Posted on 11/20/2020 6:30:22 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
Great post—thanks.
It might be helpful to identify which states (or part of states) used this hardware/software.
In my state (CT) it was not used, for example.
This would show the perfect pre-printed circles, Biden only votes and fake watermarks that were in one of the affidavits.
I’ve wondered lately if there is any way to find out if my vote was recorded AS CAST.
I live in a state where it probably doesn’t matter, and I voted in person on a machine, and then fed the slip the machine churned out into another machine, to be ‘counted’.
I wasn’t given any record of my vote; and can’t remember if it had a number, or anything besides my votes for Trump-Pence, and a couple of down-ballot things.
I’ve read that people can find out if their mail-in or absentee ballots were actually received; but nothing indicating whether there is any way to find out if one’s vote was recorded properly.
.
I have a feeling this is dwarfed by the fraudulent mail in votes. Methinks lots of people voted early and often.
One of Trump's attorneys (I think) correctly asserted that this was a top to bottom steal. In other words, yes the voting machines themselves were manipulated. But the back end processing aggregators were also employed (e.g. Dominion Canada, Scytl Barcelona).
All methods were used, in order to obfuscate and cover the fraud. Throughout the election system.
However there was also a central locus to monitor results, so that fine-tuning could be done to ensure the proper outcome.
I'm most curious about that particular criminal conspiracy.
We are probably talking over a million fraudulent machine votes and well over a million fraudulent mail in votes.
Then there is probably another million or so of vote harvesting and blatant ballot box stuffing (dead people, out of state people, duplicate votes, etc).
The Democrats went “all of the above” on voter fraud this year!
Correct, my state does provide online confirmation that absentee ballots have been properly received and accepted.
if this is true and the machine reads the digital images, then the sharpies given to latina women in Arizona should not matter.
first I would make sure a count of the paper ballots matched the number of digital ballots
then, I would want a code review to make sure it did not instantly photoshop a % of ballots according to the algo.
one could print out all of the snapshots and do a hand count of those, and compare it to the original paper ballots.
(first I would look at the image sizes because if the image was shopped it might be a different size than the non modified ones, if the programmers did not think of this)
but if the hand count agrees with the machine count in the first place then it is probably not where the fraud occurred
Oopsie! They were accidentally erased just a couple of hours ago. Sorry!
Several of us have been asking for this since the day after the election even prior to all of the machine hacking allegations.
It would seem that there SHOULD be a physical ballot for each vote tallied and a count would show evidence to corroborate the claims of Sidney and others that the machines changed the vote. It would also corroborate claims that poll workers scanned Biden ballots multiple times and did not scan Trump ballots.
I would bet my first born male child that the Minnesota race for president was corrupt as well. We already know that a number of politicians in Minnesota have been cheating for years and the justice department has done nothing. The rebellion against the police budget cutbacks was offset by ballot stuffing and voting violations. With Keith Ellison as attorney general the left will never lose a major office again in the State.
But what if 139,000 ballots with Joe were fed in?
That would be perfectly OK.
Biden boasted in a video about having the most extensive Voter Fraud program ever. Of course, the MSM took it as a gaffe. The said he really meant “Voter Outreach”. Yeah, sure. That’s quite the gaffe. Like telling my wife I want to divorce her when I really mean I love her. Who makes a mistake like that?
It is just common sense that the audit trail of every ballot should be kept for a _long_ time.
Given modern data storage capacity, I would think historians would want it preserved in perpetuity.
It would be cool to look at a twenty year old state rep race to see if there were voter fraud (long after passions had cooled).
Right now the system seems rigged to maximize the opportunity for fraud.
A.I. Systems could easily auto Photoshop images like that, but they would also be very visible in the source code for the device.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.