Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China Unveils ‘Doomsday Bomb’ While U.S. Military Concentrates on “Diversity”
The Sun ^ | 2 October, 2019 | Paul Joseph Watson

Posted on 10/02/2019 6:45:56 PM PDT by amorphous

While China unveiled a new ‘doomsday’ nuclear bomb that can “strike the US within 30 minutes with ten warheads,” a top US General declared gender and race “diversity” to be a “warfighting necessity” against the homogeneous forces of China and Russia.

We’re truly screwed.

Billed as the “ultimate doomsday weapon,” the fearsome super nuke was displayed during China’s 70th anniversary parade in Tiananmen Square.

“The Dongfeng-41 is a 7,672 mph intercontinental ballistic missile that is said to have the furthest range of any nuclear missile and could reach the US in 30 minutes,” reports the Sun.

(Excerpt) Read more at summit.news ...


TOPICS: Government; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: china; diversity; missile; nuclear
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
To: amorphous

Truthfully, I doubt these missiles will perform up to snuff, for the reason of “overkill”. A misunderstood term, it means “missile failure”, for a multitude of reasons.

The US has long had the very best ICBM missiles in the world, yet these very high quality missiles could never overcome overkill. I think they maxed out at 70%, an almost unrealistic number for success. In an actual fight, their overkill might drop to 30-40%, which is why, in past, both the US and USSR had such enormous arsenals of nukes.

Well, this Chinese missile might look impressive on the ground, and travel at very high speeds, but that just makes overkill worse. It’s called the law of diminishing returns, and with missiles, it’s pretty brutal.


41 posted on 10/02/2019 8:22:01 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Liberalism is the belief everyone else should be in treatment for your disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xrmusn

That’s a personal relief for me if she’s Army. My basic premise stands.


42 posted on 10/02/2019 8:24:49 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

So Khrushchev was right after all.


43 posted on 10/02/2019 8:38:14 PM PDT by Rembrandt (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Just as long as there is no fighting in the war room we should be ok.


44 posted on 10/02/2019 8:45:31 PM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

Its not an advantage.

It’s pc bullshiite.


45 posted on 10/02/2019 8:49:24 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cen-Tejas

Our Navy, maybe...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Victoria_(1887)


46 posted on 10/02/2019 8:51:21 PM PDT by Paul R. (The Lib / Socialist goal: Total control of nothing left worth controlling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: LongWayHome

Good Lord .. those missiles might do one tenth as much damage as “diversity”!


47 posted on 10/02/2019 9:15:04 PM PDT by The Duke (President Trump = America's Last, Best Chance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

When I looked at the various failures (and successes too) of US missile defense systems tests, I was struck by how many of the failures were NOT actually directly due to pushing the edge of the technology. Instead, many of the failures were “stupid stuff” / lack of attention to ordinary mechanical details, and such. (Paraphrasal) “Retaining arm did not retract”, and so on.

Having dealt with Chinese vendors in the past on many occasions regarding MUCH simpler items*, my experience is that it is VERY difficult to get the Chinese to consistently pay attention to detail, or not sneak in some substandard aspect to the quality. It’s not impossible to get “good stuff”: we had one magnet supplier who was literally better quality than any of the US sources, but, they were very much the exception. Even the European companies operating in China could be maddening to deal with when it came to QC.

*Basically, those were components to go into assemblies (definitely no “rocket science” type goods) made in the USA. We were sometimes forced to go to China because US vendors had conceded the field.)

Anyway, I don’t disagree with your point, but, it does seem as if when one pushes the edge, more failures show up throughout the endeavor.


48 posted on 10/02/2019 9:20:48 PM PDT by Paul R. (The Lib / Socialist goal: Total control of nothing left worth controlling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

America will lose the next major war because of these “diversity” lesbians like Lori and her ilk.


49 posted on 10/02/2019 9:24:17 PM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (Ban liberals, NOT guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt
We're being destroyed from within alright, but not by Khrushchev or the former Soviet Union per se. But by a new brand of socialist/communist ideology in conjunction with a green movement nurtured by globalists.

And for other reasons as well; like lukewarm apostate Christianity, which allowed for the rise of abortion and other immoralities, which spread worldwide.

Ever increasing debt, failing education, over extended force projection, a failing political class, and other issues also contributed to our somewhat decline.

So I'm hesitant to give Khrushchev all the glory for something we've done to ourselves, in a large part - that is if MAGA fails.

We're not done yet though. And we've hardly begun to really fight back. Where we have, we're seeing success; in fighting abortion, illegal immigration, and at least for awhile, with the economy.

Of all the problems we have facing us, I believe stopping abortion is the most important thing we can do to gain back approval of the Almighty, the one protector, we as a nation and individually, can't thrive without.

50 posted on 10/02/2019 9:25:15 PM PDT by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: amorphous
How do we explain this WINNING!!! this SWAMP DRAINING!!!! MAGA!!! GET IN HERE, PEDES! THIS IS HUGE!!!
51 posted on 10/02/2019 9:37:25 PM PDT by Captainpaintball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen

Sorry, I just checked and she is ID’d as USMC

WHEN did the Corps give up the Blood Stripe?

I notice the two USMC types in the background or maybe(?) no Blood Stripe on Whites?

That blouse doesn’t look like any USMC uniform I had ever seen.


52 posted on 10/02/2019 9:46:44 PM PDT by xrmusn (6/98"HRC is the Grandmother that lures Hansel & Gretel to the pot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Stated airspeed (the unclassified airspeed that is) of current ICBMS is roughly 17,647 mph, with a max range of 8,000 miles with an accuracy of 800 feet radius of target point! 800 feet in 8K miles. Course the warhead doesn’t have to be precise like an artillery shell

Their 7K mph is actually slow. 30 mins to the US? What part?

As example: 5740 mile from central Montana to Beijing at 17647 mph is arrival time at 19 minutes— assuming stationary land based launch. Much faster from other delivery means... subs, aircraft etc, who could be closer in


53 posted on 10/02/2019 9:49:03 PM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wildcard_redneck

Yep, see my post on ETA for just one of US land based from Montana to beijing. Not even comparable. Doomsday— they make it sound like Dr. Strangelove.

Woo- woo factor of the pillow biters. they fire one of these and they will be largely.... glass. Not like the movies.


54 posted on 10/02/2019 9:51:59 PM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

““The Dongfeng-41 is a 7,672 mph intercontinental ballistic missile that is said to have the furthest range of any nuclear missile and could reach the US in 30 minutes,”

It’s a regular, normal ICBM.

They’re all that fast.

And China has about 30 of them. And somewhere between 300 and 400 warheads.

Meanwhile, we have a Trident boat within 500 miles of Beijing that can put 200 warheads up their ass in less than 15 minutes...and each of them will detonate, assuredly, within 100 ft of their assigned target. Flight time 5-7 mins.

And there’s likely a second Trident boat in the North Pacific ready to follow up.

Did I mention there are 550 Minuteman IIIs ready to go in minutes?

Hell, the US has more tactical nukes than China has in their entire arsenal. Yes, those B-52s on Guam and in Hawaii have full loads, ready to go.

They sweep in last, just to see if anything is left.


55 posted on 10/02/2019 10:00:19 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian

“we had 200 Chinese missiles which could reach the west coast of the US.”

The Chinese have about 50 ICBMs. Total.


56 posted on 10/02/2019 10:03:12 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: The Duke

She’s a real leader/s


57 posted on 10/02/2019 10:03:56 PM PDT by LongWayHome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

AH!!!!!!!!!!!


58 posted on 10/02/2019 10:45:38 PM PDT by dp0622 (Bad, bad company Till the day I die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous
Obama, was One Big Ass Mistake America.

America by definition is diverse, Dummycrats.

59 posted on 10/02/2019 10:49:46 PM PDT by Chgogal (Trump: Make America Great Again. Democrat: Make America Mexico Again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian

He also had all the circuit board targeting cards pulled from the missiles


60 posted on 10/03/2019 1:19:08 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson