Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Pondering Shrinking the NSC, Starting With Firing the Pudgy Fat-Ass "Lieutenant Colonel" Vindman
Ace of Spades HQ ^ | 2/7/2020 | Ace

Posted on 02/07/2020 9:27:39 AM PST by RightGeek

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: RightGeek
A high-profile journalist had important scoops about the general subject of the Russia hoax consigned to the website only, and were blocked from any mention on the air, due to the Fox News Division brass deciding that the thought that any suggestions that the FBI or Mueller were biased and corrupt were also a "conspiracy theory." I know a lot of things. I know that FoxNews' culture is actually quite liberal, and even where it's borderline Republican, it's Paul Ryan bullshit.

I smell a Paul Ryan rat.

21 posted on 02/07/2020 10:09:43 AM PST by bkopto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb
the NSC has become little more than a rest area for intel bureaucrats between billets in the Pentagon, CIA, State Dept., etc.

It's where agencies sent their very best people - their top men - when they can't figure out what else to do with them.

22 posted on 02/07/2020 10:10:43 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek

Vindman’s job was nothing more than a learning experience. Folks get rotated in and out. He is/was due to go out and that’s likely what’s happening.


23 posted on 02/07/2020 10:17:18 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Great it seems to be nothing but a nest of spies and thieves anyway...


24 posted on 02/07/2020 10:18:46 AM PST by TnTnTn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek
The White House is reportedly weighing options to dismiss Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman from the National Security Council (NSC) in an effort to shrink its foreign policy bureaucracy, a report said.

LTC Vindman should not only be dismissed from the NSC but also from the US Army. He serves at the pleasure of the President. He attacked the President, his Commander In Chief, disgraced his service, and betrayed his country.

No need to sugarcoat it. Dismiss him for cause. It is not retaliation. It is responsibility.

25 posted on 02/07/2020 10:18:58 AM PST by DakotaGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek
Anti-retaliation statutes, while necessary, should be limited to prohibiting firings and not reassignments. At least, not at the level where you are working in the White House. If a President is prevented from discharging a staffer whom he no longer trusts, the result is going to be that he's simply going to ignore/bypass that staffer. So they'll still be in that job, but the Presiden won't be receiving the input he/she is supposed to receive.

Shouldn't be any prohibition against transferring Vindeman back to the AF for reassignment.

26 posted on 02/07/2020 10:19:32 AM PST by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DakotaGator

It will be viewed as retaliation to matter how you slice it.

Give him boring no where assignments until he gets the message and retires.


27 posted on 02/07/2020 10:20:41 AM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Reily
Give him boring no where assignments until he gets the message and retires.

Boring and demeaning.

28 posted on 02/07/2020 10:21:29 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Good question. Why is he still taking up space in such a highly sensitive position in the executive branch? That traitor rat and fat disgusting excuse of an Army Officer should be on PLO duty at Camp Swampy while awaiting Courts Martial.


29 posted on 02/07/2020 10:24:38 AM PST by TADSLOS (You know why you can enjoy a day at the Zoo? Because walls work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek

Firing and Replacing the Interagency Working Group ( The Star Chamber) would be a good place to start.


30 posted on 02/07/2020 10:24:42 AM PST by tcrlaf (They told me it could never happen in America. And then it did....ew)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JMS

Head penguin herder in the Antarctic.


31 posted on 02/07/2020 10:30:00 AM PST by Salamander (Living On The Ledge....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek

i am ignorant about Vindman, sorry, so no comment on him here..........
but in the larger situation....
PDJT really still needs to Drain the Swamp a whole lot, and its largely in the security, defense, Snake Department arenas where the Nazis, Commies, IslamoNazis, and other anti-American agents, moles, spies, syncophats, and traitors have (naturally) gravitated to, dug into.

Drain the Swamp, Drain the Swamp!


32 posted on 02/07/2020 10:45:23 AM PST by faithhopecharity ( “Politicians are not born; they are excreted.” Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
Makes one wonder just how bad the damage caused by 8 years of the Kenyanesian Usurpation is on the US military.

The mind reels...

I and other vets on FR talked about this as it was happening. At least in the officer corps, there was starting to be a "loyalty litmus" test applied to every promotion, best described as "Get Woke or Get Broke".

33 posted on 02/07/2020 10:53:15 AM PST by Old Sarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

Testifying that he openly opposed the President to a foreign leader should have been a show stopper, not to mention leaking information.


34 posted on 02/07/2020 10:54:30 AM PST by AppyPappy (How many fingers am I holding up, Winston?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek

“an effort to shrink its foreign policy bureaucracy,”

—Reduce the staff to those who haven’t vowed to “take out the President”. See if anyone is left.


35 posted on 02/07/2020 10:57:09 AM PST by rightwingcrazy (;-,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek
As a retired Lieutenant Colonel myself (not pudgy, btw), I’d be fine if Trump took that smug fatass and had him publicly hanged along with the rest of this coup.

If this had happened to a President Hillary, this guy would already be in Ft Marcy Park.

36 posted on 02/07/2020 11:14:02 AM PST by SIDENET (ISAIAH 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JMS
Vindman should be made a weather observation officer in the Aleutian Islands.

Worse, put him at Midway Island. You can't set a drink down without it resting on bird shit. You don't dare look up with your mouth open. Ever.

37 posted on 02/07/2020 11:15:12 AM PST by DCBryan1 (Quit calling them liberals, progs, socialists, or democrats. Call them what they are: COMMUNISTS!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Fury

Passing the APFT does not have much to do with being over the Army weight standards. I knew a lot of guys who always passed their APFT, didn’t look as fat as this guy and were placed on the Army over weight program. Being on the overweight program disqualifies one from most favorable actions and choice assignments. My son generally scores over 300 on his APFT, is very muscular and gets taped every time he does a PT test because his weight is over the allowed limit for his height. He does pass the tape test. A 6 foot tall guy over 40 is only allowed to be 203 lbs under current Army standards. Vindman looks pretty obviously over weight to me and he doesn’t look like his neck is big enough to pass the tape.
https://usarmybasic.com/army-physical-fitness/army-height-weight-standards


38 posted on 02/07/2020 11:26:54 AM PST by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jospehm20
Passing the APFT does not have much to do with being over the Army weight standards

Good point and I have should have been clearer.

39 posted on 02/07/2020 11:59:12 AM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

The really talented rarely make lateral moves to the NSC.
...........
The campers get into the NSC, often with political agendas and grudges. They have no sense of ownership or loyalty.
..........
They are opportunists that eventually want to be lobbyists or consultants or researchers.


40 posted on 02/07/2020 12:25:58 PM PST by gandalftb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson