Seana McKenna (left) as Julius Caesar and Michelle Giroux as Mark AntonyPosted on 07/20/2019 7:12:10 AM PDT by NOBO2012
Last year I went to the annual Shakespeare Festival in Stratford, Ontario. You may remember me discussing it at the time.
They had a production of The Tempest showcasing Martha Henry as Prospero – the revenge seeking wizard exiled to a remote island. The role of Prospero is considered a plum role and highly sought after by men in their fifties or sixties as it is quite possible they would have a 15-year-old daughter. Given that the director chose to fundamentally transform Prospero’s character from Miranda’s father to her mother it’s a bit more of a stretch for the 80 year old actress. But hey, that’s the magic of theater.
Also part of last year’s Shakespearean offerings was Julius Caesar…where the lead was played by Seana McKenna, Cassius by Irene Poole, and Michelle Giroux as Mark Antony – women all. Nor were they the only gender bending roles, several other male characters in Julius Caesar were played by women because:
“It makes a lot of sense that in this day and age, a play with so few female characters should have women playing some of the more juicy male roles.” - BWW
It makes a lot of sense to a certain segment of the population. To the rest of us it just appears stupid and manipulative.
Seana McKenna (left) as Julius Caesar and Michelle Giroux as Mark Antony
Yet CBC Radio seemed surprised that all that gender-bending created a bit of blowback.
This year at Stratford, two of Canada's theatre greats will be playing "trouser roles." Seana McKenna will play Julius Caesar and Martha Henry will play Prospero.
Even in the 21st century, it has unsettled some patrons.
Speaking to The Sunday Edition's Michael Enright, Martha Henry says that Stratford has had complaints about the cross-gender casting.
"They've had people who were really incensed about this. Some even said they weren't going to come."
Martha's response?
"Tell them that if they don't come, they can't complain, because they will have nothing on which to stand. Come first, and see what you think."
Um, okay, I’ll not complain about not spending $100+ per ticket to not see the performance. We chose instead to see the Music Man which was a wonderful production. Even then one had to suspend one’s disbelief somewhat to imagine that in 1912 River City, Iowa a black Henry Hill could pull off the con of selling non-existent band instruments and wooing Marion the fair librarian.
But then, The Music Man is a bit tongue-in-cheek in the believability department to begin with so casting is less critical than it is in oh, say, a historical Shakespearean play where they pretend to be gender blind. Daren A. Herbert, the actor who portrayed Hill explained why he hates the term “colourblind” casting:
“I hate the lie it portrays because it insinuates that you’re seeing something that is not unseeable. People come to see this show and they see me — a black guy. There’s no way to pretend that I’m not.” – Windsor Star
In other words, there is no such thing as “colourblind” casting: nothing is more obvious than the color of one’s skin. It is what it is. And that’s fine. Herbert is a great actor, a great singer and dancer and the musical was a delight. But you know and I know and Daren A. Herbert knows he was chosen for the part because he was black, not despite it. The arts have an agenda. At least The Music Man’s director wasn’t trying to convince us that men and women are interchangeable parts.
Plus they did their homework to ensure that the pluralistic culture of the mythic River City wasn’t a complete pipedream:
Herbert and director Donna Feore did some homework on that period — “and it’s not as though there were no black people there. There was one who was fairly high up in the Republican Party, so we’re not completely out of the bounds of reality.”
Ha ha! A Republican! Now isn’t that a kick in our racist teeth. Anyway, we all know the premise is still a stretch - it’s not a racist thing, it’s a historical thing - but we chose to play along and had a good time.
All of which is a long way around to the lede, allow me to introduce the next Agent 007: Lashana Lynch will play 007 in new James Bond movie.
“It’s a popcorn-dropping moment. Bond is still Bond but he’s been replaced as 007 by this stunning woman,” the source told the Mail.
Either that’s a bad publicity photo of Lashana or I no longer understand the meaning of “stunning.” For insurance purposes however Danial Craig still plays a retired James Bond although his special number has been reassigned. Good luck social engineers of the arts and letters crowd, sooner or later you hit the wall. I think you may have arrived.
Posted from: MOTUS A.D.
Turning Lead into Gold doesn’t work either
My 15-year-old girl loves Shakespeare and has since age 10 and she hates when they alter roles, make women men, or make relations homosexual.
“Turning Lead into Gold doesn’t work either”
Now you tell me.
Yeah, the goal is to convince the general population through the arts that a boy is just a girl without boobs. < /s >
Blacks have such an inferiority complex, everything that was white has to pretend to be black now.
This is how they gain control over casting. They raise a fuss, and the producers capitulate. Next time it’s easier, until the left has complete control over who’s cast for a part.
After casting, what will they go after next?
You just confused the democrat voter.
007 portrayed by an ugly transvestite or whatever that thing in the picture is. 007 had a good run, sorry it is over. They should have just closed down the franchise if they are out of ideas.
Well, when you consider that in Shakespeare’s day, all the characters were played by MEN, including the female parts, I see nothing wrong with it.
Let it succeed or fail on it’s own merits.
You left out Cleopatra and Xerxes.
Cleopatra has been portrayed as Black for so long that my Sister who is intelligent, thought she really was Black.
Either that’s a bad publicity photo of Lashana or I no longer understand the meaning of “stunning.” For insurance purposes however Danial Craig still plays a retired James Bond although his special number has been reassigned. Good luck social engineers of the arts and letters crowd, sooner or later you hit the wall. I think you may have arrive
_________________
There are much better picutres of her, but I think that the producers are not only pushing back against “maleness” but also pushing back against “ tradtional female beauty’.
Gotta be Woke ya know!
I predict a short run!!!!
I have no problem with this. I mean talent is talent. That’s why I am willing to play, Malcom X, Jackie Robinson, Martin Luther King and Richard Pryor in my one man show,,” Making it Right by Playing it White!”
Someone is claiming Xerxes was black?
That’s a new one to me!
Did you see 300?
I bet Ian Fleming is spinning in his grave. Up next, Mata Hari re imagined as a queer...........hey, considering that the upper echelons of both the Brits and Germans were loaded with faggots that one might work and garner almost as mediocre and audience as a Black, female Bond.
FWIW, “Turnabout Intruder” was the final nail in the STOS coffin.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
