Posted on 03/15/2020 5:16:46 PM PDT by RArtfulogerDodger
... For three and a half years, Democrats along with their fake news media minions have sought “the big one” to remove Trump from the White House.
All of their this-is-the-big-one attacks on Trump have bombed out: Russian collusion, Stormy Daniels, Michael Cohen, the Mueller Report, the Ukraine phone call, the 25th Amendment, the Emoluments Clauses, quid pro quo, bribery, and far too many for me to remember.
Barely able to contain their excitement, Democrats and fake news media believe they have finally found their kryptonite to take down this Superman president. They are confident that their insidious, evil manufactured hysteria over the coronavirus is The Big One that will end Trump’s presidency.
Any one of the bogus attacks launched against Trump would have ended the candidacy or presidency of any other Republican. Clearly, God’s hand of protection is on Donald J. Trump. Their latest attack, corona-mania, will fail also.
We have seen Democrats and fake news media repeatedly use their tactic of creating a false narrative, which they demand that everyone embrace. Anyone with the guts to rebel is publicly humiliated, branded irresponsible, deemed a truth-denier, diagnosed crazy, a racist, sexist, and homophobe.
Horrifyingly, Democrats and fake news media seek to criminalize and imprison anyone who disagrees with their false narratives. A coalition of attorneys general sought to prosecute anyone who disagreed with Obama’s belief in man-made climate change. Obama’s DOJ vowed to prosecute anyone who contradicts his statement that Islam is a religion of peace.
READ Coronavirus: why it’s not like the other fake epidemics And yet, Obama-worshiping progressives accuse Trump of behaving as if he were a king.
Democrats’ and fake news media’s latest bogus narrative which they demand that we embrace is the coronavirus as the worst thing that has ever hit America, and we’re all gonna die because Trump is in the White House. Anyone who dares to publicly say otherwise is immediately gang assaulted by the media.
Well aware of the consequences of daring not to embrace this narrative, like falling dominoes, corporations are canceling all public gatherings.
The Bible speaks of evildoers setting a trap for someone only to fall into it themselves. “If you set a trap for others, you will get caught in it yourself” (Proverbs 26:27). “Let them be caught in the trap they set for me” (Psalm 35:8).
In their frenzied quest to use corona-mania to “destroy Trump,” Democrats and fake news media find themselves caught in their own trap — in the awkward position of advocating for homeschooling. Democrats are aggressively seeking to ban homeschooling. Progressives despise homeschooling because it stops them from indoctrinating students with hatred for Christians and America while implementing the LGBT agenda.
Democrats and fake news media say screw your constitutional right to free speech. They decide the “correct” view of an issue. If you do not conform, they will destroy you.
Here are a few examples. Trump along with a majority of Americans are fine with “legal” immigration. Democrats and fake news media say if you do not surrender to their desire for open borders and rolling out the red carpet to illegals, you are a racist hater of people of color.
READ Did you know that Rick Steves is an anti-Semite and anti-Zionist? Christians along with other Americans instinctively know that marriage is between one man and one woman. When a Muslim gunman massacred homosexuals in a bar, Democrats and fake news media absurdly said everyone who supports marriage is responsible for the massacre.
Do you see how their tyrannical bullying works, folks? If you do not surrender to Democrats’ and fake news media’s mandated view of an issue, they will lie about you and make your life Hell on Earth.
Continuing to prove himself to be a courageous, peerless voice of truth, I tip my hat to Rush Limbaugh for refusing to surrender to Democrats’ and fake news media’s mandated bogus doom-and-gloom narrative about the coronavirus.
When I turned on my TV, I heard a reporter say, “And now, the effects of the coronavirus.” I thought, in reality, the coronavirus has had very little effect. The reporter was really reporting on the irresponsible, despicable hysteria created by Democrats and fake news media solely to take out Trump. They will fail....
I haven’t even looked, but I guarantee the lancet probably supports human caused global warming, and has an article about the health consequences of it. The lancet probably has articles extolling the virtues of chopping your penis off. But yes, let’s all destroy the Economy because of the opinion of the Lancet
You assume the goal was to use it on another country, what if they meant to fine tune it to take out only their own none producers but it got out before they perfected it?
It's a "mixed blessing" for China, and too many convenient pluses in elder-care expenses. Their population won't notice. It's payback against US tariffs. Europe's NATO is harmed. Probably many-more "benefits" out there...
It’s quite obvious we are going form 11 Wu Flu deaths today to 11,000,000. Probably by next week. Why can’t you see that? Normalcy bias much?
5 % kill rate . So where did they bury the 20,000,000 Chinese ? Or are they immune . I mean they must be . They’ve had it since November and only 4,000 dead. A country that ignored it for 2 months before acknowledging it. Which begs the question why would it not have gotten here earlier? Since we have things called airplanes.
What I think is that the press is so desperate to "get Trump" that they're trying to blow it out of all proportion. The part I disagree with, is that this is fake.
I think it REALLY is that dangerous (not death rate, but hospitalization) and the Press is so stupid they don't get it yet.
How much did Obama pay you to ignore it when swine flu was killing 1800 children out of flu season? I
Exactly . I don’t think these pearl clutchers know it’s a lot more dangerous to crash society then to get commie cough.
All these convenient videos on Instagram of people dying from commie cough. Why havent they shown any pictures of the mile long pits they’d need In China for all the dead ?
If the press doesn’t get there, and social distancing is effective, then perhaps the idiocy in the media can work for us.
All hands on deck - slow the transmission rate, and slow the serious case rate (which we also do not know).
We seem to be in violent agreement, on most things.
Thank you for posting this.
Love Loyd Marcus. Met him many years ago at a TEA party rally. He was a speaker and also mingled in the crowd. Very inspiring man.
China has a surplus of military age males due to the decades of the one-child policy.
His friend is in the virus Biz. Go ask him about it.
That assumes away the law of libel, which the Warren Court thoroughly subverted in its 1964 NYT v. Sullivan decision. That decision, written by Wm. Brennan and passed unanimously with enthusiastic concurrences, asserted that". . . libel can claim no talismanic immunity from constitutional limitations. It must be measured by standards that satisfy the First Amendment”There is one minor problem with that assertion: prior to 1964 no court had ever held that the First Amendment touched libel law. At all.This can be understood by reference to the well-known fact that the Federalists took for granted that the Constitution had no effect on the rights of the people, and the Antifederalists demanded a bill of rights - which the Federalists agreed to add by amendment.
The Federalists needed that Bill of Rights, and they needed to avoid controversy over the way they structured it. Accordingly,
Amendment 9
covers all rights, whether or not they affected an enumerated right (and the enumerated rights were only those rights which tyrants had historically denied). The First Amendment does not enumerate the right not to be libeled, but that right existed in 1788 just as surely as “the” freedom of the press existed then. “The” freedom of the press was limited by libel and pornograhy laws, and the First Amendment did not erase those laws.
- The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
In pointing that out, Antonin Scalia mentioned that you could make an argument that perhaps officials and judges should not have been able to sue for libel - but in fact they were not prohibited from doing so. And that is what matters. In an “originalist” understanding.
But the reality is that the Sullivan decision has promoted a tyranny by “the media,” and Republican politicians should sue for libel in defiance of Sullivan. 9-0 decision or no. Because the Warren Court no longer sits.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.