Posted on 10/09/2020 7:52:35 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
This is a follow-up to yesterday’s article, in which I exposed the fact that the CDC does not have the COVID coronavirus in its possession, because it is “unavailable.” Their word, not mine.
The CDC is admitting the virus hasn’t been isolated. In other words, its existence is unproven.
You need to realize the CDC, during its own published confession (see below), is discussing this explosive situation in the context of instructing the world how to perform the PCR test.
The test to detect a virus that isn’t there.
This would be on the order of NASA issuing a guide for navigating a fleet of ships to a planet whose existence has not been established—and the population of the whole world is going to board those ships for the voyage.
The CDC is saying: here is how you detect the virus in a human, here is the test on which we’re going to rely, here is the test on the basis of which we’re going to identify all case numbers and demand all lockdowns—except we don’t have the virus.
Why don’t they have it?
Because they can’t isolate it. That’s obvious.
If they could isolate it, they would.
Let’s not tap dance around this central fact. Let’s not make excuses for the CDC. They have a problem the size of Jupiter. It’s their problem, not ours. But they’re foisting their problem on us, in the form of a STORY ABOUT A PANDEMIC. AND ALL THE LOCKDOWNS THAT FLOW FROM THE STORY.
(Excerpt) Read more at blog.nomorefakenews.com ...
Trump, an overweight man in his 70s, beat COVID over a weekend.
Mad cow insane democrat mayors and govenors destroyed their economies and threw millions out of their jobs over a lie.
Why do these authors talk in circles.
ChiComs need to pay.
If this is true, Fauxi, Birx and a pile of "experts" and politicians need to be locked up and the key thrown away.
At best, the CDC has said some stuff that is contradictory. They need to explain.
I had it. I’m 70, a little overweight and no underlying conditions.
Took me 14 days to beat it, and at times, it was pretty darn nasty...very nasty.
I can certainly see where someone with underlying conditions would have a rough time of it.
But I’m still here and pretty much back to normal.
This thing, by far, is not an instant “death sentence”.
Trump may look overweight but he’s been wearing a vest to deflect bullets since before he was elected. Look at the pictures, he’s usually wearing a jacket or a coat. There’s a vest under there.
Because they are FOS. They are using artificially produced copies instead of virus isolates from some poor schmuck’s blood serum.
Scientifically illiterates keep banging the table because they have no facts they can understand.
BTTT!!!!
The point was influencing the election by crushing the country.
No more, no less.
Pong
I have often wondered how a test could be sophisticated enough to tell the difference between covid19 or any other corona virus. Do they actually have electron microscopes able to see the “Made in China” label with the date and time stamp?
So just to get this straight. We are taking the word of a blogger as gospel truth. You truly believe that there is no CoVId and this is all a complete conspiracy. You truly believe the there is no SARS 2 despite previous corona virus species yielding MERS and SARS the original.
You somehow think this kooky conspiracy theory actually makes our side reputable and in the game to advocate for conservative solutions to this issue including free market therapeutics and vaccination.
Ok.... this article is beyond fringe and is downright kooky.
They own the patent on it which means they manufactured it
Exactly.
I’m with you. The author of this piece is an idiot and a clickbaiter and those who buy his sophistry are, well, not very smart.
could be kooky, for sure..but what could the cited CDC report language mean?
No idea if the author is an idiot or not. I didn’t recognize the name of the source so I give it slightly more benefit of the doubt than CNN, AP, NBC, etc. which are known liars or Babylon Bee which is funny.
Page 39 is discussing the “Limit of Detection” for the PCR test.
They want to know how many individual corona viruses must be present in a one micro-liter sample before a PCR test shows a positive test.
“Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available...”
Note the word “quantified.”
Apparently, they would like to test the “Limit of Detection” against micro-liter samples of live virus that have a known number of viruses in each sample.
However, they do not have quantified live virus samples, so they have to evaluate the PCR test against quantified lab grown virus samples.
I have no medical training, but after reading the paragraph several times and thinking about it, that is what I see when I read it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.