Posted on 10/17/2019 5:40:07 AM PDT by NOBO2012
Im not exactly sure what this means but it cant be good. Heres the deal:
I saw this photo of Fiona Hill arriving to testify, or whatever, in the Impeachment Inquiry, or whatever, conducted by the House Intelligence Committee, or whatever committee is investigating the President this week - I didnt care enough to check but I presume at some point this circus has to move onto the Judiciary committee and my only thought was:
Oh look, Fionas wearing black stockings! Maybe the bare-legged look is finally over.
Can I hear it for a return to grace?
So there you have it, my fever broke for a day or two. By repeating the soothing mantra I dont give a Schiff I managed to suspend my rage by remembering a more civilized time when bare legs were considered vulgar unless you were wearing shorts.
For several days I was fine, ignoring everything leaked by the Kangaroo Kourt. Until yesterday that is, when the President met with members of Congress to discuss the Syrian situation and little Miss Fancy-Pantsy advised President Trump that with him all roads lead to Putin. She-of-little brain conveniently ignoring the fact that it was President Obama, not President Trump, who allowed Russia to get a foothold in the Middle East. And that it was Obamas redline head-fake that created todays mess.
The party whose political ideology brought slovenliness to virtually every level of human behavior only now thinks to ask why the hell are we standing down? Unfortunately it was their squad that let their panties get in a bundle.
And Im pretty sure they dont know how to unbundle them so theyll just blame President Trump. And continue to bitch about the incivility. Well if they insist on continuing this fight they might want to stock up on some of these:
Uni-panties They take a lickin and keep on kickin
Posted from: MOTUS A.D.
“”Eleven years after retirement I still have 10 boxes of Leggs in my drawer. Why?””
Same here but mine are the “Silkies” as I just posted. I’ve been retired for 13 years and have no idea why I need so many...They do last a long time.
LOL! Just looking at those things ... I can’t breathe. I wonder how I got any work done at the office squished into those things for 9 hours a day.
Well, all I can say is I didn’t have the long legs this model had....still don’t!!
I don’t know who came up with the idea of pantyhose but he/she must have made a fortune and no doubt still making it!
I don’t think we were ever aware of them after we got them on. It was putting on and taking off that required a little skill - LOL. I have a bad back now and I doubt I could even get into them. I have trouble bending over to put on socks (which I wear when cold weather comes) or cut my own toenails..
I hear ya! About three years ago I started to go to a salon for pedicures — which I hate, but are necessary now. Too many aches and pains now.
I haven’t given in to it for myself YET as I can still manage my own after a fashion but I do have to take my husband to get his toenails cut - they are much too tough and deformed for me to do besides I can’t bend over to do his. I’ve tried doing them sitting in a chair while he’s in the recliner but I still can’t manage it. It’s very difficult getting him in and out of the car to take him anywhere except for medical appointments but the nails need to be cut and that’s the only way. I have a caregiver one morning a week to help so I can get to the store etc., but they are not allowed to cut toenails. He does enjoy the spoiling he gets from the Vietnamese ladies at the salon so it is a highlight of at least one day for him.
Well, I would have an argument with ‘for comfort all the time’; and I’ve never seen a ‘no-run’ pair.
But this thread inspired me to actually buy a pair of L’eggs today, to see if they’ve improved in either category.
And don’t get me started on strapless bras, which the lady in your ad seems to be wearing. Those things have required new engineering for decades. The long-line ones are the only ones that ever have worked for me.
(My husband saw me writing on this thread, and he said “the problem with women’s clothes today is that they leave nothing to the imagination - and imagination is the most fun part of looking at girls”...)
(My husband saw me writing on this thread, and he said the problem with womens clothes today is that they leave nothing to the imagination - and imagination is the most fun part of looking at girls...)
Agreed with your husband. What also bothers me that good bit these days is this peculiar double standard seemingly very common. Ones like Lena Dunham can openly talk about or even expose their privates but Princess Kate was the target of snide comments and remarks from these same sorts of people for wearing pantyhose as much as she did when she first came to North America.
And you can imagine if Leggs or Hanes or Burlington were to bring back the women’s hosiery ads that were commonplace on TV back when I was growing up (1970s and ‘80s), you’d hear the same people up in arms about how sexist those ads are, etc. The ads that featured ones like Juliet Prowse (RIP), Barbara Eden, Joyce DeWitt, and others just simply featured attractive and confident women and nothing sexist or exploitative. Hoping I am not being odd or silly or strange with discussing these sorts of things.
1981 ad with Debby Boone:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHBGzxuypIs
I don't need to understand it. I just need to appreciate it.
I agree with you entirely. (And ‘these sorts of things’ are part of what life is made of, and give evidence of where we stand and where we are going.
I’m a woman, and I’m sick to death of radical feminism and its juvenile, artificial, manufactured ‘angst’ over silly stuff like this. A lot of so-called ‘women’ these days need to grow the hell up :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.