Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/09/2018 5:13:11 AM PDT by EyesOfTX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: EyesOfTX

“Fainting Felon” is clever, but she’ll always be PIAPS to me.


2 posted on 07/09/2018 5:15:40 AM PDT by T-Bone Texan (Get off my lawn and GTFO of my country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX

Politically correct but substantively a woman Supreme Court Justice is a disaster.


3 posted on 07/09/2018 5:20:58 AM PDT by Jim W N (MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX

Three words: Sandra Day O’Connor


6 posted on 07/09/2018 5:31:42 AM PDT by Arm_Bears (Hey, Rocky--Watch me pull a rabbit out of my hat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX

I so disagree. Give her time in her relatively new position to see how her conservative, pro-Constitution views hold up. As someone else on FR pointed out last week, when Ginsburg goes (one way or another) the outcry will be for a female to replace her. It’s best to save the best female for that point, who might or might not be Barrett.


7 posted on 07/09/2018 5:32:26 AM PDT by grania (President Trump, stop believing the Masters of War!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX

She may be qualified but please tell me of one past or existing female SCOTUS justice that was not a liberal. The three existing female SCOTUS justices would, I believe, influence her enough that she would “grow in office.”


8 posted on 07/09/2018 5:33:20 AM PDT by fritzthecat (I only regret my economies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX

Insufficient experience...


9 posted on 07/09/2018 5:35:18 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX

Clinton is “leaking” her impending Presidential run (again). I hope the Democrats fall for it (again), and have her suck all of the oxygen out of their campaigns.


12 posted on 07/09/2018 5:54:04 AM PDT by richardtavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX

I ageee she would be the best choice but I am not sure she’s confirmable. And if she fails then there will be no time before the election for plan B.


16 posted on 07/09/2018 6:04:44 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX

We MUST have a strong constitutionalist on the SC.

Does she qualify?

Literally nothing else matters.


17 posted on 07/09/2018 6:05:07 AM PDT by agere_contra (Please pray for Pope Benedict XVI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX
"they will have people coming out of the woodwork to accuse them of sexual harassment or some other sorts of wrongdoing from many years ago that cannot be proven or disproven. For this simple reason alone, the President should pick Judge Barrett to fill this seat. As we saw during the 2016 election campaign, it is just too easy for the Democrats to go out and pay a woman or ten women to claim they had affairs or were sexually harassed by a male nominee."

Well, that's it then. Only women will be appointed to the Supreme Court from now on. The children of newer arrivals around the east and west coasts have spoken. Besides, Democrats know about the "woman's prerogative" and tendency. And they're banking on it.


19 posted on 07/09/2018 6:07:21 AM PDT by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." - -Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX

McConnell is supposedly pushing Trump to name Hardiman as he thinks it will be easier to get him confirmed.


26 posted on 07/09/2018 6:37:04 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX

“Corey Booker? This guy’s closet looks like a skeleton repository”
But Hillary’s is squeaky clean?
How is it that no one is pure enough to pass muster, but this hag keeps getting the nod?
She’s half of the most notorious crime syndicate in D.C.


27 posted on 07/09/2018 6:41:31 AM PDT by Fireone (Build the gallows first, then the wall!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX

She has been my first choice, based mainly on her connection with Scalia. I watched this video (it’s from shortly before the 2016 election) of her last night. I came away from it less impressed than I expected to be, but I’ll admit I couldn’t get much of a read on her. There are some things I don’t like about the other contenders, so I guess she’s still my first choice, but I’m wavering and not as confident about her as I was.

https://youtu.be/7yjTEdZ81lI


33 posted on 07/09/2018 6:55:27 AM PDT by FreedomForce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX

The fact that all these RINO, liberals, and foreigners want this chick says she’s the worst candidate.


43 posted on 07/09/2018 7:29:52 AM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX

You and I both agree on this, Eyes. Barrett is the smartest choice and gives the Democrats less Leverage in there resistance.


48 posted on 07/09/2018 8:02:47 AM PDT by Brocko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX

What happens (with ANY female candidate) at change-of-life time? Do many of them really go off the rails, or is that just a misogynist legend?


49 posted on 07/09/2018 8:13:37 AM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX

This would be a tough appointment.

It would be better for her to be the appointment to the outgoing RBG or the wide (intentional) Latina, after Republicans have passed the 2018 midterms and increased their Senate majority.


56 posted on 07/09/2018 8:57:59 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson