Posted on 11/16/2020 5:46:14 PM PST by magna carta
Full explanation of Trump's Executive order dealing with election interference.
Bump
Solid, perhaps, except that an educated person could read it in a fraction of the time required to hear it recited. And do a digital search on any sections one may wish to read again.
Is it narcissism that makes people record what they could type in?
Sick of it.
Same video here:
Breaking: Trump’s Declaration of a National Emergency November 14, 2020
https://www.bitchute.com/video/E0bbjang1qx8/
-
Human rights attorney Leigh Dundas:
Breaking: What Trump’s Declaration of a National Emergency to deal with the threat of interference in US Elections - when weighed against his attorneys’ statements in the last 48 hours - actually means.
Trump’s 2018 Executive order (still in effect)
Executive Order on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election
Foreign Policy Issued on: September 12, 2018
Aces! Bookmark
BOOM!
This video is excellent, and only 10.5 minutes.
Please watch!
Details from Distributed News:
within 45 days takes us to when?
Obama got his “17 agencies” to sign off on Russia interference within 6 weeks following the election, I believe.
According to this EO, Trump will receive a report from State, Treasury, DNI, and others. I am not sure if the FBI or CIA is involved, which would be a good thing.
Actually Obama failed to get all 17 or even most.
Agreed—any Freeper who wants to intelligently opine on the President’s legal strategy needs to have spent these ten minutes _first_.
The key thing is that the forty five days expires _before_ Congress will rule on the electors.
So, that means that Congress (one state, one vote, per the Twelfth Amendment) will have access to _all_ the facts before they cast their votes on electors.
Leigh Dundas, the Scientologist?
PFL
She indicated that the Executive Order will support the seizing of all domestic assets of any corporation that engaged in supporting the fraudulent results by propaganda.
ATT (given their conflict of interest with cross ownership with Dominion and their ownership of CNN) would be one obvious target).
This Executive Order is real.
Ad hominem attacks on Leigh are below the belt.
I don’t know anything about her religion.
I’d rather hear about it from someone not devoted to an entirely made-up ‘religion’.
But maybe that’s just me...
Ad hominem is a common fallacy.
If you have a specific factual objection to any point she made, then state it.
Otherwise, your comment is just hitting below the belt.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.