Posted on 11/15/2020 4:15:57 PM PST by Bigtigermike
I've retrieved all of The New York Times' 2020 presidential datasets, which have a time-series of voting data from a company called Edison Research. Here, for instance, is Michigan's.
Below is a graph depicting the shifts in votes in Michigan starting on election day. The X-axis is the date/time and the Y-axis represents the change in votes (positive values denote shifts for Trump, negative values represent shifts for Biden, in hundreds).
May I call your attention to the differences between the left and the right sides of the graph?
Please note that at about 6:30AM ET, a massive vote dump arrived for Biden, magically bringing Trump's huge lead to almost nil
But you need to see the data. Below is a spreadsheet with the time-series.
You'll notice that after the massive 6:30am vote dump (141258 Biden votes to 5968 Trump votes), nearly all swings in the counts came in multiples of around 5,500 at a time to benefit Biden. So of this late vote dump representing nearly 150,000 votes, Biden "received" a statistically impossible 96 percent.
There was also an earlier (11/4/2020 8:50:00Z) dump of around 60,000 votes that went 92 percent for Biden, as well as a later (11/5/2020 13:34Z) one that was 99 percent.
It appears to me like bundles of around 5,500 votes were used to overcome any Trump lead. The correlation is uncanny.
I'll have more info from other states --- that show similar bizarre trends -- shortly.
In the mean time, your thoughts are appreciated.
(Excerpt) Read more at directorblue.blogspot.com ...
Currently there is a whitewash hand count going on in GA (may be over by now, I don’t know).
Would be interesting to see if the same tranche patterns hold up there in the post election data when his lead there was also obliterated.
Would be nice to know if these were hard ballots or just scaled counts. Seems if they are so one sided for Biden, it would be hard ballots. In which case, fraud could be established by getting possession of them and start real forensics on the paper including fingerprints.
This doesn’t seem Intel agency quality, they wouldn’t be so stupid. This ham handed crap seems like Rat goons just doing it in our faces, thinking no one will ever be able to prove it.
We’ll see.
Well I sent it to Powell on Parler
Gee, who could have seen that coming? Certainly not Barr and the rest of the US Dept. of Democrats.
that link is not secure
Just saying.
So now Powell is the one savior. LMAO! Sessions, Huber, Muller, Barr, Duram would save us. We are a Turd nation. My posting like this - which I very rarly do because it is a waist of time. The cancer is terminal. Follow the dots. Trump was our last hope of democracy. If gone now or in 4 yrs the same result will occur. By the time the good people - 74 million voters, who have sat on the butts for decades allowing the cancer to spread is now engulfed in all institutions - all the way to the SC. They are not going to side with Trump. End of story. End of a once great nation.
It appears to me like bundles of around 5,500 votes were used to overcome any Trump lead.
One box of fake ballots at time. This looks like old fashioned ballot box stuffing to me.
I hope you are right as I am hoping for it, this crap needs to stop some times.
Shit’s About To Hit The Fan
White liberal 'elites' cry about black voter suppression- then steal the value of the black communities vote.
Thank you.
A vote counted after election day doesn’t count!
I've retrieved all of The New York Times' 2020 presidential datasets, which have a time-series of voting data from a company called Edison Research.
How can I obtain similar data for each State (and maybe for previous years too)?
ML/NJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.