Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Warning on Georgia: Put all four of these anomalies together, and “the result is a seemingly impossible statistical perfect storm.”
Powerline Blog ^ | 11/10/2020 | Paul Mirengoff

Posted on 11/10/2020 9:01:41 PM PST by SeekAndFind

A warning on Georgia

In this column, Steve Cortes identified four statistical anomalies associated with last week’s presidential vote. Any one of them, he argued, “would cast intense doubt upon election results.” Put all four together, and “the result is a seemingly impossible statistical perfect storm.”

Considering the importance of the Georgia runoff elections, I was struck by this passage in Cortes’ article:

In the Peach State, President Trump’s vote total almost exactly tracked the vote totals for the Republican senate candidates, separated by merely 818 votes out of 2.43 million votes Trump earned there. But, Joe Biden saw an astounding surplus of 95,801 votes over the Democratic Senate candidates.

Something, Cortes concluded, was likely amiss.

I’m betting that in the Georgia runoffs, most of those 95,801 votes will be “transferred” to the Democratic Senate candidates.

Cortes noted that the phenomenon of Biden receiving vastly more votes than the local Senate candidate occurred primarily in swing states like Georgia. In states like Wyoming, there was no need to gin up excess votes for Biden, so the former vice president ran in lockstep with the Democratic Senate candidates.

Now, however, the Democrats desperately need to gin up excess votes in Georgia for Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock. If they do so without indulging in fraud, more power to them. But the existence of so many “Biden only” ballots in Georgia suggests the presence of fraud in one form or another, as well as the likelihood of an attempted repeat performance in the runoffs.



TOPICS: Conspiracy; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: anomalies; election; elections; fraud; georgia

1 posted on 11/10/2020 9:01:41 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Is this evidentiary? I wish I knew more about Election Law. I should get off FR and start learning that :)


2 posted on 11/10/2020 9:10:55 PM PST by olivia3boys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“I’m betting that in the Georgia runoffs, most of those 95,801 votes will be “transferred” to the Democratic Senate candidates”

Assuming they can pull the same scam again.

Which is a big assumption. This time everyone will be paying attention. As in, the whole country.


3 posted on 11/10/2020 9:12:11 PM PST by Regulator (It's Fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

We need a county breakdown to know where to go for evidence.


4 posted on 11/10/2020 9:14:45 PM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Reverse Wickard v Filburn (1942) - and - ISLAM DELENDA EST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

Atlanta for sure
& anywhere else Stacey Abrams is “helping” with the vote


5 posted on 11/10/2020 9:18:31 PM PST by rainee (Her)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

allegedly, the four or five counties in and around atlanta, plus henry. much numerically smaller (but still strategically significant for the future) amounts in about 8 more counties.

:-(


6 posted on 11/10/2020 9:19:04 PM PST by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

They can pull the same scam again easily.

The current Republican SoS in Georgia is a POSnand has assisted Stacey Abrams mail vote fraud all along.


7 posted on 11/10/2020 9:21:56 PM PST by GregH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: olivia3boys

State Department Precedent Qualifies This 2020 Election as “Rigged”
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3903912/posts


8 posted on 11/10/2020 9:33:56 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Yep. Has all the same red flags and “tells.”


9 posted on 11/10/2020 9:38:55 PM PST by olivia3boys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; Lazamataz

FYI


10 posted on 11/10/2020 9:42:19 PM PST by Chgogal (#DisruptBidenÂ’sBananaRepublic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: olivia3boys
Is this evidentiary? I wish I knew more about Election Law. I should get off FR and start learning that :)

I don't think it's evidence in the courtroom sense, but it sure fails the "smell test" and the state legislatures should vote to directly assign their state's Electoral College voters under Article II of the Constitution.

11 posted on 11/10/2020 9:50:55 PM PST by libertylover (Election 2020: Make America Great Again or Burn it to the Ground. Choose one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Paul Mirengoff is a Trump supporter, but he’s seldom this emphatic about anything with regard to Trump. That he’s putting it all on the line here is pretty significant. He seems pretty confident that this is for real.


12 posted on 11/10/2020 9:55:19 PM PST by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Related article about the Dominion voting machines:

https://redstate.com/shipwreckedcrew/2020/11/10/a-federal-judge-predicted-election-day-chaos-in-atlanta-georgia-republicans-deserve-blame-n278044


13 posted on 11/10/2020 9:56:57 PM PST by EVO X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: olivia3boys

It’s circumstantial evidence, but plenty of people have gone to death row based on circumstantial evidence.


14 posted on 11/10/2020 10:14:10 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’m the first person to believe in voter fraud. But to say some people only voted Biden is not evidence. I was watching live streams on Election Day. You could see people who only voted one candidate - they were done in 10 secs. I have no doubt there was fraud, but to what extent ? And was it computer caused or manual - still waiting for solid evidence


15 posted on 11/10/2020 10:29:28 PM PST by 11th_VA (If the votes unfit, you must remit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA
But to say some people only voted Biden is not evidence.

Agreed. But hundreds of thousands of ballots something else.

16 posted on 11/10/2020 10:32:34 PM PST by kevao (BIBLICAL JESUS: Give your money to the poor. SOCIALIST JESUS: Give your neighbor's money to the poor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

In the Peach State, President Trump’s vote total almost exactly tracked the vote totals for the Republican senate candidates, separated by merely 818 votes out of 2.43 million votes Trump earned there. But, Joe Biden saw an astounding surplus of 95,801 votes over the Democratic Senate candidates.


I wonder if the relationship changed over time. Probably not discoverable until after full records are released, but could be interesting.


17 posted on 11/10/2020 10:36:35 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The undervote for the Democrat Senate candidate in Texas was 358,031 as of last Saturday. 7%. Far as I can tell the highest percentage ever. Does it reflect the ban on straight ticket voting? Or is it more nefarious. I’ve heard nothing from Texas Republicans.


18 posted on 11/11/2020 2:33:48 AM PST by Til I am the last man standing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Til I am the last man standing

Somewhat disappointing the people making the headlines with this do bother with the details. This should take a high school student about 2 hours to put together given the data should be readily available. Then match it to four years ago.....by county.

Something has changed in Georgia since4 years ago.

It is odd to me, Obama receives 65.9M votes in 2012, Hillary 62.9M votes and what does Biden have 75M......so the Dems have 9M more active and engaged voters than when Obama was reelected????????


19 posted on 11/11/2020 3:01:50 AM PST by SteelPSUGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SteelPSUGOP
" Obama receives 65.9M votes in 2012, Hillary 62.9M votes and what does Biden have 75M......so the Dems have 9M more active and engaged voters than when Obama was reelected????????"

Yes, Steel, you are supposed to believe it and like it.

Not only that, now we are going to have to rewrite all the statistics textbooks to reflect the new reality.

20 posted on 11/13/2020 4:28:44 AM PST by Former Proud Canadian (Islam---At war with Western Civilization for 1400 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson