Posted on 02/13/2020 6:02:53 AM PST by Syafruddin Arsyad
From the early days of Iranian Revolution four decades ago, the Iranian regime has tried to spread its theocratic doctrine to the rest of the Middle East. The regime has, in the process, successfully made substantial number of Iraqi and Lebanese ‘civilians’ and ‘armed groups’ its core external support bases.
The Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who spearheads the regime, had maintained his charm among these external civilian and armed support bases for almost three and a half decade. However, the situation has been changing in the Middle East for last half a decade and the Iranian regime appears to be struggling to maintain its ‘civilian’ support bases in Lebanon and Iraq.
What’s worse for the regime is that Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is now losing his acceptability in the minds of even the young Iranians.
IRAQIS FRUSTRATED OVER IRANIAN INTERFERENCE
Although the majority of the Iraqi politicians—particularly the ones in the parliament—is biased towards Iran, the common Iraqi people do not share the same sentiment with their politicians.
The recent anti-government protests across Iraq have revealed the growing sentiment among the people against the Iranian interference in Iraq, as the protesters were, on many occasions, heard chanting the slogans against Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
Furthermore, the protesters had attacked the Iranian consulates three times in last two months: once in Karbala (on November 3. 2019) and twice in Najaf (on November 28 and December 1, 2019). During the Karbala attack, the Iraqi protesters replaced Iranian flag with the Iraqi flag, as they chanted “Iran out of Iraq”.
The common Iraqi people have grown frustrated over the years about Iran’s interference in Iraqi politics as well as about Iran’s attempt to unfairly impose Khamenei’s ideology on Iraqi people’s regular way of life.
Even Iraqi Shias, who were previously deemed to be more sympathetic towards Iranian regime, have now grown unsatisfied over Iran’s attempt to impose Khamenei’s ideology on the Iraqi Shia. Not all Shias in Iraq are Twelver-Shias, the version that Iran’s Khamenei preaches. What’s worse for Iran is that even the Twelver-Shias are now rejecting Khamenei regime’s interference on their overall way of life.
Therefore, it is very much evident that Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has lost his acceptability in the minds of the common Iraqis — both Shias and Sunnis alike. Surely, rejecting Khanemei means rejecting the entire Iranian regime.
LEBANESE PROTESTERS REJECT IRANIAN PROXY
The Lebanese people’s frustration about stagnant economy, rampant corruption and unemployment has recently brought them down to the streets to protest. Besides these factors, people’s frustration over the Iranian interference on Lebanese society through Hezbollah, the Iran’s proxy in Lebanon, also played a vital role in triggering the countrywide protests.
According to the Report Syndication, the Lebanese protesters viewed Hezbollah’s chief as Iranian puppet in Lebanese politics. Hence, besides financial security and government’s accountability, these protests reflected Lebanese people’s common aspirations of dignity and guarding Lebanon’s sovereignty against Iranian interference.
Indeed, when Hezbollah’s chief Hassan Nasrallah tried to frame the protests as foreign conspiracy, many Lebanese citizens made and circulated their own videos declaring “I am sponsoring this revolution.”
IRANIANS WANT KHAMENEI TO GO
Iranian people too have grown frustrated on their country’s leadership. The Iranians are now frequently carrying out protests in the streets against the Khamenei regime.
Like the Iraqis, the Iranians too chanted anti-Khamenei slogans. During their protest in November 2019, the Iranians chanted “Down with Khamenei“. This was very courageous, as they chanted this bold slogan knowing that such a slogan against Khamenei inside Iran is considered an anti-state action.
It is also worth noting that in some of the latest protests, another more sensitive slogan were heard from the Iranian protesters. They took the “Down with Khamenei” slogan to the next level when they chanted “Death to Khamenei, Death to Rouhani“.
Iran is experiencing the biggest protests since the Shia Revolution 40 years ago. Furthermore, the number of common people participating in these protests grows every time a protest breaks out.
In many occasions, the Iranian security forces have opened fire on the unarmed protesters. There were even incidents where the security forces fired live bullets on the protesters who were mostly young boys between the ages of 19 and 26.
AYATOLLAH KHAMENEI LOSING SUPPORT IN IRAN
In Iran, Khamenei is now left with few thousand civilian supporters, who are mostly elderly people and have financially benefited from his regime. On the other hand, Iran’s entire young population have either become mentally and ideologically distant from Khomenei or outright turned anti-Khamenei.
Beside the few thousand supporters among the civilians, Khamenei does enjoy full support from military, para-military and other security forces which have considerable number of manpower in uniform.
Many believe that the supporters that are generally seen these days in the pro-regime and pro-Khamenei processions are actually these man-in-uniform. They are instructed to join the processions without uniform so that they look like general Iranian people. This is a clever disguise to fool the world into thinking that a substantial portion of the Iranian people supports the Khamenei regime. However, the reality is that the regime has gradually lost its charm among the civilians, particularly the young Iranians.
THEREFORE…
The growing protests in Iraq, Lebanon and Iran, the Lebanese protesters’ rejection of Hezbollah and sectarianism, the young Iranian protesters’ anti-Khamenei slogans, and the burning down of the Iranian consulates in Iraqi cities — all these factors suggest that the Khamenei regime has now become detached from the young Iranians as well as from its (civilian) support bases in Lebanon and Iraq.
This article was originally publish on Oped Column Syndication (https://opedcolumnsyndication.news.blog/2020/01/03/iranian-regime-lost-its-charm-in-middle-east)
The overthrow of the Shah’s regime in 1978-79 by Islamic fundamentalists seemingly had so much to do with Soviet financial and moral support of Khomeini and his people. The Soviets knew that the Shah (very much anti Communist) was in ill health (he died in 1980) and ever since Mossadegh was done away with in 1953, they were champing to get influential there once again. You add in the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 and you get a much sharper picture of their ambitions in that region.
Yeah that’s what I was thinking. The title is based on a false premise. Why would the American left care about the Iranian peoples opinion. They still lionize Che Guevara, a guy hated and killed by villagers.
Lets be fair. The Left is a collection of tyrant wannabees. They support dictators and attack every freedom we have here in the US.
They also were big supporters of the USSR and how they controlled all their ‘satellite’ countries and ‘allies’ putting down freedom efforts - most famously in Hungary and Czechoslovakia.
They only support democratic actions that get them into power. Then they’re all about domination and fascism.
Actual title...
“Iranian Regime Lost its Charm in Middle East”
Welcome to FreeRepublic.
Rules dictate that you use the actual article title.
The Iranian people want freedom from the mullahs. Democrats love government control and hate freedom. It’s only natural that they would side with the dictators.
It's - "Iranian Regime Lost its Charm in Middle East."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.