Posted on 08/04/2020 6:00:34 AM PDT by USA Conservative
The debate was labeled Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. vs Alan Dershowitz: The Great Vaccine Debate! This historic debate between Children’s Health Defense Chairman Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., and Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz happened few days ago but not one mainstream media giant decided to report about it!
On July 12, signs went up on anti-vaccine pages about a live debate between Robert F Kennedy Jr and Alan Dershowitz.
The debate opened with a previous quote from Dershowitz that said that the state has a right to compel people to be vaccinated, that there is no constitutional right not to be vaccinated, and that “the state has the power to literally take you to a doctor’s office and plunge a needle into your arm.”
Video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohS4Ag4RGMQ&feature=emb_title
In the debate with Alan Dershowitz, Bobby Kennedy Jr. shared:
I think it is really important for our democracy to be able to have spirited, civil discussions about important issues like this. This is an issue that has been on the news 24 hours a day for the last four months and yet there’s no debate happening about this. It’s all repetition of orthodoxies and government proclamations and democracy functions only when we have free thought and information. Democracy is best often crafted in a furnace of heated, spirited debate.
The bombshell of the debate happened when Robert F. Kennedy’s son claimed that Dr. Tony Fauci and the Gates Foundation stand to make a hefty profit from the manufacture of the COVID-19 vaccine.
Kennedy said:
The problem is Anthony Fauci put $500 million of our dollars into that vaccine. He owns half the patent. He and these five guys who are working for him were entitled to collect royalties from that.
So you have a corrupt system and now they have a vaccine that is too big to fail. And instead of saying this was a terrible, terrible mistake, they are saying we are going to order 2 billion doses of this and you’ve got to understand Alan with these COVID vaccines these companies are playing with house money. They’re not spending any dime, they have no liability. Well if they kill 20 people or 200 people or 2,000 people in their clinical trials, big deal. They have zero liability. And guess what, they’ve wasted none of their money because we’re giving them money to play with.
The full debate below:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IfnJi7yLKgE&feature=emb_title The election of President Donald Trump raised grave concerns for the future of vaccination in the United States. Trump had frequently embraced—both before and during his election campaign allegations linking childhood vaccines to autism. Shortly before his inauguration, he met with Robert F. Kennedy Jr, one of the most prominent and vocal critics of vaccine safety and current US vaccine policy, who announced after that meeting that he would lead a presidential “vaccine safety commission” charged with investigating these topics.
When it comes to mandatory COVID-19 vaccines President Trump respects the opinion of its citizens.
Back in May President Trump said that the US economy will begin reopening even without a vaccine.
“Vaccine or no vaccine we’re back and we’re starting the process,” he said.
Trump once again insisted the coronavirus will somehow disappear even without vaccination, a prospect his own top health advisers have dismissed as unrealistic.
“I think we’re going have a vaccine in the pretty near future and if we do we’re going to really be a big step ahead, and if we don’t, it’ll be like so many other cases where you had a problem come in, it’ll go away at some point, it’ll go away,” Trump said.
He also indicated that vaccination won’t be mandatory. “Not everybody’s going to want to get it,” he said.
Watch the moment below: (can't copy the link)
Some Americans question the safety of vaccination.
More than one in 10 U.S. adults would turn down a coronavirus vaccine, according to recent polling.
Research from Morning Consult found 14 percent said they would not get vaccinated against COVID-19.
The age group most likely to turn down such a treatment were those between 35 and 44, at 18 percent.
While in political splits, Republicans were most likely to turn it down at 20 percent, followed by independents at 16, then Democrats at 7.
What is your opinion on this debate?
Scroll down to leave a comment below.
All the lying sack of sh*t Kennedy has to do is post the patent no.
His wife works at NIH. A govt employee.
The phony report that she is related to maxwell has been debunked, except for stupid ignorant morons who do not know how to read anything other than nutwad sites.
The idea that Fauci could profit from a vaccine is not insane, but Kennedy's specific claim's absolutely are.
I never heard anything about Maxwell and her. What assumptions you have.
No, I was talking about her official role with immunizations and her background with drugs and human experimentation.
Someone can miss out on a lot of information when they have tunnel vision, or paranoid.
Trump should declare that Gates and Fauci will donate the vaccine for free, no tax deduction either.
“ownership in Remdesivir”
Fauci doesn’t own Remdesivir.
-To be fair, can anyone fond this patent?-
Used to be that if you worked for the government and got a patent, the government owned it and if there are royalties, you got some small percentage.
If anyone’s name is on a patent, it will show up on a US Patent Office search with the Patent Number.
“How does that diminish in any way his thesis that fauci has a huge conflict of interest owing to his patent ownership”
Fauci doesn’t own a patent for Remdesivir.
“Trump should declare that Gates and Fauci will donate the vaccine for free, no tax deduction either.”
He would only say that if he was prone to saying very stupid things.
I understand he has a significant stake in Gilead Science, which does produce Remdesivir. THAT is a conflict of interest
BKJr needs to put down the crack pipe. And you need to stop listening to liars.
“I understand he has a significant stake in Gilead Science, which does produce Remdesivir.”
And how did you come to that “understanding”?
Saw it quoted in some articles posted on FR
The Maxwell story pimped by most FR is that she is maxwells sister.
He role at NIH is the chief medical Ethics section. I suspect that vaccines probably have some connection there, as in, who gets them and in what priority, etc.
I seriously doubt either her or fauci get personal compensation as govt employees for their official decisions. Outside employment is also tightly
Regulated.
The story that fauci has a patent is similarly highly doubtful. While the govt som times gets a patent or shares a patent, employees I doubt don’t get patents for doing their govt jobs.
Personally I have little use for fauci but this story is just nonsense.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.