Posted on 03/27/2019 3:32:14 PM PDT by jfd1776
When I was a youngster – shall we say, college through my teens – I occasionally exceeded posted speed limits. Not all the time, of course, and not so wildly to be a danger to the road, but often enough that I got to know Chicago’s “supervision” program rather well.
In Cook County, there is a time-honored tradition that minor traffic offenses – almost always speeding tickets – can be disposed of by going to court and saying “I’d like to stipulate guilt, your honor, and request court supervision in recognition of my otherwise excellent driving record.”
If the judge grants it (in theory at least, it’s not guaranteed), you pay court costs (in my day, it was about a hundred bucks, the cost of the ticket), and it doesn’t go against your record, as long as you don’t have another ticket for four months.
Yes, I will admit, the lead foot of my youth caused me to take advantage of this program, sometimes, a couple times per year. (I went straight when I got married; I haven’t had a speeding ticket since the early 1990s).
Now, there are a number of reasons for this program, but I always assumed that the key ones are these: while we want every violation of the law to be punished in some way, there’s no need to waste time and resources on something as minor as driving five or ten miles over on the expressway, when the court has more important crimes, like drunk driving, blowing red lights, and other things that are more likely to cause fatalities. Losing a day of work to go to court plus paying $100 court costs is probably punishment enough, without wasting the court’s resources on a trial and putting points against the driver’s record as other violations would more obviously merit.
Whether we agree with this process or not, it’s the way things are in Cook County, and I suspect that while the rest of the country reacted in horror to the announcement that Jussie Smollett’s sixteen felony counts were dropped Tuesday, with only forfeiture of his $10,000 bail as his penalty, the concept of traffic court “supervision” was probably one of the first things to come to mind for us Chicagoans.
THE JUSSIE SMOLLETT CASE
Actor Jussie Smollett filed a police report in which he claimed to have been attacked by two thugs outside a Chicago sandwich place in the middle of the night… in fact, on one of the coldest nights in years. Much of America immediately disbelieved the story of a complex hate crime at subzero temperatures at 2:00am, and the story quickly turned from a search for the perpetrators into an investigation of whether he had in fact filed a false crime report.
Eventually, Smollett himself was indicted for 16 felonies, posted $10,000 bail, and became a national punchline, as he claimed that somewhere in Chicago there were anti-black, anti-gay bigots so deluded as to shout “This is MAGA country” in one of the most solidly Democrat cities in the country. Whatever Chicago may be – and it is many things – it’s not MAGA country.
America waited with bated breath to see what would happen.
Chicago’s police had expended considerable effort on an international search (one claim was that the attackers were Nigerian)… the city feared bad public relations as it continually tries to grow its film business (we’ll never rival Hollywood, but every show helps)… and the public was offended, as we pride ourselves in being rather tolerant in these matters. It’s been a hundred years since the Chicago race riots; we’ve elected blacks and gays and women and every other imaginable minority to public office here in the years since. We have our problems – lots of them – but “minority intolerance” isn’t one of them.
Everyone expected Mr. Smollett, if convicted, to be hit with something severe. Surely prison time would be appropriate; the question would be how much.
When Mr. Smollett was essentially given “supervision” by the Cook County prosecutor, even the mayor and police chief went into shock. To them, and to the public too, this said that the prosecutor viewed all these issues as being unworthy of trial, unworthy of substantial punishment.
It could mean that the prosecutor had personal political reasons for it, all her own (rumors of connections abound, and this is Chicago, after all, where everything is political). But could those reasons outrank the reasons that the mayor and the police chief have for wanting a proper prosecution attempted?
If it is true that this was a false report, then the city and its people have taken a huge hit, being branded as inhospitable territory. In addition to the hundreds of thousands of hard dollars spent on the case, it could have cost Chicago tourism, film or series bookings, convention business… each of which could have meant millions of dollars in lost revenue. If it was a false report, such a hoax merits a much more serious punishment than a $10,000 “court costs” forfeiture… and if it was a real report, then there are two dangerous lunatics out there pouring bleach on people at 2:00am, who really need to be found and committed to an asylum.
The decision to prosecute or not to prosecute each crime can indeed be a complex one, and we in the public will never know for sure how strong or weak a case the state had, when it decided not to continue to trial. There are still many unknowns in this case.
But what is known for certain is that future practitioners of “hate crime hoaxes” have gained a great deal by this decision. Despite our knowledge of the damage that “hate crime hoaxes” do to the public – from the Tawana Brawley accusations to the Duke lacrosse team, and so many more over the years – our society is still reluctant to prosecute the false accusers, no matter how much damage these false accusers may do.
THE MUELLER COMMISSION
We now know that early in the days of the Donald Trump campaign for the presidency – possibly as early as his announcement in 2015 – there were deep state operatives colluding to find a way to sabotage his effort.
Both positive and negative campaigning are of course perfectly legal, but the Hatch Act and other statutes restrict almost everyone in the federal government from most forms of active participation in either kind.
When the Mueller Commission finally released its internal report to the Attorney General in March, 2017, it became a matter of public record what had long been suspected: that top-echelon employees of the FBI had been involved in an effort to defame US citizens and candidates, to provide priceless political contributions to his opposition in the form of an unjustified investigation, and to undermine or otherwise hamstring a sitting president for the full first two years of his term.
Now that the faulty FISA warrants and fabricated data on which the commission was based have all been revealed as unquestionably fraudulent, the government has closed the book on the commission, and technically, that’s that. No further indictments. Case closed.
But is that fair?
The “Russia collusion” narrative was a hoax, nothing more, nothing less. It never had a drop of truth to it. Whether one likes President Trump or his administration or not, there are no two ways around this fact: A hoax was perpetrated on him, on his supporters, and on his administration.
All over the world, reporters and politicians have been repeating the lie for two years that the American president is a Russian agent. As outlandish as such a claim always was, millions and millions of people have believed it.
This affects how foreign governments see America. It affects how American voters have been voting, and will continue to vote.
And – like all hoaxes – even when they are proven to have been frauds all along, some percentage of those who heard the hoax will never hear or absorb the fact that it was disproven. A quarter or a third or more of the American electorate – having heard trusted voices in the press and the government repeat the claim, day in and day out – will always cast their ballots in the future having this lie in their heads, misguiding their judgment in the election booth.
Should such a crime – the entire Mueller Commission, its advocates and its publicists – be simply swept under the rug and be forgotten?
Or is it time to make a stand at last, and proclaim loudly to the world that Truth Matters, and the knowing perpetrators of destructive hoaxes must be held to account, once and for all?
Copyright 2019 John F. Di Leo
John F Di Leo is a Chicagoland-based actor, writer, Customs broker and trade compliance consultant. His columns are regularly found in Illinois Review.
The second hoax (Smollett) was meant to take attention away from the “unintended consequences (for the left)” of the first hoax (Russia).
It’s done what they wanted, in some measure, knocking the emphasis on the Mueller story off the headlines.
It’s called “saving face” for the media, so they have something other than Trump’s win (and their guilt) to talk about.
If nothing is done about the fraud, the lies, the failed coup d’état, the media coverup, and the rest; if nothing is done regarding the worst scandal (CollusionGate) that America has ever faced - then we are doomed to repeat it. And next time - the bastids might win and therefore destroy America.
Now is the time for Trump, Barr and his DOJ, and the Repubs in Congress to go all out on Obama, Clinton, Brennan, Comey, Clapper, the media elite and hundreds more.
Start filling Gitmo with these traitors.
Not so much. Fox is covering Smollett a lot.
CNN and MSNBC, from what I've seen, are sticking with the Russia story, and not having much to say about Smollett.
They don't want anything to distract from the anti-Trump campaign, and neither does their audience.
Jussie Smollett's hoax was so half-@ssed it's hard to seriously believe that it was part of some larger conspiracy.
The coup attempt isn’t over yet. House Democrats will take another run at it.
Of course they will. They’ve been doing it for 50 years.
Sheesh....it’s like they all got the same memo. Reads like a Rush montage.
I was 17 years old in 1970. In my SoCal neighborhood, cars were the thing during that decade, though custom choppers were popular for a time during the eighties.
Most of the guys who built and rode those bikes were also low riders, and the custom work on their choppers reflected that.
They couldn’t stand losing the Russian Hoax, so they allowed Smollett to get away with his Hoax Against Trump Supporters. They wanted to feel good about something afterall. They just keep outting themselves as Deep State Scum. They think they can keep getting away with this crap.
John Cardillo Verified Account
@johncardillo
I can confirm via DOJ and FBI sources that DOJ and FBI is taking a peek into why #JussieSmollett was given the sweetheart deal.
https://mobile.twitter.com/johncardillo/status/1111035351362166786
never let a crisis go to waste
they disposed of the controversey over their 2 year witchhunt and perjury as well as the mess of having to come down on a socialist justice warrior from a protected class who had Democrat pol connections.
Rahm Emanuel blames Trump for Jussie Smollett controversy, creating ‘toxic environment’, tells him to ‘sit on the sidelines’
Trump tweets FBI, DOJ will review Jussie Smollett case
CHICAGO – Mayor Rahm Emanuel on Thursday emphatically urged President Trump to butt out of the ongoing drama over embattled “Empire” actor Jussie Smollett as he blamed him for creating a “toxic environment” where someone would allegedly fabricate such an attack.
“My recommendation is the president go to Opening Day baseball, sit on the sidelines and stay out of this,” Emanuel told a group of reporters.
The mayor called Chicago a “Trump-free zone” and blamed the president for creating a “toxic” and “hate-filled” environment that allowed Smollett to think he could get away with faking a hate crime.
TRUMP SAYS DOJ, FBI TO REVIEW OUTRAGEOUS DECISION TO DROP CHARGES IN JUSSIE SMOLLETT CASE
“Let me be clear about something. The only reason Jussie Smollett thought he could take advantage of a hoax about a hate crime is because of the environment, the toxic environment that Donald Trump created,” Emanuel said.
“This is a president who drew a moral equivalency between people who are trying to perpetuate bigotry and those who are trying to fight bigotry.
More Rahm trash talk at link below.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/chicago-mayor-urges-trump-to-sit-on-the-sidelines-in-the-smollett-case
I was thinking the punishment for this lie should be the same as it would be for the perpetrators of such an act, had it actually happened. But his career is over. That’s some added punishment. Oh and it took the focus off other Hollywood creeps.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.