Posted on 11/22/2020 6:45:33 PM PST by conservative98
This is all about election official fraud.
They changed the rules against the laws established by the state legislatures.
That is illegal and unconstitutional.— Jenna Ellis (@JennaEllisEsq) November 21, 2020
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
Jenna was the most well spoken of the bunch at the press conference last week! Had her head together and was unshaken by the press aholes.
This is the best route to take, Federal law was violated.
> This is the best route to take, Federal law was violated.
It is also the most likely to bear fruit within the time constraints.
Sidney should absolutely pursue the Dominion angle if she has the goods, but it’s probably going to take months/years to unravel that mess.
RE: enna Ellis: This is about election official fraud
But HOW MASSIVE IS THE FRAUD? Enough to overturn the real results of the election?
The thing abut Jenna and Rudy is they believe that there indeed was fraud but they are NOT WILLING to accept the ENORMITY of it and its implications for the entire government of the USA.
That is what they now distance themselves from their former team mate, Sidney Powell.
Sidney Powell’s accusations are EXTRAORDINARY ( an understatement ) and perhaps Rudy and Jenna can’t seem to fathom and believe the enormity of it all, preferring to consider only mail-in voting fraud.
Consider what Sidney Powell is saying:
* She accuses Dominion of perpetrating a massive election fraud with their software, in effect, stealing the election from the legitimate winner — Donald Trump.
* She says that the cheating software was developed in Venezuela precisely to cheat on elections in Latin America and was used in our country
* She says that Trump actually won 80 million votes ( that’s 8 million more than he actually won ), and Biden stole those votes from Trump.
* She accuses government at the top level of being involved in this massive cheating, implicating the CIA and demanding that their director Gina Haspell be fired.
* She accuses governors ( specifically the governor of Georgia and the Secretary of State ) of accepting kickbacks in order for Dominion to be used as the tabulating system in various states.
* She implies that there was a server related to the cheating of our election in Germany and that it was seized by “the good guys” ( whoever they are ).
* She says that election data are routed overseas — to Barcelona, Germany, etc. for manipulation. This implies that foreign actors are involved.
I have to stop here because the accusations she levels are MIND BOGGLING.
And to top that, she claims that she has evidence to prove them all !!
Extraordinary accusations require extraordinary evidence.
OK then. Instead of Fraud, Fraud, Fraud... it is legal votes vs non-legal votes. Got it.
That is exactly the lawsuit L Lin Wood filed in GA on 11/13
(Different than the TRO)
Sidney’s findings may take too long to pursue to make the Dec.14 deadline. They are still very important.
It would also need cooperation with federal law enforcement, which Bill Barr is not going to do.
‘And to top that, she claims that she has evidence to prove them all !!’
The proof had to come from Trump right...? If kraken is real, how does she have access?
But will it invalidate enough votes to make a difference?
“They changed the rules against the laws established by the state legislatures.”
Which I stated as the issue that the PA court case was erroneously decided. This should be about state law being unlawfully changed, which leads to unequal law application.
The 2000 SCOTUS decision should be supportive, not primary, IMHO.
This may be the best way to give Sydney the room to go against the Gov and other REpubs.
Requires extraordinary property & personal protection.
10 million votes stolen from Trump is massive enough for me.
Biden WAY OVERPERFORMED in just 8 cities, all controlled by crooked democrats. Biden underperformed Hillary every where else (compared to Hillary-2016). That is massive enough for me.
Truck loads of machine printed ballots with perfectly filled circles were trucked in and accepted as valid by not allowing republican observers to observe in early hours of Nov 4th. That is massive enough for me.
Thousands of ballots from certain precincts arrived 99% for Biden. That is massive enough fraud for me.
RE: Sidney’s findings may take too long to pursue to make the Dec.14 deadline. They are still very important.
Yes I agree. It’s not as if we have all the time in the world to look at the evidence ( Powell says that they are coming out like water out of a hose ).
The entire Powell fraud suit will take MONTHS or YEARS to litigate in court and will go past the December 14 deadline when the electors have to convene. I think Trump’s team is aware of the deadline, that’s why they cut Powell loose to pursue the matter separately.
But by then, who knows? Biden will have been elected and if we don’t have a Congress that is under Republican control ( and even then, will these Republicans have the cojones? ), there won’t be an official investigation.
The Lying News that says “Where is the evidence?”. . . .
Just what would be an evidence they would accept?
A video of Joe voting twice?
A dominion machine that spits out Joe ballots like a full-auto Uzi?
A big pile of all the ballots from, say, PA, matched to each registered voter, with an affidavit from each voter affirming their ballot?
I have to get real stupid to imagine what they want, that is not there in front of us all.
Get your head out of own xxxx and read post #15.
As you undoubtedly know, that was more of a clarification than a "distancing." I’ve seen many news reports calling Powell “The President’s attorney,” etc., when she is in private practice and not associated with the Administration in an official capacity.
So many things have to be clarified for the Junior High students who presently comprise the "press corps."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.