also am of the mind that Clarence Thomas has vivid memories of the past and would like nothing better than to join with his 4 other conservatives at SCOTUS and put Biden’s head on a pike for what Biden did to him in 1991.
Evidently PA congress gave up their power to choose electors via legislation. However they can’t usurp the constitution via anything but an amendment any more than the SOS/BOE/Governor can usurp them by changing how people vote.
PA is just a mess.
Yes. Certified for Biden. Heard on news Fri 11/27/20. WOC1420AM.
“””There are three separate arguments made or to be made in Pennsylvania now...
One, ruled on by the 3rd circuit... claimed that the election was not lawful because it was not conducted according to the law.
Two, this one, saying that the part of the law that was followed was not Constitutional.
Three, even if yet to be filed... IT WAS A PROVABLE FRAUD.
Team Trump won on the first two already... the first even by having the 3rd circuit ruling deliver an absurdity as red meat for the SCOTUS... claiming that an election conducted in an unlawful manner was not unfair.
You think they won’t prove it was fraud in Pennsylvania ?”””
You obviously have read the complaints and the opinions and that is why you have such a clear understanding of what has happened and what has not happened.
I too have read the complaints and opinions and I totally agree with what you wrote.
I do encourage FReepers to take the time to read these legal documents. Here are links to the Nov 9 Trump Complaint and the Nov 27 3rd Circuit Opinion.
https://cdn.donaldjtrump.com/public-files/press_assets/2020-11-09-complaint-as-filed.pdf
Thanks for posting them. Good references.
The legislature doesn’t even require her help in doing that. There is so much going on right now: supposedly the legislature taking its own action on Monday, this ruling, and the Trump team reportedly looking to move up to the USSC.
“This reads like all the PA mail in ballots are going to be thrown out. This applies to other states in the US Constitution the state legislatures didn’t vote for.”
I think it will only be the new ones in non-compliance with the law. Thus the mailed out vs returned. Most of the new ones are Dem.
I use milk in my cereal - seems some here prefer to piss on theirs.
>>> I use milk in my cereal - seems some here prefer to piss on theirs.
I like to start with coffee, so I can wake up and understand what i’m reading.
Few, but there's no honor among Democrats. They'd turn in their best friend for a free soy latte.
“I like to start with coffee, so I can wake up and understand what i’m reading.”
It isn’t working - the verbiage was clear
>>> the verbiage was clear
Your objection is not.
You claimed the author misunderstood the judge who said it looked like the Trump campaign had a winning argument - was likely to succeed.
You also said the judge couldn’t give the legislature power it already didn’t have, but the judge didn’t try to do that.
“””They’d turn in their best friend for a free soy latte.”””
Maybe we all need to donate some money to Crime Stoppers so that organization can increase the reward they will pay a person who gives them a tip about someone who fraudulently voted.
Reminds me of a scene from the opening of “A Bridge Too Far”..
Dutch Kid: “Dad... what’s that sound?”
Dutch Dad: “Panic...”
Watch for the democrats to do something drastic and nasty now.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.