I would have to say nothing because I’m clueless rrgarding these ridiculous terms. And I’m too old to want to know, and to care about learning. (I just found out what CISgender is.)
In a country that elected Trump how can this nonsense be occurring, and taking a foothold?
Can the university legally restrict freedom of speech?
This sounds like a lawsuit waiting to happen.
A woman can remove her tits and a man can lop off his pecker but the DNA still says what they are
I refer to people as he/she him/her they/them... I will never use one of the otherwise made-up pronouns for gender-whatever. I will refer to someone by the gender as *I* see them. I will not be told how to think.
Until states allow nonsense sexes on id cards, the best thing to do is call the cops. The imaginary offense of misgendering is an accisation of “violence”. Call the LE and tell them youve been accused. Cops take IDs and IDs show sex.
This at least establishes sex for upcoming suit. False id might only be a misdemeanor in a given state but misidentification on a federal level is a felony and a lot of these students have federal loans.
There has to be an attorney out there willing to run with that and hopefully get it to the new SC.
Dont laugh, dumber questions have made it that far.
Colleges are not teaching. They are carrying out their true mission in life: to transform this country into hell, where normal White Christian males are forced to work at menial jobs, and 60% of their earnings are taken to be given to government-certified victim groups who will continue to abuse and scorn the normal White Christian males.
This could be fun.
“My name is Ima Nidiot. My gender identity is black lesbian trapped in a white man’s body. My gender pronoun is Your Highness.”
This is being added to our ERP. Right now, my preferred pronoun is HRH(His Royal Highness).
Okay, either gender is a completely artificial construct, or it is not. Make up your minds, leftists!
Enter Fascism......
Is “Hey, Weirdo” a preferred pronoun? Just askin’...
“I’ve come to understand after all these years of experience that calling a transgender woman a man is an act of violence,”
So "preferred" is now the politically correct term for mandatory?
Regarding University of Minnesota (UMN) policy, constitutionally low-information UMN officials unsurprisingly have two constitutional problems on their hands imo.
First, by promoting LGBT people as a privileged / protected class, UMN officials are unthinkingly effectively violating the Constitution's Clause 1 of Section 10 of Article I imo, which the Founding States made to prohibit state actors from establishing protected classes.
"Article I, Section 10, Clause 1: No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility [emphasis added]."
Next, UMN officials are also in violation imo of the Constitution's Section 1 of the 14th Amendment which expressly prohibits state actors from abridging rights that the states have amended the Constitution to expressly protect, 1st Amendment-protected free speech in this case.
14th Amendment:
"Section 1: All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States [emphasis added]; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
"Section 5: The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article."
H O W E V E R …
What anti-Constitution activist UMN officials have in their favor regarding their violations of constitutionally enumerated protections is this. The corrupt, post-17th Amendment ratification Congress left over from the lawless Obama Administration has a track record for wrongly remaining silent instead of doing its duty to make punitive laws that discourage activist state actors from abridging constitutionally enumerated protections.
The remedy for Constitution-ignoring federal and state governments …
Patriots need to finish the job that they started when they elected Trump president.
More specifically, patriots now need to be making sure that there are plenty of Trump-supporting candidates on the 2018 primary ballots, candidates who will be willing to make laws to punish state actors who couldn't care less about our enumerated protections.
Patriots then need to pink-slip career lawmakers by sending patriot candidate lawmakers to DC on election day so they can start supporting Trump in weeding the constitutionally enumerated rights abusers out of the system.
And until the states wise up and repeal the ill-conceived 17th Amendment, as evidenced by concerns about the integrity of the outcome of Alabama's and Pennsylvania's special elections, patriot candidates need to win elections by a large enough margin to compensate for the following concerns.
Keep Pelosi from becoming Speaker again.
Obama: Pelosi will be speaker again after November midterms
Keep Democrats from impeaching Trump.
Democratic Rep. Al Green says he will force House impeachment vote
Young, misguided, newly registered pro-gun control voters who are likely clueless about the fed's constitutionally limited powers.
Possible deep state ballot box fraud and associated MSM scare tactics.
Interference from people like Soros.
“When someone does not go along with a person whose biological sex does not match their preferred gender — such as refusing to call a biological man a woman”
This statement is the definition of delusion and insanity. I’m to accept under penalty of law what someone thinks of themselves over what my lying eyes sees.
So I’m supposed to call skinny a fat broad simply because she prefers to be skinny!?
Eventually they could do with Christians as the Nazis did with Jews and take all of their jobs and income.
"What is your question Pat?".
When people would see a bit where someone says they are Napoleon they laughed because they were crazy.
Now the democrats are saying they are Napoleon or a variation of this. Get the white coats and locked them up!
Cat O’ Nine Tails for the Heathens!