Since when do Palestinians (Muslims) care about gay rights?
I can answer these, easily. These are not the “gotchas” he thinks they are.
Ask Dean if Sharia Law has ANY place in US courts...
Sounds like a religious test.
My understanding is that any religious test in this matter is unconstitutional. That man’s question can’t be asked.
I’ve never really understood the “right of a woman to control her own body” when the right of the unborn human to live is totally disregarded.
Their only concern is: do they bounce when they toss gays off of buildings to kill them?
Taqiiya
They are insane on the left. Any nominee that made the Bible the law of the land would not be able to uphold the Constitution, as is required. DUH!
But they would be 100% with an insane jihadi who made the koooran the law of the land.
Kinda funny watching them all froth and foam about what scares them.
None of these 4 picks is a threat to you! YOU are a threat to US!
Stackem deep Mr President
Stalin was a conservative to the nuts at CNN
The Bible?? That is absurd. The Bible?? Do you worship the Bible?
I doubt any of the candidates would have difficulties with these questions.
The left loves their religious tests.
“. . . no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.”
Shades of Clarence Thomas and “Natural Law”.
The Big Lie of this soon-to-be-circus of a Supreme Court nomination process is that if Roe v. Wade is repealed women will no longer be permitted to get abortions.
The truth is that if Roe v. Wade is repealed, each state will be able to determine whether to allow abortions or not, most of which will allow them.
If Donald Trump’s nominee were to explain this during his or her confirmation hearings, or if one of the Republican Constitutional scholars on the Senate Judiciary Committee such as Ted Cruz were to do so, the Democratic-incited hysteria would end.
If women were made to understand that Armeggedon was not upon them, it would be easier to get a Conservative justice approved.
If two women in particular — Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski — were to understand this, they would be more likely to approve a Conservative nominee.
So why do I fear that, as usual, NO ONE will bring this up at the hearings?
I think the likeliest nominee to do so would be Amy Barrett because she had the courage to stand up for her religion during her Appeals Court hearings.
But if any of the other finalists is nominated it promises to be “mumble, mumble, law of the land” when Roe v. Wade is brought up, and, even with a firm 5-4 Conservative majority on the Court, the prospects for genuine change will be minimal.
Any such question should be greeted with an immediate asking “Is this the religious test portion of this hearing?”
Since it makes it a lot easier to decide who to throw off roofs.
-PJ