Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Evidence Is Coming In: Virus Experts May Have Been Badly Wrong
The Revolutionary Act ^ | 04/16/2020

Posted on 04/16/2020 5:39:12 AM PDT by Liberty7732

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: NobleFree

Not a random sample, not a controlled experiment, but evidence nonetheless. You have a large “vulnerable” population and every single individual was infected and remained asymptomatic.

This is not the Spanish Flu.


41 posted on 04/16/2020 6:46:16 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

” In the future when we have a REAL health crisis, no one will listen.”

They just demonstrated that their hired help don’t give a damn about your rights. They’ll use guns.


42 posted on 04/16/2020 6:48:06 AM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Liberty7732

Everyone now knows that the data-less mathematical models built by the pretend “mathematicians” at the CDC proved to be worse than useless, predicting millions of deaths, then hundreds of thousands, then . . . who knows. Nevertheless, D.C. always worships “models” and numbers regardless of how truthful they are — as long as they can be used to “justify” more power, money, and control over our lives by D.C.

Even the surgeon general, a careerist “public” health bureaucrat, has condemned the CDC models as essentially useless. He now boats that his decisions are now based on real data, not contrived mathematical models constructed by the same kinds of ideological leftist fanatics who create all those bogus “climate change models.” But his “data” are every bit as useless as the CDC models, as anyone who has been paying any attention knows. It is now widely known that the CDC has explicitly instructed all doctors to falsify death certificates by labeling the cause of death COVID-19 even if the deceased suffered from numerous other diseases such as cancer, diabetes, heart disease, lung disease, kidney disease, tuberculosis, etc., as long as it is “surmised” (not even proven with a blood test) that he or she also had coronavirus in his or her system. My guess is that the real number of deaths from COVID-19 is probably less than one third of the reported number, if that. Even the reported number is still less than deaths from the seasonal flu this year as reported by the CDC itself.


43 posted on 04/16/2020 6:50:46 AM PDT by all the best (You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Not a random sample, not a controlled experiment, but evidence nonetheless. You have a large “vulnerable” population

Evidence of how the novel coronavirus affects street bums. As a vulnerable population they've survived every infectious disease that has come along, with minimal if any medical care and living in unsanitary conditions; natural selection ensures that live bums are the hardiest people around.

44 posted on 04/16/2020 6:55:21 AM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: brookwood

Math is kind of hard for you?


45 posted on 04/16/2020 6:57:59 AM PDT by Dartoid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

A lot of people didn’t listen this time and still aren’t listening.

The successful containment of Ebola, SARS, MERS, and the management of the less lethal H1N1 left many people claiming this was a hoax. Never mind that all of the above were real threats that were managed.

Many are still in denial.

If we manage this, they will say the next pandemic is a hoax too.


46 posted on 04/16/2020 7:06:27 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Liberty7732
these shutdowns may well have destroyed the strongest economy in history...

It was the only way to beat Trump in 2020.

47 posted on 04/16/2020 7:12:53 AM PDT by SunTzuWu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL

In 10 days, at that rate, it will have caught up.


48 posted on 04/16/2020 7:24:05 AM PDT by DownInFlames (Galsd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NobleFree

Not particularly hardy, street bums have an appalling mortality rate. Their bodies are already overstressed by the their life style. The last thing they need is a virus.


49 posted on 04/16/2020 7:28:03 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice

Very interesting read.


50 posted on 04/16/2020 7:39:18 AM PDT by Pride in the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brookwood

1. “If I hear the name Jay Bhattacharya one more time I will vomit.” Go ahead. I have no idea who in the h Jay Bhattacharya is.

2. “Normal seasonal flu kills 30,000 per year in the US.” No. The average of the last to seasons together is closer to 48,000, and has been as high as 61,000 (2017-2018 season).

3. “But more than .1% of New York City has already died of Covid19 - 10,000 out of 9 million!. A. Wrong. Maybe you lumped all of NY state into NYC. B. National averages always include locals that have higher than average rates and lower than average rates, and they often relate to population density. C. Just because a locale has a higher rate than is expected for a national average does not make using the national average wrong. With NYC’s population density its expected rate of the seasonal flu itself is higher than a national average, on a per million population basis. Communicable diseases move faster in more densely populated places. That does not make them the standard to use, nor does it make national averages wrong.


51 posted on 04/16/2020 7:40:27 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Texas resident

“All kidding aside, I see lots of people around here with no protection in the grocery. Most of the old folks are wearing masks.”


I’ve been seeing the same. I often hit HEB after my chemo and radiation treatments and the majority of the younger folks aren’t bothering with masks.

Old farts like me are masked up with at least a bandanna or a crap home made mask. Very few have a top grade N95 or equivalent mask.

What I see most is the fear and oppressive atmosphere around me. People are scuttling around head down and shoulders hunched like they’re waiting for a blow to fall. Not what you expect from everyday Texans!

Texans smile a lot and shake hands a lot. That’s the culture and the history. Take that away and things change pretty drastically and not for the better.


52 posted on 04/16/2020 7:46:17 AM PDT by JJ_Folderol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Morpheus2009

30,000 is an old number. The CDC counted over 70,000 flu deaths in 2018-2019, and around 80,000 in 2017-2018.


Those were 1) not counts but estimates, 2) the top end of the estimates, and 3) outliers.

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/past-seasons.html

Deaths Range Death/ symptomatic case
Season Estimate 95% U I
2010-2011 37,000 (32,000 – 51,000) 0.176%
2011-2012 12,000 (11,000 – 23,000) 0.129%
2012-2013 43,000 (37,000 – 57,000) 0.126%
2013-2014 38,000 (33,000 – 50,000) 0.127%
2014-2015 51,000 (44,000 – 64,000) 0.170%
2015-2016 23,000 (17,000 – 35,000) 0.096%
2016-2017 38,000 (29,000 – 61,000) 0.131%

Preliminary estimates*
2017-2018* 61,000 (46,000 – 95,000) 0.136%
2018-2019* 34,157 (26,339, 52,664) 0.096%
Average . . . .37,462 . . . . . . . . . . 0.132%


53 posted on 04/16/2020 7:46:56 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
As a vulnerable population they've survived every infectious disease that has come along, with minimal if any medical care and living in unsanitary conditions; natural selection ensures that live bums are the hardiest people around.

street bums have an appalling mortality rate.

Which supports my statement that the ones who survive are hardy.

54 posted on 04/16/2020 7:48:33 AM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: BobL

“2500 people died from Coronavirus yesterday in the US, but 30,000 died of the flu each year. Not even close.”

Not a true statement. The accuracy of the CDC annual flu numbers is very questionable and is based on estimates that have a range of double from low to high. They are nowhere near as accurate as the death numbers for this virus, which probably do err on the high side for people who would have died in the normal 8,000 per day death rate in the US.

The worst flu year (17-18) had a tally from two non CDC sources of 15,600 deaths for that flu season. My take is our count now is closer to the way that count was made ( see Fluvu numbers ).

When this is over the US Covid 18 death total will be close to 50,000, and more than a third will have been over 65 with other issues. It will have been the worst world-wide illness to date, but not the one predicted from the early Italian and NYC numbers.

The left will issue blame numbers and try to dump Trump while using the virus to refinance the top 8 0r 9 states that were hit the hardest; those being all Denocratic strongholds. The rest will have to pay from a very weak economy.


55 posted on 04/16/2020 7:57:46 AM PDT by JeanLM (Obama proves melanin is just enough to win elections)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: brookwood

“But more than .1% of New York City has already died of Covid19 - 10,000 out of 9 million!”

Umm...10,000 ÷ 9,000,000 = 0.0011. Thats .11%. Even with the giant blue text.


56 posted on 04/16/2020 8:06:36 AM PDT by Basket_of_Deplorables (Unredact the 99 Collyer Report!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
at the 95% confidence level, survival rates are close to 98%.

98% survival = 2% death.

57 posted on 04/16/2020 8:09:02 AM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: NobleFree

At the 50% confidence level, survival rates are greater than 99.5%.


58 posted on 04/16/2020 8:19:37 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Liberty7732

I think many people assume that “experts in government” are cream of the crop. They most certainly are not. The actual top dog experts do NOT work in government. The best-of-the-best work exclusively in private industry, for lots more money.

I’ve worked with “experts” at the NIH. Top dogs there. They were just average at best. One project, doing cutting edge research on MRI’s at Hopkins, privately funded, had several REAL top dogs on it. They all, without exception, laughed at the guys at the NIH, who were a short drive away. They were, and are, a joke, to real scientists. We had to deal with the NIH guys, as regulations required their signoff on certain aspects. Arrogant, little Kings, kiss the ring crap. Little big shots making 1/10th what the actual science guys pulled in.

Fauci and Brix may be experts in the government, but they wouldn’t last a month in private industry, even working in their field on projects targeted at their expertise. They may get accolades, and high praise from other government people and the media, but that closed world isn’t where the real science guys hang out.

There are at least 100 actual experts, brilliant people, in private industry or high academic positions (who get $ from private industry, on their boards) that are so much better in their field than Fauci and Brix. Those two clowns are mediocre, at best.


59 posted on 04/16/2020 8:21:08 AM PDT by Basket_of_Deplorables (Unredact the 99 Collyer Report!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThePatriotsFlag

He actually did?


60 posted on 04/16/2020 8:41:41 AM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson