Posted on 03/20/2020 5:46:44 PM PDT by foundedonpurpose
MUST SEE: Chloroquine Already Used on Coronavirus in US — Study Shows 100% Success Rate — And May Act as Preventative to Virus (VIDEO)
Women System March 20, 2020 2 Comments 0 comment
Dr. Mihael Polymeropoulos, the co-founder and former CEO of Vanda Pharmaceuticals, joined Tucker Carlson on Thursday night to discuss the use of chloroquine in the treatment of coronavirus. On Monday Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, reported that the anti-viral medication chloroquine is showing success in fighting the coronavirus. ** An Effective Treatment for Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dr. Gregory Rigano, the co-author of the study, later went on with Laura Ingraham and then Tucker Carlson to discuss the results from the chloroquine study. Dr. Rigano announced that their study found that COVID-19 patients who took hydroxy-chloroquine were found free of the disease in 6 days. The patients were testing negative for the coronavirus in six days! Dr. Rigano also said taking choroquine could act as a preventative. On Wednesday night Dr. Rigano told Tucker Carlson that a new peer-reviewed study out of France found that chloroquine had a 100% success rate in treating patients with coronavirus.
(Excerpt) Read more at womensystems.com ...
http://www.womensystems.com/2020/03/must-see-chloroquine-already-used-on.html
Chloroquine Already Used on Coronavirus in US — Study Shows 100% Success Rate — And May Act as Preventative to Virus (VIDEO)
“Dr. Anthony I-want-to-wreck-the-economy Fauci threw cold water on this. He basically called it anecdotal at best.”
That is a distortion of what he said.
it's an approved drug for malaria and apparently other maladies. They know the dosing. It's being used and is successful.
Clarification: “lost” means they quit taking the drug. NOT that they died.
Yes, shortages already. I read earlier an Israeli company is shipping a lot of it to the US. And Bayer is making a lot of it available for free.
They will need to ramp up production, but the process and infrastructure is already there. They do have some things to do to roll it out, including verifying the tests and studies that are going on now. There really isn’t any reason they can’t just do it, it’s already approved and we know a lot about the drug’s effects, toxicity, etc. Should happen fast and I expect they aren’t holding back for a few ‘t’s to be crossed and ‘i’s to be dotted.
On the other hand, if there are flaws in the studies or other issues, they won’t want to present false hope.
Deep state doesn’t like it at all.
I’d like to see them try this medicine on regular colds and flu.
That runs counter to the fact that Trump mentioned chloroquine several times in the briefing yesterday and Fauci is one of his foremost advisors on this.
But the media will still find a way to slam Trump about it.
He wasn't implying anything. He said specifically what he meant. He was speaking as a good scientist. A lot of people don't know how to handle that. It the words he said that matter, not what anyone thinks his unspoken thoughts were.
As a scientist it makes me want to pick up a heavy object and cosh the AH every time I hear this phrase.
It's a meaningless put-down. When you need a new solution to a problem hypothesis are formed surround it that fall into a number of categories: 1. Wild-eyed unfounded speculation that merits no further consideration. 2. Reasonable hypotheses that have nevertheless been soundly disproven by incontestable evidence; 3. Hypotheses for which there is some evidence, though it is not firmly established and more evidence is needed. 4. Hypotheses that are soundly supported by overwhelming incontestable data.
Grad grinds - the guys who never had an original idea in their lives - dismiss category 3 as "anecdotal" every single blessed time. It's what they do. Sure it might not work, but of all the ideas that do work, this is where almost all of them come from.
Fauci might be a careful bureaucrat, but he is never going to figure out how to solve a new problem.
As long as it isn’t the Gamma Globulin shot!!
I could hardly walk after and if you didn’t walk
around you really couldn’t walk.
> He basically called it anecdotal at best.
And called the other doctors liars.
No he didn't. He said it standing next to the President, and he didn't disagree with the president. He even said it showed potential. He simply explained that the specific evidence being cited was anecdotal, not a clinical trial. He was not wrong. Nor was Trump when he said it showed promise.
Fauci and the FDA guy won’t be in the picture much longer.
I wouldn't use the word "anecdotal" for this either. But the distinction he was drawing between the existing evidence and evidence from clinical trials was valid.
The doctors claiming that it works also claim that they ran a controlled study.
It’s not that complicated for a drug that everything is already known about.
Let people try it.
Fauci is an honorable man and doing his best to keep our country from harm. I like him and think he is doing a great job.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.