Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump SCOTUS Win Protects Religious Liberty And Little Sisters Of The Poor
Noisy Room ^ | July 11, 2020 | Daniel John Sobieski

Posted on 07/11/2020 4:26:37 PM PDT by raptor22

Reports of Trump’s SCOTUS picks failing to produce wins while Chief Justice John Roberts leads us straight to perdition by the chicken littles of the right apparently have been greatly exaggerated judging by the Supreme Court’s 7-2 supermajority decision upholding President Donald J. Trump’s executive order finally and totally freeing that group of charitable nuns known as the Little Sisters of the Poor from the atheistic deep state abortion and contraceptive mandate that came with ObamaCare. Not only is Trump’s conservative and originalist makeover of the federal judiciary proceeding apace, even at the highest level, but also it appears to be winning over the hearts and minds of those who were once hard-core liberal opponents. As Steven Ertelt at LifeSiteNews.Com reports:

The Supreme Court issued a ruling today upholding a pro-life order from President Donald Trump that protected the Little Sisters of the Poor from being forced to pay for abortion-causing drugs under their health insurance plan. Abortion advocates have spent years trying to force the Catholic nuns to fund the destruction of unborn babies in abortions.

(Excerpt) Read more at noisyroom.net ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics; Religion; Society
KEYWORDS: abortion; catholic; catholicchurch; contraceptives; littlesisters; noisyroom; prolife; religion; religiousliberty; scotus; supremercourt; unborn

1 posted on 07/11/2020 4:26:37 PM PDT by raptor22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: raptor22

On a vote like this roberts is safe from being the deciding vote, so its not an issue for him to vote this way

Our opinions of roberts is not based on one vote, its based on his pattern of voting and not coming through on key decisions when it was easy to


2 posted on 07/11/2020 4:34:45 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

The ruling that absolutely gobsmacked me wasn’t a Roberts ruling, but Gorsuch voting with the libs to give half of Oklahoma back to an Indian tribe. How twisted and downright stupid is that?


3 posted on 07/11/2020 4:44:48 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
The ruling that absolutely gobsmacked me wasn’t a Roberts ruling, but Gorsuch voting with the libs to give half of Oklahoma back to an Indian tribe. How twisted and downright stupid is that?

Except the ruling didn't “give” half of Oklahoma to some Indian tribe. In practice, all it means is that serious crimes will be prosecuted by the feds Instead of by local or state prosecutors. That's about it really.

4 posted on 07/11/2020 4:56:02 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

I dont get that ruling at all


5 posted on 07/11/2020 4:57:51 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson