[bitt]

p

[bitt]

p

[JonPreston]

BOOM! BOOM! and a flying TICK TOCK!!!

[bigbob]

Gee whiz Wally, it’s those Hoft kids pimping their blog again!

[griswold3]

This is the crux of the matter. Crowdstrike generated the entire narrative of the Russian hack (which never happened)
Mention Crowdstrike to a “ progressive” and the paplovian response is “debunked”.

[Moe-Patrick]

I have been watching George Webb on youtube. He is hard to follow due to the terminology he uses. The gist of it is many players we have all heard of before (Schiff, Stroyk, Buttigieg, Biden, Clinton, Awan brothers, PapaD, Flynn, Carter Page, etc.) are deeply involved in weapons, spooks, etc. He covers crowdstrike today. Make of it what you will but he has made hundreds of videos. The downside is that his presentation is complex. He says that he will have a documentary made in a few months to lay out the data in a presentable manner. It will add detail to what Glen Beck did on Ukraine. Just thought I would let you know there is someone out there collecting data. I posted a link below for his video today on more details about crowdstrike and why they are backing off of there original claim.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dcfApYW2PkE&t=963s

[upchuck]

How come every article on GP is BREAKING? Or, like this one, not only is it BREAKING but it’s also EXCLUSIVE.

Maybe Joe Hoft should go read the fable about the little boy who cried “WOLF!”

Rant off.

[dfwgator]

Or as Lockner would say.....

“Breaking News....Breaking News....Breaking News....Breaking News!!!!”

[steve86]

I guess that’s interesting to somebody

[yoe]

"...corrupt Obama Appointed DC judge, Amy Berman Jackson, wouldn’t let him bring this up in his case, even though his charges were based on the entire scam."......Let's not forget the rogue FBI i.e. under Obama; Comey, Clapper, Brennan, Stroyk & Lisa, and the Deep State which included Bill and Hillary Clinton and the Obamas, both Michelle and Barack, their lackeys...are in the thousands, all working to remove a duly elected president...these people are as corrupt as we think Mexico, a failed state, is, or as corrupt Russia is.

[Hostage]

CROWDFART BOOM!

Boom-lok-a-lok-a!

[Logical me]

So?

[ScottinVA]

HUGE!! BREAKING!!

yawwwwnnnnnnn....

[Lurkinanloomin]

The biggest fraud in US history is the Kenyan from Indonesia.

[MileHi]

The entre basis for the Mueller report that Russia hacked the DNC WAS the Crowdstrike claim.

[Robert DeLong]

For some reason when I click on the link it cuts off at this point (using Firefox browser):

The Editor’s note was as follows:

This is fake news. While it’s oft-repeated by the propagandists in the MSM legacy corporate media, there is no evidence that the emails were stolen and released by “Russian intelligence operatives.” The emails were released by WikiLeaks and an entity called Guccifer 2.0. WikiLeaks denies it got them from any Russians, and Julian Assange has hinted that they were stolen by murdered DNC operative Seth Rich. The FBI was denied access to the emails and the conclusion that they were stolen and released by “Russian intelligence operatives” was made by the DNC-hired cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike, which has ties to Ukrainian oligarchs and the Council on Foreign Relations. –BL

A few days later, this past Tuesday, Personal Liberty reportedly received an email from John Eddy, Executive Vice President of the PR firm Goldin. The email follows:

My firm works with CrowdStrike and we read your article titled “Trump seeks to boost Sanders and foment discord among Democrats” (https://personalliberty.com/trump-seeks-to-boost

When I copy the link and take it to my google browser I get the entire end of the article, so I will post it in case anyone else is having the same issue:

The Editor’s note was as follows:

This is fake news. While it’s oft-repeated by the propagandists in the MSM legacy corporate media, there is no evidence that the emails were stolen and released by “Russian intelligence operatives.” The emails were released by WikiLeaks and an entity called Guccifer 2.0. WikiLeaks denies it got them from any Russians, and Julian Assange has hinted that they were stolen by murdered DNC operative Seth Rich. The FBI was denied access to the emails and the conclusion that they were stolen and released by “Russian intelligence operatives” was made by the DNC-hired cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike, which has ties to Ukrainian oligarchs and the Council on Foreign Relations. –BL

A few days later, this past Tuesday, Personal Liberty reportedly received an email from John Eddy, Executive Vice President of the PR firm Goldin. The email follows:

My firm works with CrowdStrike and we read your article titled “Trump seeks to boost Sanders and foment discord among Democrats” (https://personalliberty.com/trump-seeks-to-boost-sanders-and-foment-discord-among-democrats/ [personalliberty.com]). We need to request important updates to the article.

The article states that the “FBI was denied access to the emails and the conclusion that they were stolen and released by ‘Russian intelligence operatives’ was made by the DNC-hired cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike, which has ties to Ukrainian oligarchs and the Council on Foreign Relations.” This is incorrect.

CrowdStrike’s founders have no connections to Ukraine. The company also provided all forensic evidence and analysis to the FBI that they requested, and the conclusions have been fully supported by the US Intelligence community (https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/bears-midst-intrusion-democratic-national-committee/). Additionally, CrowdStrike was hired by the DNC to respond to the suspected breach of its servers, and did not do any investigations around the release of the information.

Could you please update the article for accuracy to clarify that CrowdStrike does not have ties to Ukraine, and that the company was hired by the DNC to investigate the hack of the servers?

Note the phrase from Crowdstrike’s PR firm, stating that Crowdstrike “did not do any investigations around the release of the information.”

UPDATE— We contacted the Crowdstrike’s PR Firm Goldin Solutions and they confirmed their email to Personal Liberty.

Now after three and a half years of the fraudulent Russia collusion scam being repeated so often that half of America believes that Russia hacked the DNC and gave their emails to WikiLeaks, Crowdstrike announces that it had nothing to do with assessing that Russians gave the emails to WikiLeaks??!!

So why is Crowdstrike announcing this now? Are they liable for fraud by not announcing this years ago? Their lack of a response allowed the coup against the President of the United States to progress! If they didn’t confirm the Russians gave the emails to WikiLeaks, then who did?

The Mueller report clearly states that Russians hacked the DNC and gave the hacked emails to WikiLeaks:

So if Crowdstrike now claims they didn’t confirm that Russians gave emails to WikiLeaks, then who the hell did? We believe that both Mueller and Crowdstrike are lacking candor!

[Spacetrucker]

Does anyone actually believe ANYTHING Gateway Pundit posts? Seriously, after the “Indictments Coming Monday Or Tuesday” garbage? JimRob should put them on the “Persona-Non-Grata” list and full-on ZOT anyone who even thinks about posting their trash. /rant

[lepton]

Did they not take a step back when called before Congress?

[Wuli]

1. G.P. as usual took forever - near the end - to get to any NEW point of information that had not been gone over by them and others before.

2. The Crowdstrike P.R. firm’s notice to the publisher Personal Liberty is written in typical P.R. verse, and cannot be taken to mean exactly what G.P. is claiming it means. That firm can easily and legitimately claim that Personal Liberty’s claim as to the meaning is wrong.

Amateurs.

[usconservative]

I wish I had the patience and knowledge to use FR's search engine to find the original thread where myself and a dozen or so other Infosec security professionals here completely ripped to shreds the original CrowdStrike write-up of the alleged Clinton email hack by the Russians.

We proved in short order using good old math, professional knowledge, logic and reasoning to prove why Shitlery Xlinton's email server wasn't "hacked" ... and that it was an inside job all along.

Laz I recall you being on that thread, I cannot remember who else was. Do you recall? Can you help find the original thread that completely dismantled the Crowdstrike report?