Posted on 01/28/2019 4:42:33 AM PST by Travis McGee
During the attempted electronic lynching of the Covington Catholic high school boys on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, the mask hiding the Left’s genocidal rage slipped and was momentarily visible. The reality of the confrontation was inverted 180 degrees by the duplicitous mainstream media so that a smiling white teenager was made to face the wrath of an Orwellian two-minute hate that stretched on for days, even after the factual record was corrected. Accelerated by social media, the virtual lynch mob called for, among other horrors, MAGA-hat-wearing teenage boys to be fed headfirst into wood chippers, or for them to be locked en-masse into their school and the school to be burned to the ground.
This hurricane of socially sanctioned racial fury did not arise spontaneously, but was the result of deliberate cultivation over the past few decades by the political Left, academia, the mainstream media, and the Hollywood entertainment elite. Entire books could be written laying out the many already familiar examples of the Left encouraging racial animosity against whites, but that is not my goal in writing this piece.
I am instead observing that before every notorious genocide, the same pattern of marginalizing and demonizing a designated scapegoat population has occurred. On the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, the national mainstream media signaled that it was now acceptable to vent seething racial hatred against white males, even teenage boys. This was further telegraphed when notable verified Twitter blue-check accounts were not suspended after doxing the boys and posting explicit calls for violence against them. (By way of contrast, I was permanently banned from Twitter for posting an anti-burka meme that did not even name a religion.)
The Covington confrontation points to an ironclad historical pattern. Every previous genocide in modern times was preceded by a similar pattern of public demonization of state-designated scapegoats. But is correlation causation? Does the American Left intend to eventually commit genocide against white heritage American males? In my opinion, yes. Scapegoating is part of a clear pattern of conduct seen during every socialist power grab from the French Revolution until now. In the case of German national socialists, European Jews were the scapegoats of the Nazis during their climb to power. In the case of international socialists, AKA Communists, class enemies were usually but not always the designated scapegoats. Examples of class enemies would include the Kulaks in the Soviet Union, “landlords” in China, and “intellectuals” in Cambodia. But in other cases ethnic groups were targeted as scapegoats by Communists, to include the Ukrainians, Crimeans, Latvians and others.
So, are today’s Democrats already planning to load their white heritage American enemies into boxcars for trips to a new Gulag? Probably not many at this time, but Barack Obama’s political mentor Bill Ayers certainly considered it. Ayers believed that so many Americans would bitterly resist Communism that 25 million would have to be “eliminated.”
Today in the United States, a possible future genocide remains far down the track and around the curve, well out of sight, and beyond the power of most Americans to even imagine. But the historical record is clear. Broad social approval of class- or racially-based scapegoating is a necessary precursor stage to eventual genocide, and a combination of both variants was clearly seen in the Covington case.
Will planned genocide ever be the overtly stated policy of the socialist-leaning Democrat (DemSoc) party? Probably not. Even Adolf Hitler never put “The Final Solution to the Jewish Question” into a formal written order, but the Holocaust happened nonetheless. Vladimir Lenin was less cautious, recording his orders for state terror and mass murder in his own handwriting.
But today’s American Democrats are still far from that final stage of dealing with their enemies. For now, the demonization of their future scapegoats is only one indicator of the current phase of the Gramscian “long march through the institutions” stealth communization process that is now underway.
So what is the overall process currently in play, and where are we on the timeline? I am going to assume that readers of this essay are already familiar with the Dunning-Kruger Effect and the Cloward-Piven Strategy. Summarized, the current Democrat strategy for political victory is to maximize the number of government-dependent morons, in order to overwhelm our national ability to pay for all of the government’s mandated social programs, to thereby collapse the system and bring about a revolutionary political climate. This is taken straight out of the Bolshevik and Alinsky handbooks. Vladimir Lenin supposedly put it this way: “The worse, the better.”
As the government fails to keep up with its social welfare promises, the Democrats will blame their pre-designated scapegoats for every one of their own failures. In the United States, Public Enemy Number One will be older white Christian conservative heterosexual men who will be called obstructionists and saboteurs. Being morons, the Dunning-Kruger Democrats will fall for the party line, and also blame white heritage American scapegoats for the failure of their own party’s utopian promises.
Why will the Democrats push for social welfare programs that are impossible to achieve, that in fact have failed in every other case ever attempted? Because they only care about attaining permanent power for themselves, and this process is a proven method for reaching that goal. The Democrat elites are content to rule the ruins of a failed nation, in perpetuity. And to do so, they will need a convenient scapegoat population to blame for their own failed policies, and that is why they are encouraging identity (racial) politics, as starkly seen in the Covington confrontation. They are preparing their time-tested psychological weapons of mass destruction for the next phases in the ongoing stealth communization process. You may observe the history of Venezuela over the past twenty years to see the entire process carried out from start to finish.
The unexpected election of President Donald Trump indicated to Democrat party leaders that there were still too many white heritage Americans as a percentage of the electorate for them to cement their identity-politics socialist triumph in perpetuity. There are not yet enough moronic Dunning-Kruger Democrats to push the DemSocs over the top in national elections forever.
THE CALIZUELA MODEL
Despite Trump’s 2016 victory, a glowing example of the solution to their national electoral shortfall is clearly visible to Democrat leaders. In my lifetime California was the wealthiest and most successful state in the union. It produced Republican governors and even sent Ronald Reagan to the White House. But due to open borders and unchecked immigration, California is halfway to becoming Venezuela, or as I shall term it, Calizuela. The former Golden State has gone from national leader to national embarrassment, with squalid tent cities for its burgeoning homeless population, complete with needle- and feces-strewn sidewalks.
Amazingly, this observable failure is counted as a great political victory by the Democrat party. Calizuela is proof that flooding a state with government-dependent foreign idiots and rewarding them with driver’s licenses and voter cards can turn a formerly conservative Republican state into a one-party Democrat stronghold in a single generation. The proven Calizuela formula is blazingly clear to the Democrat Party bosses in the other 49 states: import as many poor and illiterate foreign immigrants as possible, because over 80 percent of them will sooner or later become reliable Democrat voters. (And this is the reason that Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats refuse to pay more than one dollar for an actual, physical border wall or barrier.)
(Read the rest at the American Partisan link here.)
What do powerplants in Nebraska run on? Where does it come from? Will that distro system still be operational, front to back?
The can convert to coal from Wyoming. Or is Wyoming going to be a dystopian waste land too? Again Matt you are simply painting with too broad of a brush.
I guess that is a form of control, but not what I think of as control.
My idea of Control is the ability to turn it on or off at will.
If you destroy an insulator you are not going to be able to turn the power back on. The trouble with shooting out a transformer or insulator at a substation is that the average guy with a rifle will not know what that substation support. He may be taking out a very large area that may impact friendlies as well as foes. It could also cause a cascade that may take out all of his friends.
There is a lot to consider before you decide to start shooting a substation.
By the way a .22 or a squirrel will do the same thing as a 30.06.
Enough people will be so angry that they will only care that they still see light across the highway or RR right of way in “hostile territory,” and that will be enough to spur them to turn them off. Turning them back on will not be a consideration.
Hey, I sure hope that some heartland or NW Bastion continues on, I really do.
Such emotional people must be brought under the control of more rational leadership quickly or will need to be weeded out.
A hot head in your midst is as deadly as a sniper on a roof.
Vital infrastructure must be preserved.
Large transformers are not even manufactured in the US anymore. The lead time on a large transformer is about a year. And there are only two or three places in the US that rebuild them.
If some idiot shoots one after the SHTF that area would be out of power indefinitely.
In my brigade such an act would be a death sentence because that man would be responsible for many deaths.
If the USA is in the thrall of anarchy/civil war, the rest of the world is going to slide into a depression. No country will be loading up ships with enough food to keep the blue hives from imploding.
Ditto fuel deliveries. China and Russia will have their own problems.
On the other hand, the U.S. has a lot of assets to offer for food. There are significant assets of American corporations abroad, if the people or countries trading for them were willing to take the risk on the Blue side coming out the winner.
But, I suspect you are essentially correct. The U.S. is a major food exporter. Stop that, and the entire world is hurting. Famine in Africa, much of Asia, Mexico, the Middle East, Possibly Europe.
LA, NYC and DC will be supplied from the sea. Even Chicago could get supplies through Canada and down lake Michigan.
Thanks and also for your ongoing efforts to preserve Liberty.
We must do what we can with what we have while we can.
And no doubt it will also be a hanging offense from the state / national government on down.
But what power will they have while stores and fuel-dry 18-wheelers are looted to the ground?
What power will your militia have? Compared to millions in the thrall of panic/anger/fear?
“Will be supplied from the sea.”
By whom? The same folks who are sending ships of food to Venezuela (not)?
I'd settle for Billy Ayers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.