Posted on 09/30/2018 8:59:12 AM PDT by kevcol
They pouted about how the FBI had so far not reached out to Michael Avenatti’s client, the third accuser, Julie Swetnick who ridiculously accused a 17-year-old Kavanaugh of running a “gang-rape” racket in high school. Following’s ABC’s long-held editorial standard of only giving viewers half the information, they omitted how she was sued by a former employer for sexual harassment.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
It is too restrictive, it should include sexual assault allegations brought against ABC news executives, on air talent and staffers.
Every Democrat is a violent totalitarian thug.
The question is...DO WE TRUST THE FBI? Who is doing the investigation? Rosenstein? Wray? Or sleepy Jeff?? If any of those anti-trump are ...kavanuagh is screwed! No one inside the FBI can be trusted...NO ONE ..O’keefe videos proved that!
The msm and the dims wouldn’t be happy unless a special prosecutor was appointed to persecute BK.
I assume the FBI will be doing a thorough background check on Ms. Ford. They need to look at her high school record, to see if she is a credible witness. All of her 54 conquests. Interview all of the boys she had in high school, to see if her account of assault holds up.
Wonder if she understood the anal exam she was in for. FBI will find the scrubbed High School yearbooks, Facebook and other social media sites. All of her mental and medical records. Won’t be pretty.
And of course it will all be leaked.
Don’t worry ABC. You have enough hateful, liberal, liars and weakling Republicans to destroy Kavanagh. His innocence only makes you prouder of your hand in his destruction.
Nothing but wishful thinking.
Nothing substantive will be done to the accusers, the RATS or the MSM. Once Kavanaugh is confirmed the accusers will fade into oblivion (unless they write a book) while the RATS and the MSM move on to their next contrived outrage over whatever supposed transgression they think or wish the President has committed.
Every Democrat is a violent totalitarian thug.
.
.
.
Yes, and we’ll get nonstop demands for hearings if they take over midterns.
What is not restricted are the investigations of violations of federal law - lying to Congress, obstruction - that Grassley has asked for and are properly within the purview of the FBI, or would be if we had an attorney general.
Keep and open mind, you may change your mind by the end of next week.
But no complaints about her social media history being TOTALLY restricted
I assume that FBI won’t be doing much if any further background check on the accuser. Any conversation w her will be in the presence of her lawyers who will object to virtually everything asked of or requested from her...right down to a copy of her own yearbook...or proof that she did in fact go to a couples counseling session in 2012.
I have not heard/read her entire testimony. I don’t know if the GOP’s dud of a lead questioner asked her if she has ever accused anyone of sexual crimes, harassment, etc in the past, did she ever attend any political events in the past 3 years, if she had frequent flyer accounts and with whom, etc. The questioner should have asked her right up front if she had a problem with having a male Senator asking her any questions.
If she said “yes”, that would have put the democraps on the committee in a nice box. If she said “no”, then the GOP committee members could do the job to fill in the missing pieces as well as zero in on Feinstein. Anyway... it is all water under the bridge and the FBI won’t get to ask her the questions that really should be asked because her lawyers know objection and delay can be used in the process to thwart the quest for “the truth” that they have no interest in helping bring to light.
This is the expected opposite of the hillary investigation. She was declared innocent before the investigation. The left wants Kavanaugh declared guilty before the investigation. I’m sure there are enough agents in the FBI who would be happy to oblige. Not counting the elusive rank and file Patriots.
Why should ABC be worried. As a news organization there only worry should be accurate reporting of the facts. When they start pressing for a particular outcome, they are no longer a news organization.
Of course, but that is precisely the point. Journalism now attracts people who want to be personally important and ‘change the world’. It's a career that selects for leftist activists. Activism and using the ‘news’ to alter public opinion and the course of history is what allows them to think of themselves as ‘great’ and ‘important’ and ‘history making’.
This is what makes them leftists. Being conservative, and recognizing the importance of individuality in society, the importance of self-empowerment and self-determinism, the importance of allowing people to form their own opinions, and the importance of avoiding suppression of individuality by a centralized government, would allow them the potential to be ‘special’ and ‘saviors’ of the world, and to thus massage their immature egos and narcissistic needs.
It ALL comes down to ego. All of it. Think Hillary, think Katie Couric, think Dan Rather, and it is all very clear. Small people, with a huge need to be BIGGER than everyone else.
would allow = would NOT allow
Funny how now that the democrats have gotten their way are now criticizing the length of time and other factors in case it does not come back the way they said it would. What is more spectacular is the way certain media outlets are saying the same things, outlets like ABC.
Week ending 10/6?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.