To: Black_Rifle_Gunsmith
How does one take anyone named “Josh” seriously?????
2 posted on
12/17/2019 9:23:18 AM PST by
RatRipper
To: Black_Rifle_Gunsmith
Not “ghost guns”. Liberty guns.
3 posted on
12/17/2019 9:34:28 AM PST by
Brooklyn Attitude
(Slavery, the Confederacy, the KKK, and Segregation were all supported by the DemocRAT party.)
To: Black_Rifle_Gunsmith
How about this?
https://www.80percentarms.com/products/0-billet-ar-15-lower-receiver/
4 posted on
12/17/2019 9:40:55 AM PST by
dmcnash
(Back off! I'm a Scientist.)
To: Black_Rifle_Gunsmith
I wonder if Josh had relatives in Europe during the 1940s who wished they could get their hands on some firearms.
Why are people so blinded
5 posted on
12/17/2019 9:42:27 AM PST by
Vaquero
( Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: Black_Rifle_Gunsmith
Old aphorism:
A competent gunsmith can turn a VW Bug into a machinegun in about 8 hours.
6 posted on
12/17/2019 9:52:11 AM PST by
ctdonath2
(Specialization is for insects.)
To: Black_Rifle_Gunsmith
Under his definition, a chunk of steel or aluminum could be considered a firearm.
8 posted on
12/17/2019 10:14:46 AM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
(Everyone who favors socialism plans on the government taking other people's money, not theirs.)
To: Black_Rifle_Gunsmith
There is a huge problem here that isn't being addressed.
It has been strongly suggested that the ATF had decided what constitutes an 80% lower, and what constitutes an 81% firearm, because of an arbitrary decision to designate an AR lower as the serialized part.
There was a case this past summer that let a California man go free rather than challenge the ATF's definition of a firearm with regards to the AR pattern of receiver.
9 posted on
12/17/2019 10:15:38 AM PST by
Yo-Yo
( is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: Black_Rifle_Gunsmith
This isn’t “shaky” it’s absolute insanity.
To: Black_Rifle_Gunsmith
Nothing dumber than a Democrat.
Except a journalist.
Or a “Studies” prof.
But, then again, both two and three are obviously a one.
11 posted on
12/17/2019 10:27:55 AM PST by
Da Coyote
(is)
To: Black_Rifle_Gunsmith
I'm not a lawyer but I believe that SCOTUS has ruled on this general subject on at least 3 occasions. The first two are the famous rulings involving DC and the City of Chicago. However,there's a third one that hasn't received as much attention...Caetano v Massachusetts. That,too,was a ruling on just what is,and what isn't,protected by the 2nd Amendment.
In that decision SCOTUS overruled the Massachusetts state Supreme Court (the "Supreme Judicial Court") by a vote of 9-0.
It's worth reading.it's easily found through google (I'm too lazy to provide a link).
12 posted on
12/17/2019 10:51:03 AM PST by
Gay State Conservative
(The Rats Can't Get Over The Fact That They Lost A Rigged Election)
To: Black_Rifle_Gunsmith
This is now a firearm?
15 posted on
12/20/2019 1:16:10 PM PST by
Magnum44
(My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson