Posted on 08/29/2019 5:44:33 AM PDT by Morgana
Police Taze Man With Hands Up After Catching Him Stealing A Bike! Are They Wrong?
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Seems that tazing was a bit much what with hisb hands up and not moving.
Meaningless.
Did you invent the stat, or is their a source?
Alas, we have all seen the videos with multiple cops on scene yelling different, conflicting things.
"Don't Move!" yells one. "Get on the ground!" yells the other. The only difference here is your decision - freeze or drop to the ground - determines while cop shoots you.
That said, Im sure youll crap on the floor and do a Mexican hat dance around it to underscore your imagined victory. This isnt the source I had in mind, probably on my home computer in this instance, youll have to use your reading skills to buzz through the FBI.gov stats on officers killed in the line of duty as well to get your per capita number.
https://www.dolanconsultinggroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Dispelling-the-Myths-Surrounding-Police-Use-of-Lethal-Force.pdf
The primary source will do me some good. I will read it. I have an MS in Data Science and have a solid foundation in this type of stuff. Without it, your summary is useless. This may surprise you, but people misrepresent stats all the time.
Thats why I check the source. Id still like to have it.
Take this chart for example:
This is a classic example of mixing data and incompatible scaling. Notice that the data all comes from the CDC, except for the shootings (the data that the author is trying to convince us about). This data is then taken to make an "apples and oranges" comparison (i.e. data on shootings from one source compared with data on assaults from another source).
Many of the charts in this paper have the same twist.
The author also has foot notes to bolster his point:
Interesting. He asserts that the risk of death from a doctor or nurse is 254 times greater that from police use of force and provides a reference to a WAPO article:
You can look at the link for yourself: Researchers: Medical errors now third leading cause of death in United States
But guess what? There is no support for the author's claim in this article. The number 254 never appears.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.