Posted on 09/26/2019 9:18:14 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
After Gayle King of CBS's "This Morning" read the transcript of the phone call between President Trump and the Ukraine president, she wondered aloud if this was "a big bowl of nothing" and concluded along with Paula Reid that there was NO quid pro quo. In their own grudging ways the other networks also concluded that no quid pro quo could be found.
PING!
And will they admit that the ‘whistle blower’ is reporting rumor and hearsay only?
It isn’t “nothing”
It is a billboard in front of America demonstrating that the Obama administration was corrupt.
This Will Totally Destroy Trump! (Volume MCXXXVII)
townhall.com ^ | 9/23/2019 | Kurt Schlichter
Posted on 9/23/2019, 9:59:43 AM by rktman
“Well, ________________ is going to totally be the thing that lets us crucify Trump! Yeah, Russia flopped and his alleged Nazi-ness failed and that weasel ex-lawyer/convict of his struck out, but we promise – this time, ___________ is going to bring him down!”
So saith CNN, the Times, the gang at LonelyNeckbeardedLeftistLoser.com and the rest of the cabinboy media, along with the carb-curious Fredocon dorks and the surviving furries, pseudo-Cherokees and other assorted Democrat weirdos currently wandering about in Iowa pestering farmers to join them for selfies. There’s always a new _____________, except the “bring him down” part just never seems to happen.
No coffee for the liberal establishment, because coffee is for closers (NSFW language, sissies). These geebos have been trying to close the deal since 2015, but all they have to do it with are the Rio Rancho leads – they never get the Glengarry leads that will put a stake through the heart of the Bad Orange Man.
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
The fake news headlines that were popping up on my phone this morning made it sound like Trump had definitely encouraged Ukraine to interfere in the election.
I blocked Bloomberg as a result. And Wall Street Journal is on thin ice.
Gayle King occasionally tells it like it is.
However, Norah O’Donnell(now the CBS evening host) NEVER does.
Andrea Mitchell still likes to claim that Bill Clinton was exonerated when it came to Juanita Broaddrick.
She last claimed that during the 2016 election.
Quid Pro Joe, in contrast, has a problem.
I must be getting dyslexic in my old age. I read the phrase as a “Big BLOW of Nothing” and thought, “Gee, is Monica B. Lewinski back in town?”
Hi, could I get a 20-piece McNuthin (c) meal please?
I don't think the Bolshekrats want to turn over the Government to Pence, though, they think he will be easier to beat.
It is not hearsay in snything like the traditional legal meaning. It is the result of reports by partisans operating on the surface as WH and Intel staff BUT who in reality were reporting to former high level Obama, Hillary and Brennan staffers. The problem for them is they cannot produce written accounts as that would expose an undertaking to perform a coup. There are written reports but these serve only as a way of recreating them as being supposedly overheard independent event which OMG can be tied together into an impeachment narrative. Very very slick, but can it overcome 4th, 5th, and 6th amendment protections.?
Right-which more than anything has cut the ‘moral ground’ out from under the US.
Thanks “O”, you half-wit!
Dems crying wolf again!
I saw a tweet this morning that cracked me up: “Has anyone asked Taylor Swift about impeachment? I need guidance.”
“I don’t think the Bolshekrats want to turn over the Government to Pence, though, they think he will be easier to beat. “
impeachment and even conviction (which will ever happen) does not prevent Trump from running in 2020 ...
Yeah but this is all the commie media has, this is their one chance to get rid of President Trump who they dont even consider President..they are nothing more than shills for the Democrat party, they are one and they dont care what they have to do to get power, by stealing it, doesnt matter, they want power
Oh, man that is funny. You should 'trademark' that phrase. I know you can't do that, but it is good...so good, that delicious is too mild.
Lemme guess, the quid pro quo talk was a “dog whistle” so we couldn’t hear it. I guess that makes the leaker a “dog whistle blower”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.